![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Apprentice Crank
Mar 2006
2×227 Posts |
![]()
This thread contains the old sieve reservations and the old discussions in the sieve reservation thread.
-------------------------------------------- Original post: 2700G-2850G complete (first range) http://www.sendspace.com/file/j2pe66 Gribozavr, could you delete all of the candidates with factors (10G-3500G) from the sieve file? After you've done that, please remove all the candidates with k>500000 and upload that file to sendspace*. We'll test all the small k values first before LLRing 500000<k<10M, and LLR manual reservations will be open once the file is up. Primegrid wants a deeper sieve depth, so we'll give them the bigger k's to test once the optimal sieve depth is close to being reached. *Put all the candidates with k>500000 into a separate file, but don't upload that file yet. Last fiddled with by Oddball on 2010-05-13 at 07:40 Reason: 10G-3500G range update |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Mar 2005
Internet; Ukraine, Kiev
11×37 Posts |
![]()
I have downloaded and verified all submitted factor files.
MooooMoo: Here's a file with small k's: http://www.sendspace.com/file/vmi4kt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Feb 2007
211 Posts |
![]()
4700-5500G Complete cipher [Range 1]
http://www.sendspace.com/file/xt70dp MooMooo: "Combine my Ranges if you get a chance" For example: So you can save space. 3000G-3200G cipher complete 3200G-3500G cipher complete 3500G-3700G cipher complete TO 3000G-3700G cipher complete Thanks. Last fiddled with by cipher on 2009-08-27 at 23:54 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Feb 2007
110100112 Posts |
![]()
5500-6000G complete [Range1] cipher
http://www.sendspace.com/file/u8cr5l Gribozavr: What is the % of factors which are duplicate? Or wut % of actual factors come out from a file. 6000G-6500G Reserved cipher [Range1] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Feb 2007
211 Posts |
![]()
6500G-7000G Range 1 Reserved cipher
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Feb 2007
211 Posts |
![]()
6000G-6500G complete [Range 1] Cipher
http://www.sendspace.com/file/phnfcz 7000G-10000G cipher [Range 1] Reserved |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sep 2004
13·41 Posts |
![]()
10000G-12000G reserved how high are we going?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Feb 2007
110100112 Posts |
![]()
I am guessing 50T @ least Josh.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sep 2004
10000101012 Posts |
![]()
ok, I'm 25% done here on my C2Q Q6600. Is it more efficient to run two singles or one -t2? Has anyone experimented with all the config settings to find something better? Like block size and prime sizes?
12T-15T reserved. Last fiddled with by Joshua2 on 2009-09-05 at 01:07 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Feb 2007
211 Posts |
![]()
6500G-10000G complete [Range 1] cipher
http://www.sendspace.com/file/pgvgty 15T-17T cipher Reserved [Range1] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Jan 2005
Caught in a sieve
5×79 Posts |
![]()
17T-20T Ken_g6 Reserved [Range1]
I'd better get in on this before Cipher takes it all! Joshua2, from what I've seen, for one N, -t2 is about as fast as two singles. For multiple N's, -t4 looked about as fast as well, but I haven't tested with V0.3.x yet Which reminds me, MooMoo, my latest version is: http://home.att.net/%7Ek.brazier/pro...-0.3.4-bin.zip And I think it's going to stay that way for awhile. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soapbox Discussions | only_human | Soap Box | 41 | 2019-11-16 15:46 |
n=390000 discussions and old reservations | TimSorbet | Twin Prime Search | 31 | 2010-05-22 23:13 |
Sieve reservation discussions | jmblazek | Twin Prime Search | 27 | 2007-01-31 21:41 |
Primegrid discussions | pacionet | Twin Prime Search | 17 | 2007-01-20 11:22 |
Automated PRP discussions | ltd | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 20 | 2006-09-02 22:19 |