Archived sieve reservations and discussions

MooooMoo · 2009-08-19, 06:44

This thread contains the old sieve reservations and the old discussions in the sieve reservation thread.
--------------------------------------------
Original post:
2700G-2850G complete (first range)

http://www.sendspace.com/file/j2pe66

Gribozavr, could you delete all of the candidates with factors (10G-3500G) from the sieve file? After you've done that, please remove all the candidates with k>500000 and upload that file to sendspace*. We'll test all the small k values first before LLRing 500000<k<10M, and LLR manual reservations will be open once the file is up.

Primegrid wants a deeper sieve depth, so we'll give them the bigger k's to test once the optimal sieve depth is close to being reached.

*Put all the candidates with k>500000 into a separate file, but don't upload that file yet.

gribozavr · 2009-08-21, 17:09

I have downloaded and verified all submitted factor files.

MooooMoo: Here's a file with small k's:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/vmi4kt

cipher · 2009-08-27, 23:54

4700-5500G Complete cipher [Range 1]

http://www.sendspace.com/file/xt70dp

MooMooo: "Combine my Ranges if you get a chance" For example: So you can save space.

3000G-3200G cipher complete
3200G-3500G cipher complete
3500G-3700G cipher complete

TO

3000G-3700G cipher complete

Thanks.

cipher · 2009-08-29, 20:37

5500-6000G complete [Range1] cipher

http://www.sendspace.com/file/u8cr5l

Gribozavr: What is the % of factors which are duplicate? Or wut % of actual factors come out from a file.

6000G-6500G Reserved cipher [Range1]

cipher · 2009-08-31, 13:14

6500G-7000G Range 1 Reserved cipher

cipher · 2009-08-31, 18:11

6000G-6500G complete [Range 1] Cipher

http://www.sendspace.com/file/phnfcz

7000G-10000G cipher [Range 1] Reserved

Joshua2 · 2009-09-04, 19:15

10000G-12000G reserved how high are we going?

cipher · 2009-09-04, 23:20

I am guessing 50T @ least Josh.

Joshua2 · 2009-09-05, 00:53

ok, I'm 25% done here on my C2Q Q6600. Is it more efficient to run two singles or one -t2? Has anyone experimented with all the config settings to find something better? Like block size and prime sizes?
12T-15T reserved.

cipher · 2009-09-05, 01:33

6500G-10000G complete [Range 1] cipher

http://www.sendspace.com/file/pgvgty

15T-17T cipher Reserved [Range1]

Ken_g6 · 2009-09-05, 02:42

17T-20T Ken_g6 Reserved [Range1]

I'd better get in on this before Cipher takes it all!
Joshua2, from what I've seen, for one N, -t2 is about as fast as two singles. For multiple N's, -t4 looked about as fast as well, but I haven't tested with V0.3.x yet

Which reminds me, MooMoo, my latest version is:

http://home.att.net/%7Ek.brazier/pro...-0.3.4-bin.zip

And I think it's going to stay that way for awhile.

2009-08-19, 06:44	#1
MooooMoo Apprentice Crank Mar 2006 706₈ Posts	Archived sieve reservations and discussions This thread contains the old sieve reservations and the old discussions in the sieve reservation thread. -------------------------------------------- Original post: 2700G-2850G complete (first range) http://www.sendspace.com/file/j2pe66 Gribozavr, could you delete all of the candidates with factors (10G-3500G) from the sieve file? After you've done that, please remove all the candidates with k>500000 and upload that file to sendspace. We'll test all the small k values first before LLRing 500000<k<10M, and LLR manual reservations will be open once the file is up. Primegrid wants a deeper sieve depth, so we'll give them the bigger k's to test once the optimal sieve depth is close to being reached. Put all the candidates with k>500000 into a separate file, but don't upload that file yet. Last fiddled with by Oddball on 2010-05-13 at 07:40 Reason: 10G-3500G range update

2009-08-27, 23:54	#3
cipher Feb 2007 211 Posts	4700-5500G Complete cipher [Range 1] http://www.sendspace.com/file/xt70dp MooMooo: "Combine my Ranges if you get a chance" For example: So you can save space. 3000G-3200G cipher complete 3200G-3500G cipher complete 3500G-3700G cipher complete TO 3000G-3700G cipher complete Thanks. Last fiddled with by cipher on 2009-08-27 at 23:54

2009-09-05, 00:53	#9
Joshua2 Sep 2004 215₁₆ Posts	ok, I'm 25% done here on my C2Q Q6600. Is it more efficient to run two singles or one -t2? Has anyone experimented with all the config settings to find something better? Like block size and prime sizes? 12T-15T reserved. Last fiddled with by Joshua2 on 2009-09-05 at 01:07

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Soapbox Discussions	only_human	Soap Box	41	2019-11-16 15:46
n=390000 discussions and old reservations	Mini-Geek	Twin Prime Search	31	2010-05-22 23:13
Sieve reservation discussions	jmblazek	Twin Prime Search	27	2007-01-31 21:41
Primegrid discussions	pacionet	Twin Prime Search	17	2007-01-20 11:22
Automated PRP discussions	ltd	Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5	20	2006-09-02 22:19

2009-08-21, 17:09	#2
gribozavr Mar 2005 Internet; Ukraine, Kiev 11×37 Posts	I have downloaded and verified all submitted factor files. MooooMoo: Here's a file with small k's: http://www.sendspace.com/file/vmi4kt

2009-08-29, 20:37	#4
cipher Feb 2007 211 Posts	5500-6000G complete [Range1] cipher http://www.sendspace.com/file/u8cr5l Gribozavr: What is the % of factors which are duplicate? Or wut % of actual factors come out from a file. 6000G-6500G Reserved cipher [Range1]

2009-08-31, 13:14	#5
cipher Feb 2007 211₁₀ Posts	6500G-7000G Range 1 Reserved cipher

2009-08-31, 18:11	#6
cipher Feb 2007 211 Posts	6000G-6500G complete [Range 1] Cipher http://www.sendspace.com/file/phnfcz 7000G-10000G cipher [Range 1] Reserved

2009-09-04, 19:15	#7
Joshua2 Sep 2004 13×41 Posts	10000G-12000G reserved how high are we going?

2009-09-04, 23:20	#8
cipher Feb 2007 211 Posts	I am guessing 50T @ least Josh.

2009-09-05, 01:33	#10
cipher Feb 2007 211 Posts	6500G-10000G complete [Range 1] cipher http://www.sendspace.com/file/pgvgty 15T-17T cipher Reserved [Range1]

2009-09-05, 02:42	#11
Ken_g6 Jan 2005 Caught in a sieve 5·79 Posts	17T-20T Ken_g6 Reserved [Range1] I'd better get in on this before Cipher takes it all! Joshua2, from what I've seen, for one N, -t2 is about as fast as two singles. For multiple N's, -t4 looked about as fast as well, but I haven't tested with V0.3.x yet Which reminds me, MooMoo, my latest version is: http://home.att.net/%7Ek.brazier/pro...-0.3.4-bin.zip And I think it's going to stay that way for awhile.