mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-10-06, 03:47   #34
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

3×13×197 Posts
Default

Build 3 available. Fixes pepi's problem with PRP of non-Mersenne numbers.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-06, 09:32   #35
pepi37
 
pepi37's Avatar
 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)

1,487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
Build 3 available. Fixes pepi's problem with PRP of non-Mersenne numbers.

Build3 working perfect
Thanks!
pepi37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-07, 16:49   #36
JCoveiro
 
"Jorge Coveiro"
Nov 2006
Moura, Portugal

29 Posts
Default

Build 3 solved partially my windows11pro performance issues.

But it is still slower when I stop and restart Prime95.

If I do a fresh boot up of my machine it gives around 2,850ms/iter.
But if I stop the task and restart it the performance goes down to 3,250ms/iter.

But at least it's better then the old 5,900ms/iter that I was getting on restart.

It is also known that win11 has some performance problems with Ryzen.
They're fixing it. Hope they can fix it.

I never had performance issues in windows10 with Prime95.
JCoveiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-07, 17:07   #37
JCoveiro
 
"Jorge Coveiro"
Nov 2006
Moura, Portugal

29 Posts
Default

[UPDATE]: Performance bad again on a restart, around 5,750ms/iter
JCoveiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-07, 20:30   #38
tuckerkao
 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123

22×3×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCoveiro View Post
But at least it's better then the old 5,900ms/iter that I was getting on restart.

It is also known that win11 has some performance problems with Ryzen.
They're fixing it. Hope they can fix it.
Does this issue only occur with the Ryzen CPUs, or there are similar delays for the Intel CPUs too.

Has Prime95 30.7 been tested on AMD Threadripper CPUs yet? Does Prime95 30.7 recognize the differences between the E and P cores of Intel 12900k?

It maybe a good idea to wait until the beginning of next year for me to buy a new PC, less troubleshooting and performance issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Delo View Post
Your wish is my command...

Code:
[Worker #1 Jun 10 01:33] Iteration: 410000 / 168308323 [0.24%], ms/iter:  2.386, ETA: 4d 15:15
[Worker #1 Jun 10 01:34] Iteration: 250000 / 168485323 [0.14%], ms/iter:  2.403, ETA: 4d 16:18
[Worker #1 Jun 10 01:34] Iteration: 160000 / 168548323 [0.09%], ms/iter:  2.409, ETA: 4d 16:39
Ben Delo's AWS instance seems still somewhat faster than the top speed of Jcoveiro's PC.

Ben Delo's engine: 2.40 ms/iter
Jcoveiro's engine: 2.85 ms/iter

Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2021-10-07 at 20:38
tuckerkao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-07, 20:56   #39
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

28×3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuckerkao View Post
[...] Ryzen CPUs [...]
There is an additional problem with Ryzen CPUs in Windows 11. The new scheduler has problems with the CPUs such that the L3 cache is used incorrectly (the calculations are correct, but data transfer is slower).

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuckerkao View Post
Has Prime95 30.7 been tested on AMD Threadripper CPUs yet?
Yes, I am running ECM on one. Unfortunately, it is crashing and I am currently trying to reproduce it more reliably. It always generates an entry into the event log like:
Code:
Error code: 0xc0000005
Error offset: 0x00000000020813bf
These numbers stay the same.

Edit: This is Zen 1 on Windows 10. Sorry for letting this out.

Last fiddled with by kruoli on 2021-10-07 at 21:19 Reason: Additions.
kruoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-07, 21:23   #40
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

170038 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
Yes, I am running ECM on one. Unfortunately, it is crashing and I am currently trying to reproduce it more reliably.
I doubt it has anything to do with Zen. Please tell me the worktodo.txt entry as well as the amount of memory ECM is allowed in stage 2. I'll start a run under the debugger and see what happens.

Note to all: Until build 4 comes out, hyperthreaded torture tests must use the custom setting and select FFT sizes larger than 256K.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-07, 21:39   #41
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

28×3 Posts
Default

PM sent, thanks!
kruoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-08, 19:26   #42
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

10111001001002 Posts
Default

Would really like to have the option to specify get DC assigned via PrimeNet yet automatically run them as PRP DC/GEC/proof-gen on the prime95 v30.7bx client. Or to be able to specify getting PRP DC candidates & run them as PRP DC/GEC/proof-generation. Pig-in-a-poke generic DC as the only DC preference choice means LL DC may land on (newish) AVX512 hardware that's recently started throwing multiple Jacobi symbol check errors / DC exponent. I don't think forcing less-reliable hardware to either run first tests, or periodically produce sketchy LL DC, is the way we want to go.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-09, 18:30   #43
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

11110000000112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
Would really like to have the option to specify get DC assigned via PrimeNet yet automatically run them as PRP DC/GEC/proof-gen on the prime95 v30.7bx client. Or to be able to specify getting PRP DC candidates & run them as PRP DC/GEC/proof-generation. Pig-in-a-poke generic DC as the only DC preference choice means LL DC may land on (newish) AVX512 hardware that's recently started throwing multiple Jacobi symbol check errors / DC exponent. I don't think forcing less-reliable hardware to either run first tests, or periodically produce sketchy LL DC, is the way we want to go.
Try work preference of 155. It's been there all along, probably never been tested.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-09, 19:02   #44
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

3·13·197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nordi View Post
I noticed that for ECM on small exponents, stage 2 init now takes a lot longer than before.
Computing better pairing is expensive. For large exponents this is well worth the cost as each multiplication saved is expensive. For small exponents such as yours saving a squaring is not worth terribly much. Consequently, for small exponents don't expect to see much, if any, improvement from the better prime pairing.

Prime95 does factor all this into account but only for the "common" cases. Common is defined as B1 between 10K and 100M, B2/B1 between 20 and 200.

Have you considered using GMP-ECM for stage 2? It should be superior for exponents up to 50K or so.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 21:53.


Fri Dec 3 21:53:21 UTC 2021 up 133 days, 16:22, 0 users, load averages: 1.06, 1.20, 1.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.