20201206, 05:46  #1 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1001100100100_{2} Posts 
Schrödinger numbers (prime and composite in the same time)
Edit: Mod note: This thread splits from the "predict the 52nd mersenne prime". Sorry for forgetting to add the note.
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...5&postcount=47 https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...0&postcount=51 Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20201210 at 10:50 
20201207, 02:52  #2 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2^{4}×3×193 Posts 
He said "this is the number", he didn't say it's prime.
According with past information from his posts, this is either "not a prime number", or a "Schrödinger's Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20201207 at 02:55 
20201207, 04:06  #3  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{2}·5^{2}·7^{2} Posts 
Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20201207 at 04:07 

20201207, 07:35  #4 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2^{4}·3·193 Posts 
So, he succeed in
And you did 2^85 for it? Haha. I can't believe these We say in our language "Some idiot throws a stone in the lake, and a lot of wise men work so hard to take it out." 
20201207, 09:46  #5 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1324_{16} Posts 
When completed, an M852348659 PRP test may be the highest yet, and it takes about 16% less effort than Laurv's LL & DC combination on M666666667. https://www.mersenne.org/report_ll/?...exfactor=1&B1=
https://www.mersenne.org/report_prp/...exfactor=1&B1= Plus it provides the bonus of progress toward completing testing of every predict Mxx guess or dubious claim of primes in the forum threads, refuting unjustifiable claims. Today is the two year anniversary of discovery of Mp51*. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20201207 at 10:21 
20201207, 10:10  #6 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2^{4}·3·193 Posts 
NOOE: Am I a joke to you?
But mine looks nicer (and I chose it by myself, nobody fed me with it) Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20201207 at 10:13 
20201209, 00:36  #7  
Jan 2020
251_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I already knew M103,347,113 and M103,374,113 were composites, my group was having fun and didn't hook up to the Mersenne server in every location. Kriesel already tested 103,305,173 This exponent was just taken out of my list  https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...exp_hi=&full=1 Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20201209 at 00:51 Reason: Removed list. 

20201209, 00:50  #8 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
9,341 Posts 

20201209, 01:45  #10 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{2}×5^{2}×7^{2} Posts 
(Offtopic, no M52 guesses)
Those were gpuowl v7.1 results, so manual assignments. PrimeNet treats all manual assignments as one heap (presumably one virtual computer), regardless of how many gpus or systems they came from. That's what I see in assignments reports and results reports, cpus reports etc. https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/ says thresholds pertain to a computer, not to a user account. The issue I had with being unable to reserve some 54M LL DC was on an i78750H running primenetconnected prime95 v30.3b6. That has over 11,500 GhzD credit (6670 in past year). Its reliability & confidence figures in the detailed cpu report are 0.99 and 10 respectively; 33 work units in the last year. But 54315733 reserved ok on another system. (Dual12core Xeon) Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20201209 at 01:50 
20201209, 01:53  #11  
Jan 2020
251_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I have 2,318.3 GHz Days now and what assignment category am I in now?. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20201209 at 01:55 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Always composite numbers?  sweety439  sweety439  4  20200215 07:55 
Condition on composite numbers easily factored  baih  Factoring  16  20190929 15:48 
Factoring composite Mersenne numbers using Pollard Rho  jshort  Factoring  9  20190409 16:34 
Schrödinger's Cat  Peter Nelson  Lounge  33  20090714 01:04 
Factoring highly composite Mersenne numbers  philmoore  Factoring  21  20041118 20:00 