![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jul 2003
2·3 Posts |
![]()
when you 1st start the LL test prime95 says
"chance of finding a factor is an estimated X.XX%" what do most people get for the X.XX% |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jul 2003
2·3 Posts |
![]()
50 people read this and no one posts a single thing...:(
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
100101001012 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jul 2003
2×3 Posts |
![]()
ummmm...yeah that also.....LOL
my bad so when testing a number what are the steps? factoring 2^x P-1 factoring then what? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Dec 2002
Frederick County, MD
2×5×37 Posts |
![]()
After the program finishes trial factoring (factoring 2^x) and p-1 factoring, if a factor is not found, it will perform the Lucas-Lehmer (LL) test. The idea for factoring is that maybe we can find a small factor of the number to show that the number is not prime, so we don't have to perform the LL test, because the LL test can take from several weeks to several months, depending on the computer and depending on the exponent.
And if the LL test starts, it has to get all the way to 100% to determine if the number is prime or not. The LL test doesn't find factors, it just determines primality. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
![]()
The last P-1 test I saw start gave a probability something like 4.87%. It will vary with how much memory you allow prime95 to have (and probably other stuff).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Jul 2003
UK
1100112 Posts |
![]()
Just started doublechecking a 9M exponent
P-1 bounds B1=50000 B2=750000 Chance of finding a factor is an estimated 2.91% |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Oct 2002
Lost in the hills of Iowa
44810 Posts |
![]()
I think I usually get an estimate around 4.5%, but I'm NOT gonna stop and restart clients just to check - and I don't think Prime gives that estimate anyway at anytime other than the start of the P-1 1'st stage?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Aug 2002
23·52 Posts |
![]()
3.62% for M10979453 with bounds B1=60000, B2=1020000
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Jul 2003
2·3·5 Posts |
![]()
M10983677 B1=60000 B2=1110000 (64 bit level) 3.38%
M10983677 B1=55000 B2=907500 (65 bit level) 2.8% M10983677 B1=50000 B2=775000 (66 bit level) 2.31% Prime set to use 400MB of ram on all cases. So as you can see it all depends on how far that factor has been factored up to this point. The higher you go the less likely you are to find a factor, which makes sense. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING! | ewmayer | Information & Answers | 1 | 2019-04-05 03:13 |
Read-only error? | Xyzzy | Msieve | 2 | 2015-11-06 01:20 |
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING! | ewmayer | Lounge | 0 | 2006-04-12 18:48 |
I am sorry please read this | meeztamike | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2006-01-03 01:47 |
Please read!!!!! | andi314 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 1 | 2003-02-20 13:53 |