Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2019-08-04, 12:54 #1750 gjmccrac     Aug 2009 Ontario, Canada 3×43 Posts Primenet Graphs The following are some observations from the Primenet Graphs page https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/graphs.php 1) The TFLOP graph y-axis extends into -1000. The values of this should never go below zero so the y-axis min can be set at 0. 2) The Assignments graph has a downward trend happening on the LL values. Is this due to the fact that more people are doing PRP as the first time test vs LL? If so I would recommend either adding PRP to the graph or merge first time LL and PRP and label it as First Time instead of LL. The DC would then be LL-DC + PRP-DC.
2019-08-04, 16:48   #1751
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

1B6516 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by gjmccrac 2) The Assignments graph has a downward trend happening on the LL values. Is this due to the fact that more people are doing PRP as the first time test vs LL? If so I would recommend either adding PRP to the graph or merge first time LL and PRP and label it as First Time instead of LL. The DC would then be LL-DC + PRP-DC.
I changed the stored procedure to count LL+PRP and LLDC+PRPDC. You should see the effect tomorrow.

I did not change the graph text or axis.

2019-08-04, 17:39   #1752
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

2·5·293 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by gjmccrac 1) The TFLOP graph y-axis extends into -1000. The values of this should never go below zero so the y-axis min can be set at 0.
I have set vAxis.viewWindow.min = 0 for the TFLOP/s graph.

 2019-08-06, 13:30 #1753 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 10000011011112 Posts primenet api vs manual submissions It looks to me that automatically running and reporting via primenet api, prp results are recorded as unverified (reliable), while manually reported are recorded as unverified; the (reliable) is omitted, for manual results submissions, even though the Gerbicz check errors observed and reported are zero, and all errors counted and reported are zero. Primenet API example: https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...5731889&full=1 manual reporting examples (from prime95 v29.8b5): https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...7970567&full=1 https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...8575167&full=1 https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...3404713&full=1 https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...7232913&full=1 Their respective manual report contents (with AID, res2048, full res64 and security code omitted here on the forum but submitted fully on the manual results page): [Mon Aug 05 03:09:36 2019] {"status":"C", "exponent":97970567, "worktype":"PRP-3", "res64":"1A0D214F3F12C0__", "residue-type":1, "res2048":"omitted here", "fft-length":5505024, "shift-count":32264665, "error-code":"00000000", "security-code":"omitted here", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"29.8", "build":5, "port":4}, "timestamp":"2019-08-05 08:09:36", "errors":{"gerbicz":0}} https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=239 [Wed Jul 31 08:19:16 2019] {"status":"C", "exponent":103404713, "worktype":"PRP-3", "res64":"D5DFE866E919FC__", "residue-type":1, "res2048":"omitted here", "fft-length":5734400, "shift-count":368620, "error-code":"00000000", "security-code":"omitted here", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"29.8", "build":5, "port":4}, "timestamp":"2019-07-31 13:19:16", "errors":{"gerbicz":0}, "aid":"omitted here"} https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...6&postcount=26 (end)
2019-08-07, 00:10   #1754
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

23×409 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich I have set vAxis.viewWindow.min = 0 for the TFLOP/s graph.
Thanks to both of you for fixing those things. I did kind of throw the graphs together on a whim, and while I tried to make sure the floor was set right, I apparently didn't do a good enough job.

 2019-08-07, 04:36 #1755 GP2     Sep 2003 A1316 Posts Here's an odd case for PRP cofactor testing: M2919853 A new factor was found, and a first PRP cofactor test was done. But then an old, trivially small factor was "rediscovered". And that left this exponent in a kind of limbo: no second PRP cofactor test was ever scheduled. A couple of months later I did one manually, but it still left the exponent in a "Verified (Factored)" state instead of a double-green Verified state, even though there are two matching residues. In general, Primenet is not good at handling the "rediscovery" of trivially small factors that are so old that their discovery predates GIMPS itself.
2019-08-18, 09:06   #1756
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

Jun 2011
Thailand

5·11·157 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Happy Birthday Server!
Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV (me stressing it out) HAPPY BIRTHDAY SERVER!
Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Happy birthday Server!... hehe... Five years by now? (Edit: backup server, whatever... )
Happy Birthday Server !

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2019-08-18 at 09:09

 2019-08-30, 18:33 #1757 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 26·131 Posts I just got this error from the serve [URL's redacted]: Code: `[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] Updating computer information on the server [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] URL: http://v5.mersenne.org/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=uc&g.........&a=Wind [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] RESPONSE: [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] [Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]
 2019-09-05, 05:16 #1758 tha     Dec 2002 5·157 Posts This entry suggests a factor that should have been entered in the database long before was not until now. What could have caused that and are there more missing? https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...o=14419&full=1
2019-09-05, 07:19   #1759
GP2

Sep 2003

2,579 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by tha This entry suggests a factor that should have been entered in the database long before was not until now.
Some factors are so small that they were discovered before Primenet. They were in the database all along, but if someone "rediscovers" them and reports them, then they end up in the History log.

It's easy to see that the smallest factor of M14419 was known all along, because this exponent never had an LL test even though the second-smallest factor wasn't reported until 2008.

2019-09-05, 13:15   #1760
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

2×5×293 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by tha This entry suggests a factor that should have been entered in the database long before was not until now.
Which particular factor are you referring to? (I'm assuming the smallest one, 439058551). Most factors found before mid-2008 do not have specific date-of-discovery details recorded. But clearly it was known before the recent ECM result since three separate cofactor PRPs were performed in 2017 including this factor.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08 ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54 cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42 cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30 Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:42.

Fri Aug 7 01:42:13 UTC 2020 up 20 days, 21:28, 1 user, load averages: 1.60, 1.68, 1.69