mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-08-04, 12:54   #1750
gjmccrac
 
gjmccrac's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Ontario, Canada

3×43 Posts
Default Primenet Graphs

The following are some observations from the Primenet Graphs page https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/graphs.php

1) The TFLOP graph y-axis extends into -1000. The values of this should never go below zero so the y-axis min can be set at 0.

2) The Assignments graph has a downward trend happening on the LL values. Is this due to the fact that more people are doing PRP as the first time test vs LL? If so I would recommend either adding PRP to the graph or merge first time LL and PRP and label it as First Time instead of LL. The DC would then be LL-DC + PRP-DC.
gjmccrac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-04, 16:48   #1751
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

1B6516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gjmccrac View Post

2) The Assignments graph has a downward trend happening on the LL values. Is this due to the fact that more people are doing PRP as the first time test vs LL? If so I would recommend either adding PRP to the graph or merge first time LL and PRP and label it as First Time instead of LL. The DC would then be LL-DC + PRP-DC.
I changed the stored procedure to count LL+PRP and LLDC+PRPDC. You should see the effect tomorrow.

I did not change the graph text or axis.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-04, 17:39   #1752
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

2·5·293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gjmccrac View Post
1) The TFLOP graph y-axis extends into -1000. The values of this should never go below zero so the y-axis min can be set at 0.
I have set vAxis.viewWindow.min = 0 for the TFLOP/s graph.
James Heinrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-06, 13:30   #1753
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

10000011011112 Posts
Default primenet api vs manual submissions

It looks to me that automatically running and reporting via primenet api, prp results are recorded as unverified (reliable), while manually reported are recorded as unverified; the (reliable) is omitted, for manual results submissions, even though the Gerbicz check errors observed and reported are zero, and all errors counted and reported are zero.
Primenet API example: https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...5731889&full=1

manual reporting examples (from prime95 v29.8b5):
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...7970567&full=1
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...8575167&full=1
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...3404713&full=1
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...7232913&full=1

Their respective manual report contents (with AID, res2048, full res64 and security code omitted here on the forum but submitted fully on the manual results page):

[Mon Aug 05 03:09:36 2019]
{"status":"C", "exponent":97970567, "worktype":"PRP-3", "res64":"1A0D214F3F12C0__", "residue-type":1, "res2048":"omitted here", "fft-length":5505024, "shift-count":32264665, "error-code":"00000000", "security-code":"omitted here", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"29.8", "build":5, "port":4}, "timestamp":"2019-08-05 08:09:36", "errors":{"gerbicz":0}}

https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=239

[Wed Jul 31 08:19:16 2019]
{"status":"C", "exponent":103404713, "worktype":"PRP-3", "res64":"D5DFE866E919FC__", "residue-type":1, "res2048":"omitted here", "fft-length":5734400, "shift-count":368620, "error-code":"00000000", "security-code":"omitted here", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"29.8", "build":5, "port":4}, "timestamp":"2019-07-31 13:19:16", "errors":{"gerbicz":0}, "aid":"omitted here"}

https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...6&postcount=26

(end)
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-07, 00:10   #1754
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

23×409 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I have set vAxis.viewWindow.min = 0 for the TFLOP/s graph.
Thanks to both of you for fixing those things. I did kind of throw the graphs together on a whim, and while I tried to make sure the floor was set right, I apparently didn't do a good enough job.
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-07, 04:36   #1755
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

A1316 Posts
Default

Here's an odd case for PRP cofactor testing: M2919853

A new factor was found, and a first PRP cofactor test was done. But then an old, trivially small factor was "rediscovered". And that left this exponent in a kind of limbo: no second PRP cofactor test was ever scheduled.

A couple of months later I did one manually, but it still left the exponent in a "Verified (Factored)" state instead of a double-green Verified state, even though there are two matching residues.

In general, Primenet is not good at handling the "rediscovery" of trivially small factors that are so old that their discovery predates GIMPS itself.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-18, 09:06   #1756
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

5·11·157 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Happy Birthday Server!
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
(me stressing it out)
HAPPY BIRTHDAY SERVER!
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Happy birthday Server!... hehe... Five years by now?
(Edit: backup server, whatever... )

Happy Birthday Server !

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2019-08-18 at 09:09
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-08-30, 18:33   #1757
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

26·131 Posts
Default

I just got this error from the serve [URL's redacted]:
Code:
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] Updating computer information on the server
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] URL: http://v5.mersenne.org/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=uc&g.........&a=Wind
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] RESPONSE:
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <!-- IE friendly error message walkround.        
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      if error message from server is less than   
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      512 bytes IE v5+ will use its own error     
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      message instead of the one returned by      
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      server.                                 --> 
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><style type="text/css">html,body{height:100%;padding:0;margin:0;}.oc{display:table;width:100%
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <p>
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]     URL: http://v5.mersenne.org/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=uc&.........&a=
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]     <br/>User name: 
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]     <br/>Group name: 
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] </p></p></div></div></div></body></html>
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] PnErrorResult value missing.  Full response was:
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <!-- IE friendly error message walkround.        
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      if error message from server is less than   
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      512 bytes IE v5+ will use its own error     
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      message instead of the one returned by      
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]      server.                                 --> 
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]                                                  
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><style type="text/css">html,body{height:100%;padding:0;margin:0;}.oc{display:table;width:100%
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] <p>
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]     URL: http://v5.mersenne.org/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=uc&.......&a=
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]     <br/>User name: 
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02]     <br/>Group name: 
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] </p></p></div></div></div></body></html>
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] Visit http://mersenneforum.org for help.
[Comm thread Aug 30 11:02] Will try contacting server again in 87 minutes.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-09-05, 05:16   #1758
tha
 
tha's Avatar
 
Dec 2002

5·157 Posts
Default

This entry suggests a factor that should have been entered in the database long before was not until now.

What could have caused that and are there more missing?

https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...o=14419&full=1
tha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-09-05, 07:19   #1759
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

2,579 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tha View Post
This entry suggests a factor that should have been entered in the database long before was not until now.
Some factors are so small that they were discovered before Primenet. They were in the database all along, but if someone "rediscovers" them and reports them, then they end up in the History log.

It's easy to see that the smallest factor of M14419 was known all along, because this exponent never had an LL test even though the second-smallest factor wasn't reported until 2008.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-09-05, 13:15   #1760
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

2×5×293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tha View Post
This entry suggests a factor that should have been entered in the database long before was not until now.
Which particular factor are you referring to? (I'm assuming the smallest one, 439058551). Most factors found before mid-2008 do not have specific date-of-discovery details recorded. But clearly it was known before the recent ECM result since three separate cofactor PRPs were performed in 2017 including this factor.
James Heinrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:42.

Fri Aug 7 01:42:13 UTC 2020 up 20 days, 21:28, 1 user, load averages: 1.60, 1.68, 1.69

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.