User TJAOI

[Miszka]

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

I think in all those cases, the NF result is return after the factor is already known (note the highlighting on the Date (F) column indicating which result was reported first). I think all these are artifacts of continuing factoring the bitrange beyond a known factor (sometimes Seth's own factor, sometimes somebody else's).
I don't think any of these are "bad results".

I have a lot of mistakes like that, too. They result, among others, from the fact that the found redundant composite factor is designated as NF, and not e. g. RF (redundant factor) and in the same bitrange another factor will be found (see attachment)