mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Other Stuff > Archived Projects > 3*2^n-1 Search

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-03-27, 11:34   #23
wfgarnett3
 
wfgarnett3's Avatar
 
"William Garnett III"
Oct 2002
Bensalem, PA

2×43 Posts
Default is LLR working right?

Is LLR working right?

I am using a Pentium III 600 Mhz.

For PRP, when I test the Riesel number:
465*2^300000-1,
it has a per iteration time of around 7.6 ms.

However, when I use this new LLR, it has a per iteration time of around 6.3 ms.

Is there something wrong?

regards,
william

Edit: here is the llrresults file:

[Sat Mar 27 06:32:50 2004]
Using IBDWT : Mersenne fftlen = 14336, Proth fftlen = 28672, Used fftlen = 28672

Last fiddled with by wfgarnett3 on 2004-03-27 at 11:35 Reason: additional info
wfgarnett3 is offline  
Old 2004-03-27, 12:24   #24
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

3×52×72 Posts
Default

Jean wrote Yahoo! primenumbers:

Quote:
So, this program uses IBDWT only if k <= 511 in non SSE2 code, and (alas...) k <= 31 in SSE2 code ; for larger k's, it works exactly like the previous LLR version, using Proth mode and rational bases FFT. But for really small k's, it is a major improvement:
So it is very small k <=31 on a SSE2 P4 that get's the maximum boost of about 400%
paulunderwood is offline  
Old 2004-03-27, 12:49   #25
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

71338 Posts
Default

Quote:
this program uses IBDWT only if k <= 511 in non SSE2 code
I wonder if Jean meant less than 256 which is 2^8 ...
paulunderwood is offline  
Old 2004-03-27, 16:54   #26
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

2×29×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maybeso
What about bumping the priority to maximum, and then stopping it. Would that help?

Bruce
No it wouldn't. The prorgam seems to start correctly, but the first iteration count comes out after 2-4 minutes.

Luigi
ET_ is offline  
Old 2004-03-31, 18:25   #27
Thomas11
 
Thomas11's Avatar
 
Feb 2003

111011101002 Posts
Default

Just one short note:

It seems that the "+016" bug happens under Windows only. I've tested some low n-values for k=5 and k=7 twice on a Athlon runing Windows and on a P4 running Linux. I've got some "+016" results on the Athlon/Windows but not on the P4/Linux.
As Paul already noted, the Res64 values are the same, so I expect it to be a bug in the screen/file output routine and not in the entire calculation.

Well, from the above I could also conclude that it is a problem of the Athlon. But I guess, that most of you, who encountered the same problem, are using P4 machines running some version of Windows ...

-- Thomas.

P.S.: Tomorrow my machine(s) will take an out-time, since due to maintenance work we will be out of electrical power the whole day. So, don't expect any new primes from my end for tomorrow
Thomas11 is offline  
Old 2004-04-12, 03:21   #28
wfgarnett3
 
wfgarnett3's Avatar
 
"William Garnett III"
Oct 2002
Bensalem, PA

2·43 Posts
Default next version LLR

Next version of LLR released with few bug fixes.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/primenumbers

regards,
william
wfgarnett3 is offline  
Old 2004-04-12, 11:37   #29
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

E5B16 Posts
Default

Thanks for the link William.

I am still having problems with "stop/continue" and starting LLR if a "save file" exists. A save file is created when you shutdown Windoze. I get around the problem by making sure no "save files" exist by use of the following dos batch file in C:\WINDOWS\Start Menu\Programs\StartUp\llr.bat

cd \paul\llr -- this will be different for you
del y*.*
del z*.*
llr.exe
exit

Jean Penne assure me that "stop/continue" does work after a time -- but to me it seems an inordinate amount of time!
paulunderwood is offline  
Old 2004-04-12, 11:55   #30
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

10010110011102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wfgarnett3
Next version of LLR released with few bug fixes.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/primenumbers

regards,
william
Waiting to download it from GIMPS

Luigi
ET_ is offline  
Old 2004-08-01, 22:24   #31
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

3×52×72 Posts
Default

Jean Penne is about make available the very latest LLR ( based on George Woltman's latest IBDWT library?) see here Also keep a look over the next few days for the new program at http://www.mersenne.org/gimps/ Jean claims to have fixed the stop/continue bug...

Big thanks to Jean and George

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2004-08-01 at 22:37
paulunderwood is offline  
Old 2004-08-01, 22:55   #32
Lupine1647
 
Lupine1647's Avatar
 
Jan 2004
Kansas City, Missouri

2×5 Posts
Default

All bow down to the great creators!!!!


Last fiddled with by Lupine1647 on 2004-08-01 at 22:55
Lupine1647 is offline  
Old 2004-08-02, 11:51   #33
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

2×29×83 Posts
Default

Fine!

I'll download it as soon as it is released!

Luigi
ET_ is offline  
 

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:59.

Sat May 15 23:59:53 UTC 2021 up 37 days, 18:40, 0 users, load averages: 1.57, 1.35, 1.35

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.