mersenneforum.org Primo
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2022-01-02, 01:39 #166 Jayder     Dec 2012 1000101112 Posts Is anybody currently working on the PRPs <= 3000? I may do a little or a lot of work, and I don't want to run into anyone.
 2022-01-02, 18:01 #167 chris2be8     Sep 2009 2·33·43 Posts I'm working on them from the bottom up. If you keep away from the lowest few hundred PRPs you should be OK (anything over 1500 digits should be safe for at least a month).
 2022-01-20, 19:30 #168 kruoli     "Oliver" Sep 2017 Porta Westfalica, DE 2×487 Posts Currently, I am running a certification on Sm(2445)*10^8677+Smr(2446). While the system I am running it on has a throughput of slightly above one 10k digit number per day, it now stands at 46806/57633 bits in phase 1 after more than a week (slightly above eight days). This is with the same number of threads as with the 10k candidates. Even if I assume that Primo operates in $$\mathcal{O}(\log(n)^{5+\varepsilon})$$ for small $$\varepsilon$$ instead of $$\mathcal{O}(\log(n)^{4+\varepsilon})$$, this seems way slower than it should be expected. Is my expectation flawed (maybe I computed the ETA wrong) or is there something else that could slow it done? I know that ECPP is non-deterministic algorithm and I might got an extreme sample here. Can somebody chime in if this might be the case?
2022-01-20, 19:39   #169
paulunderwood

Sep 2002
Database er0rr

23·179 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kruoli Currently, I am running a certification on Sm(2445)*10^8677+Smr(2446). While the system I am running it on has a throughput of slightly above one 10k digit number per day, it now stands at 46806/57633 bits in phase 1 after more than a week (slightly above eight days). This is with the same number of threads as with the 10k candidates. Even if I assume that Primo operates in $$\mathcal{O}(\log(n)^{5+\varepsilon})$$ for small $$\varepsilon$$ instead of $$\mathcal{O}(\log(n)^{4+\varepsilon})$$, this seems way slower than it should be expected. Is my expectation flawed (maybe I computed the ETA wrong) or is there something else that could slow it done? I know that ECPP is non-deterministic algorithm and I might got an extreme sample here. Can somebody chime in if this might be the case?
I found log^4 is a good rule of thumb. Have you selected max settings on the certification page? 11k dd? (?). Things will speed up! I know it can be disheartening to watch it backtrack, A watched kettle never boils!

 2022-01-20, 19:41 #170 kruoli     "Oliver" Sep 2017 Porta Westfalica, DE 97410 Posts Yes, I used 11k digits and the maximum setting in the other field. Watching it is only fun when it has sped up considerably towards the end of phase 1.
2022-01-21, 05:38   #171
Batalov

"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

7·23·61 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kruoli Watching it is only fun when...
... you pressed the button "Start".
You job was already done then.

Unless you also watch the paint dry. (assuming you ever painted walls)

 2022-02-17, 16:39 #172 chris2be8     Sep 2009 2·33·43 Posts @Ray Chandler, would you mind moving to slightly larger numbers? My script has reached 1519 digits and I've seen it try to process some numbers you had just submitted certificates for. It would avoid the bad case of us both generating certificates for the same number at the same time.
2022-02-19, 03:25   #174
EdH

"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009

119616 Posts

Quote:
Did you unpack them first? Did they look like:
Code:
[PRIMO - Primality Certificate]
Version=4.3.0 - LX64
WebSite=http://www.ellipsa.eu/
Format=4
ID=B3F5C051930D8
Created=Feb-26-2019 11:45:39 PM
TestCount=321
Status=Candidate certified prime

Put here any comment...

[Running Times (Wall-Clock)]
1stPhase=6709s
2ndPhase=1902s
Total=8611s

[Running Times (Processes)]
1stPhase=24918s
2ndPhase=7447s
Total=32365s

[Candidate]
. . .

2022-02-19, 03:40   #175
sweety439

"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

3,373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by EdH Did you unpack them first? Did they look like: Code: [PRIMO - Primality Certificate] Version=4.3.0 - LX64 WebSite=http://www.ellipsa.eu/ Format=4 ID=B3F5C051930D8 Created=Feb-26-2019 11:45:39 PM TestCount=321 Status=Candidate certified prime [Comments] Put here any comment... [Running Times (Wall-Clock)] 1stPhase=6709s 2ndPhase=1902s Total=8611s [Running Times (Processes)] 1stPhase=24918s 2ndPhase=7447s Total=32365s [Candidate] . . .
I unpack the .gz files, and find a folder containing a .certif file, I change the ".certif" to ".zip" and uploaded them to factordb

2022-02-19, 04:20   #176
paulunderwood

Sep 2002
Database er0rr

23×179 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by sweety439 I unpack the .gz files, and find a folder containing a .certif file, I change the ".certif" to ".zip" and uploaded them to factordb

gunzip the .gz files. Then zip the .certif up to .zip. No need to rename anything

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2022-02-19 at 04:25

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post PawnProver44 Information & Answers 14 2016-04-09 05:49 WraithX Software 15 2013-09-10 07:24 wblipp FactorDB 1 2012-05-28 03:16 Cybertronic Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem 17 2009-08-13 20:42 fivemack Math 35 2009-04-28 15:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:29.

Mon May 16 19:29:53 UTC 2022 up 32 days, 17:31, 1 user, load averages: 1.67, 1.45, 1.38