mersenneforum.org 110 digits subproject?
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 View Poll Results: Should there be a 110 digits subproject? Yes 9 69.23% No 2 15.38% Yes, but not at the same time as #3 2 15.38% Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

 2009-10-10, 13:21 #1 10metreh     Nov 2008 2×33×43 Posts 110 digits subproject? I have come up with the idea of a "110 digits" subproject, over a smaller range, to be done in parallel with #3. As I think just the opinion of the mods isn't enough to determine whether this will go ahead, I have posted this poll to find out what the general opinion is about this.
 2009-10-11, 08:44 #2 10metreh     Nov 2008 2×33×43 Posts The general opinion seems to be "yes", so anyone got ideas for a good range to do?
2009-10-11, 08:53   #3
Andi47

Oct 2004
Austria

1001101100102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by 10metreh The general opinion seems to be "yes", so anyone got ideas for a good range to do?
Do we have all sequences done to 110 digits in the ranges 1-100k and 100k-200k?

2009-10-11, 08:56   #4
10metreh

Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Andi47 Do we have all sequences done to 110 digits in the ranges 1-100k and 100k-200k?
No - sequence 10650 is the first below 110 digits.

BTW - Andi, were you the one who just voted for "not at the same time as #3"? The reason I was thinking to do them in parallel is so that there is always "easy" work around as well.

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-10-11 at 08:58

2009-10-11, 09:19   #5
Andi47

Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by 10metreh No - sequence 10650 is the first below 110 digits. BTW - Andi, were you the one who just voted for "not at the same time as #3"? The reason I was thinking to do them in parallel is so that there is always "easy" work around as well.
There are two votes for "not at the same time as #3", I was one of those votes. My suggestion would be to do everything below 1M to 100 digits first, but as the majority voted just "yes", we can do a range to 110 digit in parallel to #3 as well. For this I would vote for one of the "lower" ranges.

 2009-10-11, 10:01 #6 axn     Jun 2003 2·33·7·13 Posts If the objective is also to get more terminations, then we should target all sequences currently at 100+ digits without a driver (regardless of any range).
2009-10-11, 11:03   #7
10metreh

Nov 2008

1001000100102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by axn If the objective is also to get more terminations, then we should target all sequences currently at 100+ digits without a driver (regardless of any range).
Which is what we used to do, and you are still open to do it if you want. That's what the "Recommended Sequences" thread is there for.

 2009-10-13, 12:05 #8 Greebley     May 2009 Dedham Massachusetts USA 11010010112 Posts I voted yes, though it will slow down the other sub-project. I think getting 0-200 to 110 digits would be first.
2009-10-13, 16:11   #9
10metreh

Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Greebley I voted yes, though it will slow down the other sub-project. I think getting 0-200 to 110 digits would be first.
All right, considering taking a sequence to 110 digits takes a while longer, should we make it a 50k range instead?

Edit: or 40k (10k-50k)

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-10-13 at 16:25

 2009-10-13, 18:39 #10 Greebley     May 2009 Dedham Massachusetts USA 15138 Posts 10k-50k seems a good start to me.
2009-10-13, 18:43   #11
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted

"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

426710 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Greebley 10k-50k seems a good start to me.
Why not 0k-50k? Or 0k-40k? I'm not really sure of how many below 10k are below 110 digits, but unless someone else is working on that section, might as well start at the bottom and go up.

I think it'd be good to run a section to 110 digits at the same time as Subproject 3.

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-10-13 at 18:44

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 185 2011-01-24 18:43 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 203 2010-11-14 15:00 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 345 2010-07-28 07:20 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 5 2010-05-20 14:34 henryzz Aliquot Sequences 697 2010-02-04 04:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:24.

Fri Apr 16 19:24:29 UTC 2021 up 8 days, 14:05, 1 user, load averages: 1.54, 1.70, 1.74