mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

View Poll Results: Should there be a 110 digits subproject?
Yes 9 69.23%
No 2 15.38%
Yes, but not at the same time as #3 2 15.38%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-10-10, 13:21   #1
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default 110 digits subproject?

I have come up with the idea of a "110 digits" subproject, over a smaller range, to be done in parallel with #3. As I think just the opinion of the mods isn't enough to determine whether this will go ahead, I have posted this poll to find out what the general opinion is about this.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-11, 08:44   #2
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default

The general opinion seems to be "yes", so anyone got ideas for a good range to do?
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-11, 08:53   #3
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

1001101100102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
The general opinion seems to be "yes", so anyone got ideas for a good range to do?
Do we have all sequences done to 110 digits in the ranges 1-100k and 100k-200k?
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-11, 08:56   #4
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
Do we have all sequences done to 110 digits in the ranges 1-100k and 100k-200k?
No - sequence 10650 is the first below 110 digits.

BTW - Andi, were you the one who just voted for "not at the same time as #3"? The reason I was thinking to do them in parallel is so that there is always "easy" work around as well.

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-10-11 at 08:58
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-11, 09:19   #5
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
No - sequence 10650 is the first below 110 digits.

BTW - Andi, were you the one who just voted for "not at the same time as #3"? The reason I was thinking to do them in parallel is so that there is always "easy" work around as well.
There are two votes for "not at the same time as #3", I was one of those votes. My suggestion would be to do everything below 1M to 100 digits first, but as the majority voted just "yes", we can do a range to 110 digit in parallel to #3 as well. For this I would vote for one of the "lower" ranges.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-11, 10:01   #6
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

2·33·7·13 Posts
Default

If the objective is also to get more terminations, then we should target all sequences currently at 100+ digits without a driver (regardless of any range).
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-11, 11:03   #7
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

1001000100102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
If the objective is also to get more terminations, then we should target all sequences currently at 100+ digits without a driver (regardless of any range).
Which is what we used to do, and you are still open to do it if you want. That's what the "Recommended Sequences" thread is there for.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-13, 12:05   #8
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

11010010112 Posts
Default

I voted yes, though it will slow down the other sub-project.

I think getting 0-200 to 110 digits would be first.
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-13, 16:11   #9
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greebley View Post
I voted yes, though it will slow down the other sub-project.

I think getting 0-200 to 110 digits would be first.
All right, considering taking a sequence to 110 digits takes a while longer, should we make it a 50k range instead?

Edit: or 40k (10k-50k)

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-10-13 at 16:25
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-13, 18:39   #10
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

15138 Posts
Default

10k-50k seems a good start to me.
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-13, 18:43   #11
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

426710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greebley View Post
10k-50k seems a good start to me.
Why not 0k-50k? Or 0k-40k? I'm not really sure of how many below 10k are below 110 digits, but unless someone else is working on that section, might as well start at the bottom and go up.

I think it'd be good to run a section to 110 digits at the same time as Subproject 3.

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-10-13 at 18:44
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subproject #7: 100k-150k sequences to 110 digits 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 185 2011-01-24 18:43
Subproject #6: 50k-100k sequences to 110 digits 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 203 2010-11-14 15:00
Subproject #4: 10k-50k sequences to 110 digits 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 345 2010-07-28 07:20
Another 100 digits subproject? 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 5 2010-05-20 14:34
Subproject #3: 700k-800k sequences to 100 digits henryzz Aliquot Sequences 697 2010-02-04 04:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:24.

Fri Apr 16 19:24:29 UTC 2021 up 8 days, 14:05, 1 user, load averages: 1.54, 1.70, 1.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.