|
2020-02-23, 15:10
|
#188 |
Jul 2003
10011001102 Posts |
hi,
i wanted to double check this range with prime95 |
|
|
|
2020-07-13, 20:29
|
#189 |
|
Jul 2003
2×307 Posts |
hi
for wagstaff numbers i do like to reserve the range 16400000 to 16600000 |
|
|
|
|
2020-07-13, 21:01
|
#190 | |
Sep 2006
The Netherlands
2×17×23 Posts |
Quote:
The odds of a PRP in Wagstaff between [n;2n] seems diverging - not converging - and if i may blindfolded guess it could be on average a gap of factor 3 between a group of PRP's and the next one. |
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-13, 21:44
|
#191 |
|
Jul 2003
2×307 Posts |
hi,
the range of 16400000 to 16600000 i can do in lifetime (in a few years) |
|
|
|
|
2021-06-30, 17:22
|
#192 |
|
Jul 2003
2·307 Posts |
hi,
i do cancel now my reservation for doing prp-tests on wagstaff numbers n=16400000-16600000 because another person is doing that range (ryanp) i will do more trial factoring on wagstaff numbers http://deep.alotspace.com/ |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Wagstaff PRP exponents | ryanp | Wagstaff PRP Search | 26 | 2013-10-18 01:33 |
| Hot tuna! -- a p75 and a p79 by Sam Wagstaff! | Batalov | GMP-ECM | 9 | 2012-08-24 10:26 |
| Wagstaff Conjecture | davieddy | Miscellaneous Math | 209 | 2011-01-23 23:50 |
| Best settings to factor Wagstaff p = (2^n +1) / 1 | diep | GMP-ECM | 10 | 2010-07-26 21:33 |
| 30th Wagstaff prime | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2007-09-04 07:10 |
