mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2017-06-06, 17:27   #1486
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

63158 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 I think it would be a good idea to strategically double-check at least half of this users exponents. Based on the data that comes back, we might then double-check the other half.
I've got a query already setup that will pull the smallest unassigned exponent for a particular year/month of any matching criteria (in this case a specific CPU). It comes in handy for spot checking...

Here's that list, in chronological order.

Code:
Exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	worktodo
43191191	0	14	7	DoubleCheck=43191191,72,1
45537641	0	2	3	DoubleCheck=45537641,72,1
41953489	0	4	7	DoubleCheck=41953489,72,1
46388297	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=46388297,72,1
44405707	0	1	4	DoubleCheck=44405707,72,1
43518661	0	7	2	DoubleCheck=43518661,72,1
42316943	0	2	6	DoubleCheck=42316943,72,1
41721523	0	4	3	DoubleCheck=41721523,72,1
47556689	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=47556689,72,1
44258833	0	2	1	DoubleCheck=44258833,72,1
44169109	0	2	6	DoubleCheck=44169109,72,1
45602677	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=45602677,72,1
45414253	0	1	7	DoubleCheck=45414253,72,1
45414401	0	4	2	DoubleCheck=45414401,72,1
44095913	0	5	3	DoubleCheck=44095913,72,1
43849327	0	3	6	DoubleCheck=43849327,72,1
40289297	0	8	3	DoubleCheck=40289297,72,1
45591499	0	8	1	DoubleCheck=45591499,72,1
46157549	0	2	3	DoubleCheck=46157549,72,1
50928337	0	1	14	DoubleCheck=50928337,73,1
43220833	0	1	8	DoubleCheck=43220833,72,1
50752483	0	1	7	DoubleCheck=50752483,73,1
48738539	0	0	10	DoubleCheck=48738539,72,1
43454707	0	1	14	DoubleCheck=43454707,72,1
43482251	0	4	10	DoubleCheck=43482251,72,1
45921341	0	1	11	DoubleCheck=45921341,72,1
50505359	0	2	12	DoubleCheck=50505359,73,1
50488463	0	2	17	DoubleCheck=50488463,73,1
50737123	0	0	8	DoubleCheck=50737123,73,1
50513509	0	0	24	DoubleCheck=50513509,73,1
47880529	0	1	2	DoubleCheck=47880529,72,1
53644573	0	1	22	DoubleCheck=53644573,73,1
51220769	1	3	17	DoubleCheck=51220769,73,1
50419043	0	2	31	DoubleCheck=50419043,73,1
50051017	1	2	17	DoubleCheck=50051017,73,1
47304703	0	3	27	DoubleCheck=47304703,72,1
51781361	1	1	14	DoubleCheck=51781361,73,1
51466607	1	4	17	DoubleCheck=51466607,73,1
55061443	0	0	23	DoubleCheck=55061443,73,1
55109911	0	0	9	DoubleCheck=55109911,73,1
55329581	0	0	17	DoubleCheck=55329581,73,1
54430973	0	0	18	DoubleCheck=54430973,73,1
51223423	0	0	24	DoubleCheck=51223423,73,1
60475829	0	0	6	DoubleCheck=60475829,74,1
51914539	0	0	22	DoubleCheck=51914539,73,1
51916897	0	2	14	DoubleCheck=51916897,73,1
58945283	0	1	17	DoubleCheck=58945283,73,1
56899343	0	0	17	DoubleCheck=56899343,73,1
57421031	0	0	28	DoubleCheck=57421031,73,1
60002291	1	2	19	DoubleCheck=60002291,74,1
62647661	0	1	13	DoubleCheck=62647661,74,1
58907749	1	5	11	DoubleCheck=58907749,73,1
61500731	7	6	11	DoubleCheck=61500731,74,1
55897211	5	9	19	DoubleCheck=55897211,73,1
61222081	6	4	7	DoubleCheck=61222081,74,1
60939001	0	2	21	DoubleCheck=60939001,74,1
61037629	2	2	16	DoubleCheck=61037629,74,1
63181423	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=63181423,74,1
63530827	0	0	15	DoubleCheck=63530827,74,1
63683693	0	0	14	DoubleCheck=63683693,74,1
63683929	0	0	10	DoubleCheck=63683929,74,1
63683621	0	0	14	DoubleCheck=63683621,74,1
65062643	0	0	17	DoubleCheck=65062643,74,1
64681307	0	0	14	DoubleCheck=64681307,74,1
66229081	0	0	19	DoubleCheck=66229081,75,1
66698507	2	2	8	DoubleCheck=66698507,75,1
72629587	2	2	4	DoubleCheck=72629587,75,1
72629749	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=72629749,75,1
67854097	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=67854097,75,1
75059249	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=75059249,75,1
67854053	0	0	12	DoubleCheck=67854053,75,1
68360059	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=68360059,75,1
68699989	0	0	8	DoubleCheck=68699989,75,1
72893761	0	1	16	DoubleCheck=72893761,75,1
73829731	0	0	6	DoubleCheck=73829731,75,1
73656907	0	0	7	DoubleCheck=73656907,75,1
77486791	0	8	3	DoubleCheck=77486791,75,1
77486441	0	3	4	DoubleCheck=77486441,75,1
78212009	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=78212009,75,1
78431653	0	1	3	DoubleCheck=78431653,75,1

2017-06-06, 21:25   #1487
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

29×113 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 I think it would be a good idea to strategically double-check at least half of this users exponents. Based on the data that comes back, we might then double-check the other half.
By the way, I just thought of this and it would be a little bit of a "cheat" but we could "persuade" the general masses to do strategic double-checking by marking potentially wrong results as "suspect" and make them available for first-time checks.

When a computer itself encounters certain errors and turns in a suspect result, that's exactly what happens anyway... in this case we'd be doing what *should* have happened and mark it as suspect so it's checked again much sooner.

I think I saw that a "suspect" result has a 50/50 chance of being correct, if I remember what I found when analyzing the error codes... I think the lists we're pulling of "probably bad" is actually better than that at spotting bad results.

Anyway, just a thought, although it might mess up some reporting where we've already crossed several milestones for first-time checks, but suddenly marking a bunch as suspect and available for a "new first time check" would gum things up for a bit.

2017-06-06, 21:40   #1488
GP2

Sep 2003

A1516 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo By the way, I just thought of this and it would be a little bit of a "cheat" but we could "persuade" the general masses to do strategic double-checking by marking potentially wrong results as "suspect" and make them available for first-time checks.
But the "general masses" will just churn and expire those strategic exponents. We want them to actually get done, and in a timely fashion. Hence this thread.

2017-06-07, 02:14   #1489
ewmayer
2ω=0

Sep 2002
República de California

9,791 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GP2 The triple checks on exponents 53648893, 53648981, 53648423, 53647547 will finish within a few hours, in that order. The first one is already at 51M and the slowest is almost at 49M. All interim residues are still matching.
I see the first 3 matched my Mlucas-on-overheating-Ryzen-system results - what is ETA on the fourth?

2017-06-07, 04:04   #1490
GP2

Sep 2003

29·89 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ewmayer I see the first 3 matched my Mlucas-on-overheating-Ryzen-system results - what is ETA on the fourth?
As of right this very instant, it's 99.72% complete... so in about 40 minutes from now.

2017-06-07, 04:37   #1491
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

29×113 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GP2 But the "general masses" will just churn and expire those strategic exponents. We want them to actually get done, and in a timely fashion. Hence this thread.
Most of them would be sub category zero (if that's a thing...)

2017-06-07, 21:15   #1492
ewmayer
2ω=0

Sep 2002
República de California

9,791 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GP2 As of right this very instant, it's 99.72% complete... so in about 40 minutes from now.
And, I see we match on that one as well. Thanks for jumping on these - big relief to know I haven't been wasting all those Ryzen cycles David Stanfill has generously gifted me with. (Not even in the subpar-performance sense, as on Ryzen I get ~90% the throughput of mprime, avx2-builds for both.)

 2017-06-13, 20:26 #1493 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 29·113 Posts Here's a short list... this machine has been trending towards the "bad" side of the equation, now with overall stats of 20 bad, 21 good. Below is a list of the smallest available exponent for any month where the bad>=good (and it might mean no bad/no good). It'll help fill in some unknowns about when the system started to rot... seems like around late 2010 but there are gaps there where no DC's have been done yet. Code: Exponent Bad Good Unk worktodo 41654687 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=41654687,72,1 44526941 0 0 1 DoubleCheck=44526941,72,1 46594763 0 0 7 DoubleCheck=46594763,72,1 46708141 2 0 2 DoubleCheck=46708141,72,1 47521781 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=47521781,72,1 50613733 1 1 3 DoubleCheck=50613733,73,1 50896471 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=50896471,73,1 52944533 1 1 2 DoubleCheck=52944533,73,1 53674261 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=53674261,73,1 55885723 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=55885723,73,1
 2017-06-14, 15:27 #1494 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 29×113 Posts I don't know if it's just me, but I found one of the user names in this exponent report to be hilarious in its honesty: M46205657 That's the 2nd bad result from I've seen from it (it doesn't have any more outstanding).
2017-06-19, 01:50   #1495
storm5510
Random Account

Aug 2009
U.S.A.

22·401 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo I don't know if it's just me, but I found one of the user names in this exponent report to be hilarious in its honesty: M46205657 That's the 2nd bad result from I've seen from it (it doesn't have any more outstanding).
I see where you ran another DC on June 14. There must be something 'flaky' going on with his hardware. Of course, this is just a guess on my part.

I suppose a lot of what he/she ran will need to be checked...

Last fiddled with by storm5510 on 2017-06-19 at 01:52

2017-06-19, 15:25   #1496
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

29×113 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by storm5510 I see where you ran another DC on June 14. There must be something 'flaky' going on with his hardware. Of course, this is just a guess on my part. I suppose a lot of what he/she ran will need to be checked...
Yeah, I did a spot check of another one but it matched, so maybe I just hit a few bad ones as a result of my triple-checking.

I may check it out again or just do another roundup of "maybe bad, but let's test one more and see" kind of work.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 50 2017-10-30 19:16 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 02:53.

Wed Oct 21 02:53:11 UTC 2020 up 41 days, 4 mins, 0 users, load averages: 1.36, 1.60, 1.63