mersenneforum.org Prime95 beta version 28.3
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2014-01-29, 04:23   #45
lalera

Jul 2003

22×149 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner Were you unable to upload at- http://www.mersenne.org/manual_result/ ?
i tried often to upload at http://www.mersenne.org/manual_result/
but the server does not take it

 2014-01-29, 04:56 #46 kladner     "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 22×3×72×17 Posts What messages are you getting from the server? EDIT: I'm not sure that I will have answers, but I am trying to ask some of the right questions. There might be responses from people who know more, by the time we have enough data collected. EDIT2: Those Who Know have stepped in while I was tweaking my comments. Last fiddled with by kladner on 2014-01-29 at 05:05
2014-01-29, 05:01   #47
lalera

Jul 2003

10010101002 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner What messages are you getting from the server?
i get this message:
No factor lines found: 0
Mfaktc no factor lines found: 0
Mfakto no factor lines found: 0
CUDAPm1-factor lines found: 0
CUDAPm1-nofactor lines found: 0
Factors found: 0
P-1 lines found: 0
LL lines found: 0
Mlucas lines found: 0
Glucas (G29) lines found: 0
Glucas lines found: 0
MacLucasFFTW lines found: 0
CUDALucas lines found: 0
clLucas lines found: 0
ECM lines found: 0

2014-01-29, 05:02   #48
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

112·59 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by lalera username : america64 i do use v28.3 i reserved M65378393 for p-1 at gpu72 and i can not upload the result P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=545000, B2=10355000, E=12. UID: ANONYMOUS, M65378393 has a factor: 53709915590644747022698801 (P-1 B1=545000, B2=10355000, E=12)
Delete everything in the parentheses. I'll debug the manual web page.

 2014-01-29, 05:12 #49 lalera     Jul 2003 11248 Posts i sent the following: P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=545000, B2=10355000, E=12. UID: ANONYMOUS, M65378393 has a factor: 53709915590644747022698801 and the Report of the server is: No factor lines found: 0 Mfaktc no factor lines found: 0 Mfakto no factor lines found: 0 CUDAPm1-factor lines found: 0 CUDAPm1-nofactor lines found: 0 Factors found: 1 Processing result: M65378393 has a factor: 53709915590644747022698801 Insufficient information for accurate CPU credit. For stats purposes, assuming factor was found using P-1 with B1 = 800000. CPU credit is 2.9322 GHz-days. P-1 lines found: 0 LL lines found: 0 Mlucas lines found: 0 Glucas (G29) lines found: 0 Glucas lines found: 0 MacLucasFFTW lines found: 0 CUDALucas lines found: 0 clLucas lines found: 0 ECM lines found: 0
 2014-01-29, 23:54 #50 TheMawn     May 2013 East. Always East. 11·157 Posts Code: [Mon Jan 27 22:16:17 2014] Iteration: 20656201/32482543, POSSIBLE ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.40625) > 0.40 Continuing from last save file. [Mon Jan 27 22:32:16 2014] Disregard last error. Result is reproducible and thus not a hardware problem. For added safety, redoing iteration using a slower, more reliable method. Continuing from last save file. Another one. Twice in twelve DC's. Both errors were actually fine, so I'm not really worried in that regard. Again, just letting you know. All twelve DC's matched perfectly, so I have swapped my regular work to version 28.3.
 2014-02-01, 06:06 #51 bayanne     "Tony Gott" Aug 2002 Yell, Shetland, UK 13716 Posts I have had 2 factors which were not reported. I have sent an e-mail to George.
 2014-02-03, 20:28 #52 lavalamp     Oct 2007 London, UK 24348 Posts Using version 28.3 of Prime95 on both an Ivy Bridge (3570k) and Haswell (4570) system, I find that the Haswell system is significantly slower at stage 1 ECM, about 40% slower clock-for-clock. I've attached a screenshot, but basically, the 3.4 GHz Haswell takes ~47k seconds for 1 curve, while the 4.3 GHz Ivy Bridge takes 26.2K seconds. 3.4 * 47 / (4.3 * 26.2) = 1.418 So 42% extra time accounting for clock speed. The Haswell system has slightly faster RAM and runs no other tasks, while the Ivy Bridge system has me pestering it most of the time. They have the same size L1/2/3 CPU caches. I do not know why there should be such a big difference in performance (and had I known it was such a big gap I would have got another Ivy Bridge!). If anyone can shed light on this I'd be interested. Attached Thumbnails
2014-02-03, 21:11   #53
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

112×59 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by lavalamp Using version 28.3 of Prime95 on both an Ivy Bridge (3570k) and Haswell (4570) system, I find that the Haswell system is significantly slower at stage 1 ECM.
I will look into it. Have you tried setting CPUSupportsFMA3=0 in local.txt? Have you tried 27.9?

 2014-02-03, 22:02 #54 lavalamp     Oct 2007 London, UK 22×3×109 Posts I don't have a record to back this up, but I think v27.9 ran at the same speed. I do have numbers to show that v28.1 also ran at this speed. I've set CpuSupportsFMA3=0 in local.txt and started it up again (still v28.3), it will be several hours before it's possible to see the effect though, so I'll report back tomorrow.
 2014-02-04, 07:55 #55 lavalamp     Oct 2007 London, UK 51C16 Posts Doesn't seem to have had an effect unfortunately. It was part way through 3 curves when I started it last night, all of which have now finished. But the time it took to run the remaining proportion of the curves is still around the same 47k seconds / curve level.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Jean Penné Software 111 2015-01-26 21:41 Prime95 Software 20 2014-03-02 02:51 Prime95 Software 126 2012-02-09 16:17 Prime95 Software 33 2005-06-14 13:19 Prime95 PSearch 15 2004-09-17 19:21

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:30.

Thu Oct 29 16:30:39 UTC 2020 up 49 days, 13:41, 2 users, load averages: 2.25, 2.07, 1.92

Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.