![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Apr 2017
2 Posts |
![]()
Hey there. I will ask my question directly.
n= some 1523 digits number. I want to check 10^n+7 is prime or not. I have used BigInteger class of c#, and I found that one factor of n is 11, that remains a 1522 digits number. However it seems it will be very long like a lifetime with a standard isPrime() function. Is there any way to do that quickly? (I am open to rent a super computer or something like that) Code:
n= 39639600000000033079722130334105193516374462454515382070790605358914985114125041349652662917631491895468078068144227588488256698643731392656301687065828647039364869335097585180284485610320873304664240820377108832285808799206086668871981475355607012901091630830301025471386040357260999007608336089976844194508766126364538537876281839232550446576248759510420112471055243135957657955673172345352299040688058220310949388025140588819053919947072444591465431690373800860072775388686735031425736023817399933840555739331789612967251075090969235858418789282170029771749917300694674164737016209063843863711544823023486602712537214687396625868342705921270261329804829639431028779358253390671518359245782335428382401587826662256037049288785974197816738339397949057227919285478001984783327820046311610982467747270922924247436321534899106847502480979159775057889513728084684088653655309295401918623883559378101223949718822361892160105855110817069136619252398279854449222626529937148527952365200132318888521336420774065497849818061528283162421435659940456500165398610651670525967581872312272576910353953026794574925570625206748263314588157459477340390340721137942441283493218656963281508435329143235196824346675487925901422428051604366523321204101885544161429043996030433344359907376778035064505458154151505127356930201786304995038041680449884220972543830631822692689381409196162752232881243797552100562355276215679788289778365861726761495203440291101554746940125702944095269599735362222957327158451869004300363876943433675157128680119087 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
1,621 Posts |
![]()
No number of the form \(10^n+7\) is divisible by 11.
See, for example, these tests: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisibility_rule |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Apr 2017
2 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26·131 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
20C016 Posts |
![]()
okay so which number's totient value is 11 ( if it can even happen edit:turns out it can't via istotient in PARI/gp) ? that should help you eliminate/prove a few factors of 10^n+7.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2017-04-17 at 12:04 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
1,621 Posts |
![]()
To get a general feel for what is possible, you could read this overview, which mentions several of the projects here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genera...er_field_sieve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
24·271 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure how factoring the exponent might help here, but I'm also not sure it won't ;-) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
20C016 Posts |
![]() Quote:
one part is even one part is odd so it doesn't divide by 2. both parts are 1 mod 3 so it doesn't divide by 3, the value is 2 mod 5 so it doesn't divide by 5. 3^n for any value n is not divisible by 7 so it won't divide by that. 11 has already shown not to divide into it. (-3)^n mod 13 cycles -3,9,-1,3,-9,1,-3 and none of these are -7 ( or +6 the equivalent) so it doesn't divide by 13. 17 produces (-7)^n+7 which goes 0,5,4,11,13,16,12,6,14,9,10,3,1,15,2,8, ... repeats which means if the exponent were 1 mod 16 it would divide however the exponent is 15 mod 16 it looks like. etc. edit:and once I felt like doing it it took under 1 minute to check all the way up to 2^30 that no primes divided it ( PARI/GP is pretty slow though at times). Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2017-04-17 at 14:11 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
26·31 Posts |
![]()
A 1.5 k dd number should be matter of hours(if not minutes) with primo.
You will get a certificate if prime. Don't necessarily give you the factor though. Last fiddled with by a1call on 2017-04-17 at 14:48 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·3·5·311 Posts |
![]() Quote:
You can find a factor for 10^n+7 by modular exponentiation but if not (which is fairly likely), then you will be stuck with the other two alternatives. What is so special about that 10^n+7, though, - can you tell? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
111038 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Consider that Prime95 tests numbers of magnitude 10^{8 digits}, or the very smallest 10^{9 digits}; then consider how long a prp test would take for 10^{1520+ digits}. Finding a factor to show compositeness is OP's only hope. Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2017-04-17 at 18:38 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bug with particular large number | VolMike | YAFU | 18 | 2012-04-09 21:39 |
Wagstaff number primality test? | ixfd64 | Math | 12 | 2010-01-05 16:36 |
newbie question - testing primality of very large numbers | NeoGen | Software | 8 | 2006-03-20 01:22 |
is GGNFS checking for SNFS number? | Washuu | Factoring | 10 | 2005-08-11 05:09 |
checking smaller number | fortega | Data | 2 | 2005-06-16 22:48 |