![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
41128 Posts |
![]()
I started to clear out the PRPs again and right now it's a losing battle. There are 60,000+ less than 3000 digits, with hundreds ranging from 18-299. Someone is obviously spamming the DB right now.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
643 Posts |
![]()
Is it cmd again? Although cmd's banned from MersenneForum, he/she might still have access to the DB. Maybe cmd's taking revenge on us for being banned. It's just a theory, though, no proof.
EDIT: The DB is offline right now, saying "Creating backup, offline for ~1 hour", so it should be back up soon. Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 2016-02-15 at 17:20 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
3·787 Posts |
![]()
factordb will automatically prove everything under 300 digits. Sustained factors in that range usually means the worker dedicated to that task is not functioning for some reason. Sometimes it comes back on it's on, sometimes an email to Markus helps.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts |
![]()
All the local workers were on line and running, I was just pointing out that someone was spamming the DB faster than the sub-300s could be cleared. It looks like they're clear now, but the 300-3000 backlog is almost at 60,000. As soon as I finish the range I'm running in the Amicable number search, I'll run some more certificates to help clear it up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Sep 2003
32·7·41 Posts |
![]()
Request: can someone run the recently-discovered 1472-digit PRP cofactor of M5233 through Primo and submit the certificate to factordb?
I had trouble with Primo as it seems to be GUI only, and the only Linux machines I have access to are virtual machines with a command line interface. Also, the binary-only executable seems to want some additional libraries to be installed... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
111008 Posts |
![]()
I've not done a non-trivial Primo proof, but I did set up and test the software last fall, so I should be able to fire up this certificate tomorrow.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Sep 2003
32·7·41 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Dec 2012
11616 Posts |
![]()
Is anybody having issues uploading certificates? It has been a long time since I've done this, so maybe I'm doing something wrong. I took all of the .out files (1000 of them) and put them in a .zip. It tells me that 0 certificates are found. If I try uploading a single certificate, it doesn't take it and only returns with a period as a message: "."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Sep 2008
Kansas
22·32·7·13 Posts |
![]()
If you are using the latest Primo v.4.2.1, factordb doesn’t recognize them. The verifier supposedly would check them but it appears the parser, or gatekeeper, won’t allow them to be passed to the verifier. I don’t know of a site that archives the older Primo v.4.1.1.
I have dozens of certs in the 1000-5000 digit range but I don’t know of a way to convert them to the older format for verification. Arg! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Dec 2012
11616 Posts |
![]()
That would be the case. Thank you for telling me. The latest I have is 4.0.1. Anybody have anything later?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fixup Old Primo Certificate? | wblipp | FactorDB | 1 | 2012-05-28 03:16 |
Invalid certificate? | IvanP | FactorDB | 3 | 2012-05-11 12:17 |
Could Moore's law be purposely used for marketing purposes? | jasong | Science & Technology | 10 | 2007-01-19 19:04 |
certificate of appreciation | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 13 | 2004-04-28 06:24 |