20201031, 16:08  #650 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2^{2}×5×181 Posts 
Since there wasn't other interest, I'm working both ends of the orange area toward the middle now for base 162, so I guess that whole section can be attributed to me at the next update. They won't all be green yet, but some have already made the change.

20201101, 01:03  #651 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}·3^{2}·7·13 Posts 
I am performing preliminary work on Tables 220 and 284.
It appears 284^3 has merged. 
20201101, 02:24  #652 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2^{2}·5·181 Posts 

20201101, 09:53  #653 
Oct 2011
461 Posts 
I'm really sorry.
It's totally impossible to do the update ! Already last week, it had been very laborious to scan factordb : it was very long compared to usual ! But today, I can't even scan base 3, it blocks for a while. It's very long for each exponent. I don't know what's going on ? This does not prevent us from continuing our calculations. But we have to watch the posts since post #640 of the last update to be sure not to do the same calculations as someone else. Thank you all for your help ! I will take into account all your requests in the next update. But this next update will only be partial if the problem remains ! Last fiddled with by garambois on 20201101 at 10:01 Reason: additional clarification 
20201101, 10:03  #654 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
9E9_{16} Posts 
Looks like someone flooded factordb with thousands of small composites.
http://factordb.com/stat_1.php 
20201101, 10:08  #655 
Oct 2011
715_{8} Posts 

20201101, 10:11  #656  
Oct 2011
715_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I don't know what to do ? Should I try again today ? Last week, there was a similar problem ? 

20201101, 13:28  #657 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2^{2}·5·181 Posts 
There is work being done on the db and all sequences will rebuild when accessed at some point, so everything will be quite slow.
On a bright note, Syd has informed me that he has fixed the three broken sequences and all the base 72 issues, so once we are able to access it again in a reasonable way, you should be able to add the base 72 table. I haven't been able to verify anything and will be out today, but will check either later or tomorrow. 
20201101, 14:07  #658 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
3·13·31 Posts 

20201101, 15:07  #659  
Oct 2011
111001101_{2} Posts 
Quote:
Thank you very much for this very very very good news !!! A lot of thanks to Syd !!! I'm just going to do a quick update for the few bases for which you reported changes to me : bases 2, 3, 20, 21, 23, 162, 439, 496. For the addition of bases 72, 220 and 284, I will wait to hear from you... 

20201101, 15:55  #660 
Sep 2008
Kansas
6314_{8} Posts 
I did some work on base 29. Bases 220 and 284 will be ready at the next update.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 