mersenneforum.org Certificate : For all indents and purposes
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2017-04-25, 00:07 #188 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 32·52·17 Posts @pakaran: I am about to turn machines back toward the PRPs. At this point there is not an overwhelming number of PRPs below 3300 dd. I will work on numbers 3000 dd and above unless I see 2999 and below reaching a couple thousand. If that happens, I'll watch for a while and then possibly move my lower bound down a bit if the growth continues, or if you request help in that area.
 2017-04-29, 16:00 #189 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns EF116 Posts The region below 3000 dd has surpassed 2000 entries. If it's still growing by tomorrow, I'll move my lower bound down to 1500 dd and try to clear that area out again. (Unless, of course, someone requests me not to...)
2017-04-30, 11:59   #190
EdH

"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009

32·52·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by EdH The region below 3000 dd has surpassed 2000 entries. If it's still growing by tomorrow, I'll move my lower bound down to 1500 dd and try to clear that area out again...
The region is still growing, so I've moved down to 1500 dd...

 2017-04-30, 20:23 #191 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 32·52·17 Posts There are now over 2000 entries below 996 dd. If I haven't heard anything against me working them by noon tomorrow (Monday) USA Eastern time, I will move my lower bounds to 996.
 2017-05-02, 18:00 #192 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 32×52×17 Posts Since I have still heard no info against my bold downward trend and there is still an increasing influx of new PRPs at the lower end, I'll once again move my machines to work even lower. This time I'll move down to 994 dd, since it still leaves over 2000 below that mark.
 2017-05-03, 14:41 #193 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 32×52×17 Posts I see pakaran has submitted a good sized group of certificates and the region below 2000 dd is only a little over 2000 entries, so I'm moving my lower bound back up to 2000 dd for now...
2017-05-04, 02:58   #194
EdH

"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009

1110111100012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by EdH I see pakaran has submitted a good sized group of certificates and the region below 2000 dd is only a little over 2000 entries, so I'm moving my lower bound back up to 2000 dd for now...
Hmm, I seem to have miscued one of my machines and it ran a bunch of 1xxx before I caught it. Sorry if I bumped anyone. I'm (I think) back above 2000 for now with all of the machines.

 2017-05-06, 14:55 #195 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 32×52×17 Posts @pakaran: I'm not sure where you're working and haven't seen anything being turned in recently. Since we've got almost 3000 PRPs below 1000 dd, I'm looking at lowering my lower bound again. I'll wait until tomorrow noon to see if there is any dissent, and then, if I read none, I'll move down to 1000, followed by a further lowering, if the numbers warrant it.
 2017-05-07, 00:35 #196 pakaran     Aug 2002 3718 Posts Go for it. I went inactive for awhile. I've just started a run on the lowest 1000 numbers, but those will be no higher than 992 DD, just eyeballing. I'll post if I get near moving beyond that point.
2017-05-07, 01:08   #197
EdH

"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009

382510 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pakaran Go for it. I went inactive for awhile. I've just started a run on the lowest 1000 numbers, but those will be no higher than 992 DD, just eyeballing. I'll post if I get near moving beyond that point.
OK, I'll move my low end to 1000 dd tonight and then take another look after I get those knocked down a bit.

Thanks for your update. (Welcome back!)

Edit: After looking over the bulk of PRPs, I decided to go ahead and aim a bit lower since you said you were within the 992 dd area at your top end. I'll drop down to 995. That leaves a few hundred between your top and my lower bounds.

Last fiddled with by EdH on 2017-05-07 at 01:25

 2017-05-11, 01:55 #198 EdH     "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 32×52×17 Posts Anyone with a suggestion?: Code: [Candidate 1] Input=primo_1100000000294457850.in ... Status=Failed, impossible to certify the candidate Just in case, I ran all the bases which resulted in no change from PRP. I didn't try the UGS=1 that worked for the error code, since this isn't the same form of message. Should I? Thanks for any thoughts...

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post wblipp FactorDB 1 2012-05-28 03:16 IvanP FactorDB 3 2012-05-11 12:17 jasong Science & Technology 10 2007-01-19 19:04 Unregistered Information & Answers 13 2004-04-28 06:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:04.

Wed Jul 28 03:04:15 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 21:33, 0 users, load averages: 1.75, 1.81, 1.76