mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Linux

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2023-03-12, 18:12   #1
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

26×43 Posts
Default Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS Updates

Ubuntu did another large update today. When it completed, it presented a new dialog which stated three items were to be removed. One of the options was "Remind me later." This is the once I chose. The title of the dialog was "Updates to be installed." A command button was marked "Install." I have a good setup which has run with no issues. I would rather not mess it up. I really do not know what the intent of the dialog is, remove or install. The next time it appears, I will attempt to do an image capture.
storm5510 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-12, 18:43   #2
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

32×173 Posts
Default

What does apt list --upgradable give? It will list possible updates.
kruoli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-12, 23:14   #3
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

1010110000002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
What does apt list --upgradable give? It will list possible updates.
Just three:

Quote:
python3-software-properties
software-properties-common
software-properties-gtk
Perhaps these are the same as in the dialog. I should have made a note of them.
storm5510 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-13, 19:11   #4
M344587487
 
M344587487's Avatar
 
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017

2·11·43 Posts
Default

Removing packages is not uncommon, if you didn't remove a program prior (which might orphan a library which for whatever reason could not be removed at the same time) then it's probably just a refactoring or replacement of some functions that eliminated the need for a certain package. get removed automatically often on my machine, presumably yours too.

If you've ever installed complex programs without using the package manager then you're right to be cautious about removing random packages, the dependencies of these programs are not tracked. So odd things like XML/font/glue libraries being removed might suddenly make a particular program no longer work.

In your case apt search describes the packages as "manage the repositories that you install software from", so it's a core OS function that's probably been refactored and is safe to update. Knowing Canonical they might have "conveniently" re-enabled snap if it's been disabled.
M344587487 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-14, 00:51   #5
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

26·43 Posts
Default

It ran another small update today for Thunderbird Mail and Ubuntu Core. I remember seeing something about "snap" recently, but not the details.

I use this setup for CADO-NFS exclusively. In the past, I have run mprime, mfaktc, and msieve.

Some of the text in CADO-NFS screen output lines seem different than from before the last few updates. I may be wrong, but I would not think an OS upgrade would change anything directly related to a single application. This could just as easily be something I never noticed before. No, I don't sit and stare at it. Just an occasional glance to see if it is still running properly.

It has not repeated the removal request. It is all running fine, and I will leave it alone.
storm5510 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-14, 00:57   #6
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

1129410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
It has not repeated the removal request. It is all running fine, and I will leave it alone.
How's Levi?
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-14, 01:02   #7
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

2·5·677 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
It is all running fine, and I will leave it alone.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Jim: Hey Bob, my computer says it needs to update. What should I do?
Bob: Is your stuff working okay?
Jim: Yup. Looks fine.
Bob: Then ignore it.
Jim: But what if it is something important?
Bob: If it's important you will already know about it.
Jim: But it might be some new awesomeness I am missing out on.
Bob: If it was so awesome you would already know about it.
Jim: But the computer says do, so I should obey, right?
Bob: Then go for it Jim. If everything breaks then it's on you.
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-03-14, 01:03   #8
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

53008 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
How's Levi?
Off-topic here. New post in "Your Favorite Pest."

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina
If it aint broke then don't fix it.
Exactly!

Last fiddled with by storm5510 on 2023-03-14 at 01:05
storm5510 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-05-27, 12:21   #9
M344587487
 
M344587487's Avatar
 
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017

2·11·43 Posts
Default

That's true to a point, but updating at least every other LTS isn't a bad idea. 4 years is a long time for progress to be made on improving popular FOSS software. Take gedit as a minor but relevant example, the version in Ubuntu 20.04 has an annoying visual bug when editing a file over 1000 lines long (sometimes the entire output is shifted, it looks like one line but when your cursor goes to it it's a different line and lines only update when the cursor is at it). It got fixed years ago but the fix was never picked up by the maintainer of 20.04's gedit as it is relatively rare and doesn't completely break. But if you encounter it often it's painful. Ubuntu 20.04's repos will be littered with examples like that. Also rusticl is coming to mesa and might be able to replace rocm from v23.2 as the opencl driver to use for some possibly all cards, but it'll never come to 20.04.

Even if you ignore user programs as everything is working fine for you, the kernel improves a lot in 4 years. BTRFS with zstd compression and deduplication is a killer feature for me, for others it'll depend on what files they're working with. BTRFS got a nice improvement in 6.3 and it'll tangentially get another one in some months when zstd is updated. Then there's io_uring, which can make certain types of I/O much more efficient. Then there's 4 years of improvements to hardware support, particularly important if you rely on the drivers built into the kernel for GPU which have improved dramatically for AMD and intel (iGPU). Then there's 4 years of accumulated minor optimisations like the one for csum coming in 6.5.
M344587487 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-05-27, 18:47   #10
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

26×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M344587487 View Post
That's true to a point, but updating at least every other LTS isn't a bad idea...
Only in some cases. The last time I tried updating to 22.04, CADO-NFS refused to compile. Apparently, it could not find what it needed. I have left it as is with 20.04.4 LTS. Once compiled, the frequent update patches do not seem to affect it.
storm5510 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-05-27, 21:35   #11
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·5,647 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M344587487 View Post
That's true to a point, but updating at least every other LTS isn't a bad idea.
I tend to agree. But storm5510 also has a strong point.

It it 'aint broken, don't fix.

I'm currently working in a space where security is (of course) paramount. "New features (even timezone updates) are far from our primary concern.

Can you "Zero day" me over TCP/IP? Even on the same subnet?

Bring it on.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any updates please ? Aillas XYYXF Project 11 2020-04-05 12:38
Updates Baumann Eduard Information & Answers 5 2012-10-25 18:44
result updates?? timespy Information & Answers 3 2009-04-28 20:26
nfsnet.org updates Nichtwahr NFSNET Discussion 16 2007-04-27 14:45
Stats updates SandStar NFSNET Discussion 7 2004-07-03 22:59

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:35.


Thu Jun 1 16:35:21 UTC 2023 up 287 days, 14:03, 0 users, load averages: 2.31, 1.47, 1.27

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔