mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-09-25, 05:10   #254
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

17·281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
What did filtering finally say was the total unique relations? I've had tens of thousands of these but still manage to have enough good relations out of the remaining 200M+ to build a matrix.

I still think someone is hacking the BOINC batch files and submitting previous results for a different job to "pad" their stats. No one seems to be able to identify it.

Here is a related post to getting tons of error -11.
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...61&postcount=2
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-25, 13:57   #255
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

100100100102 Posts
Default 11611_144 factored

Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
Reserving 11611_144 on 14e.
Code:
p72 factor: 112045998427219090871953040117667258301569847152699559565607504451497301
p86 factor: 63264787949930725243445414832953024183897855766018170835974420877209157378834269266207
Approximately 47.1 hours on 2 threads Core i3-2310M with 4 GB memory for a 5.70M matrix at TD = 70. Log attached and log at https://pastebin.com/KsDS7zDh

Factors added to FDB.
Attached Files
File Type: log msieve.log (29.1 KB, 13 views)
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-26, 06:41   #256
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

17218 Posts
Default

In a poly, the deg: line is indeed superfluous, but I usually let it in when it's there.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-26, 11:19   #257
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

13·193 Posts
Default

I've downloaded .poly/.fb/.ini files from 50009_239 and run job with good old factMsieve.pl - it goes well and produces legal relations. Let's try queue slightly modified poly (deg and lss params were removed, m changed to Y0/Y1 as in others polys) for small range (say, 20M-30M) and see if it helps.

Code:
n: 500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009
skew: 1.62
c6: 1
c0: 18
Y0: -10000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Y1: 1
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
unconnected is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-26, 11:37   #258
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

17218 Posts
Default

Well... Multiple near-repdigit numbers have used "m:" lines over time just fine on both RSALS and NFS@Home, so there's something else going on
I haven't yet managed to convince myself that it's time to resieve, but maybe I'm just dense.

In the DB, I noticed that there was another, older entry mistakenly named 50009_239 (should have been "50009_238"), which reads:
Code:
(1131,1489406743,1489407441,1489407441,
'50009_239','50009_239',4,0,0,'Near-repdigit','SNFS','','n: 500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009\r\nm: 5000000000000000000000000000000000000000\r\ndeg: 6\r\nc6: 16\r\nc0: 45\r\nskew: 1.19\r\ntype: snfs\r\nlss: 1\r\nrl
im: 120000000\r\nalim: 120000000\r\nlpbr: 30\r\nlpba: 30\r\nmfbr: 60\r\nmfba: 60\r\nrlambda: 2.7\r\nalambda: 2.7\r\n',20000000,120000000,120000000,'239.40',30,'Dmitry Domanov: p55 * p75 * p110',0,2,6248,'',6285
215001,109771593,'HGSCp9xB')
https://pastebin.com/HGSCp9xB matches http://stdkmd.com/nrr/c.cgi?q=50009_238 .
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-26, 11:52   #259
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

13·193 Posts
Default

Lionel, that's the point! We've sieved job for 50009_238 once again, I've checked this by running current dataset with 50009_238 poly:
Code:
Msieve v. 1.54 (SVN 1025)
Wed Sep 26 11:43:59 2018
random seeds: 2bde25a4 300ea441
factoring 50000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009 (239 digits)
no P-1/P+1/ECM available, skipping
commencing number field sieve (239-digit input)
R0: -5000000000000000000000000000000000000000
R1: 1
A0: 45
A1: 0
A2: 0
A3: 0
A4: 0
A5: 0
A6: 16
skew 1.62, size 6.797e-12, alpha 0.213, combined = 4.894e-13 rroots = 0

commencing relation filtering
estimated available RAM is 7631.3 MB
commencing duplicate removal, pass 1
error -1 reading relation 9144250
read 10M relations
error -9 reading relation 11675596
error -1 reading relation 19265553
error -5 reading relation 19400233
read 20M relations
error -9 reading relation 24810475
error -15 reading relation 24810782
error -15 reading relation 26006753
...
So, it is necessary to resieve the whole 50009_239 job.

Last fiddled with by unconnected on 2018-09-26 at 11:53
unconnected is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-26, 12:05   #260
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Meh. In this case, some files were not regenerated. And IIRC, it's not the first time this occurs. Too bad we need to resieve.

We probably want to somehow help detect or prevent this on the production versions, before the never-worked-on queue management improvements ( https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=21356 ) become available.
Looks like the production code base has changes not available in the internal, privately shared version derived from the production code base over 2 years ago: a page linked from the management interface doesn't exist in the internal version...
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-27, 15:28   #261
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

B5016 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unconnected View Post
I've downloaded .poly/.fb/.ini files from 50009_239 and run job with good old factMsieve.pl - it goes well and produces legal relations. Let's try queue slightly modified poly (deg and lss params were removed, m changed to Y0/Y1 as in others polys) for small range (say, 20M-30M) and see if it helps.

Code:
n: 500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009
skew: 1.62
c6: 1
c0: 18
Y0: -10000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Y1: 1
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
Well I’ve test sieved this and it seems to work correctly. On 14e, yield is > 2.7 @Q=20M.

I’d be happy to enqueue this job as you describe over a small range, and then you can test the resulting .dat file. If it works, I can then increase the upper bound of Q to give the full result.

I assume you want me to delete the current job entitled “50009_239”, correct?

Last fiddled with by swellman on 2018-09-27 at 15:30
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-27, 15:38   #262
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

250910 Posts
Default

Yes, that's right. And please give a unique name for new job to not interfere with erroneous named 50009_239 task somewhere in database mentioned by Lionel.
unconnected is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-28, 00:19   #263
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

24·181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unconnected View Post
Yes, that's right. And please give a unique name for new job to not interfere with erroneous named 50009_239 task somewhere in database mentioned by Lionel.
Done.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-28, 11:46   #264
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

I've just expanded the upper bound for 50009_239A from 30M to 100M.

Also, Greg sent me a copy of the latest production code.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2018 15e post-processing reservations and results fivemack NFS@Home 221 2019-01-04 13:08
16e Post Processing Progress pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 8 2018-11-28 13:45
Crash doing large post-processing job wombatman Msieve 22 2013-12-04 01:37
Update on 7^254+1 post processing dleclair NFSNET Discussion 4 2005-04-05 09:51
Post processing for 2,757- xilman NFSNET Discussion 3 2003-11-06 14:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:01.

Wed Dec 2 07:01:31 UTC 2020 up 83 days, 4:12, 1 user, load averages: 1.10, 1.25, 1.36

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.