mersenneforum.org 2018 14e post processing reservations and results
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2018-09-11, 06:35 #221 debrouxl     Sep 2009 977 Posts The lss: line isn't there in the original polynomial from the near-repdigit Web interface, and as I wrote earlier in another topic, as long as the sieving side matches the usual recommended side implied by the type: line, the poly doesn't fail All of the other recent GNFS polys which are still fully visible in the 14e management page have a lss: line, but multiple SNFS polys, such as #1442 13601_61_minus1, don't, and siever on the grid clients don't fail on these polys.
2018-09-11, 09:21   #222
VictordeHolland

"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands

23×3×72 Posts
C164_159978_10262 factors

C164_159978_10262 factors

Code:
p79 factor: 4766810075511487434911465766569047757783816417278851092890204825135327119935063
p85 factor: 4713139448874607477535005971654558298593994738547653012328478882915430001345704087049
7.2M matrix (TD=110)

(Truncated) log attached and at: https://pastebin.com/1xRf4PLm
Attached Files
 C164_159978_10262.log (24.4 KB, 18 views)

 2018-09-11, 23:07 #223 VictordeHolland     "Victor de Hollander" Aug 2011 the Netherlands 23×3×72 Posts C215_46988659_29 (46988659^29-1)/46988658= Code: 65434296264879485831057770993488700245967650017100071066373555801095079019465292289811876502805313831172779822893945904680867232753021773924258110416408044145755384753131700041017654832754227289103683721688682472361 Is already in the Factordb: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00001060474966 It splits as: Code: p106: 4672601456018195178699471914588665537722988275510203132077093911934729158719497712508274838757971243020753 p110: 14003825680574946026452519246879959936758227574144910522162981447781462580995284001498760348577141562692776537 So maybe somebody else already did the postprocessing and didn't post it in this thread (or I haven't noticed).
2018-09-12, 00:22   #224
RichD

Sep 2008
Kansas

22×3×5×53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by VictordeHolland C215_46988659_29 (46988659^29-1)/46988658= Code: 65434296264879485831057770993488700245967650017100071066373555801095079019465292289811876502805313831172779822893945904680867232753021773924258110416408044145755384753131700041017654832754227289103683721688682472361 Is already in the Factordb: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00001060474966 It splits as: Code: p106: 4672601456018195178699471914588665537722988275510203132077093911934729158719497712508274838757971243020753 p110: 14003825680574946026452519246879959936758227574144910522162981447781462580995284001498760348577141562692776537 So maybe somebody else already did the postprocessing and didn't post it in this thread (or I haven't noticed).
It looks like I grabbed the wrong dataset when I did Phi_29(Phi_3(25457)/13). Can someone tell me the correct name for this job? I can't decipher it. It was just completed a couple days ago.

2018-09-12, 00:40   #225
RichD

Sep 2008
Kansas

61548 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by RichD It looks like I grabbed the wrong dataset when I did Phi_29(Phi_3(25457)/13). Can someone tell me the correct name for this job? I can't decipher it. It was just completed a couple days ago.
I found the queue request here but I don't remember seeing another dataset ending in _29.

 2018-09-12, 05:29 #226 debrouxl     Sep 2009 977 Posts C217_69655517_29, or more probably C216_49852639_29 ?
2018-09-12, 10:49   #227
VictordeHolland

"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands

23·3·72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by debrouxl C217_69655517_29, or more probably C216_49852639_29 ?
C217_69655517_29
Shows as FF in the Factordb:
http://factordb.com/index.php?query=69655517%5E29-1

C216_49852639_29
Is still CF in Factordb:
http://factordb.com/index.php?query=49852639%5E29-1

2018-09-12, 12:59   #228
RichD

Sep 2008
Kansas

22·3·5·53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by VictordeHolland C216_49852639_29 Is still CF in Factordb: http://factordb.com/index.php?query=49852639%5E29-1
That is the one that went by Phi_29(Phi_3(25457)/13) in the queue name. It shows completed as # 1355. Obviously, I grabbed the wrong dataset.

2018-09-13, 23:42   #229
VictordeHolland

"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands

23·3·72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by RichD That is the one that went by Phi_29(Phi_3(25457)/13) in the queue name. It shows completed as # 1355. Obviously, I grabbed the wrong dataset.
Does anybody got a copy of this dataset, I can't find it on the server?
Just to be sure: I'm looking for the relations of the C216 cofactor of 49852639^29-1 (the one that is displayed as factored but isn't) so we can clean this up.
Code:
 342979604182615255258693254421748108228322604383289993800565370414344839359283788981547172276819546740023979366342120920148747230565238271359993792909152771442330156630035414193369265772093168266608867254556175688641

 2018-09-14, 04:21 #230 RichD     Sep 2008 Kansas C6C16 Posts There doesn't seem to be any new relations coming in for C179_374xx231_19. Probably old WUs from previously submitted work that expired. I started this job building a matrix at TD=96 with just over 400 hours remaining.
2018-09-14, 04:31   #231
RichD

Sep 2008
Kansas

22·3·5·53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by VictordeHolland C215_46988659_29 (46988659^29-1)/46988658= Code: 65434296264879485831057770993488700245967650017100071066373555801095079019465292289811876502805313831172779822893945904680867232753021773924258110416408044145755384753131700041017654832754227289103683721688682472361 Is already in the Factordb: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00001060474966 It splits as: Code: p106: 4672601456018195178699471914588665537722988275510203132077093911934729158719497712508274838757971243020753 p110: 14003825680574946026452519246879959936758227574144910522162981447781462580995284001498760348577141562692776537 So maybe somebody else already did the postprocessing and didn't post it in this thread (or I haven't noticed).
Victor should be credited with this job since he reserved and processed the job correctly. I will start the sieving locally (for the correct job) in a couple months since I am over subscribe at the moment.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post fivemack NFS@Home 221 2019-01-04 13:08 pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 8 2018-11-28 13:45 wombatman Msieve 22 2013-12-04 01:37 dleclair NFSNET Discussion 4 2005-04-05 09:51 xilman NFSNET Discussion 3 2003-11-06 14:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:56.

Wed Dec 2 05:56:08 UTC 2020 up 83 days, 3:07, 1 user, load averages: 2.82, 2.25, 2.24