![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Apr 2005
3 Posts |
![]()
would it be possible to "convert"
GF(211921F4A73A3761B88323D6A34DF9E984D08FF25C491DF5DB3251310FAB9C36ACE903E01D41B9BF1EA5CBEAA79FD1D7036835E45933E34825B87C9AB45C2C4F^1) to GF(2), for utilizing Coppersmith's index-calculus ? eg, convert from one GF representation to another, with all numbers converted to GF2, espeically the polynomial etc. Best Regards, Bud |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Nov 2003
164448 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I will assume that the large hex number is prime. At least it is odd ![]() What do you mean by "convert"?? You are not changing representations within a fixed field; you are asking about some (hypothetical) relation between GF(p) and GF(2)??? You can conduct an index calculus attack on GF(p) by the number field sieve. The field given above would require a massive effort. Good luck. Can you clarify? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Apr 2005
3 Posts |
![]()
Dear Dr Silverman,
Perhaps this is a stupid question, but the question is: Is it possible to convert modular arithmetices (espcially) discrete logs in prime fields GF(p) to GF(2) representation ? Like if we have an diskrete log like a^x mod p = b (which is to solve for x) in a prime field GF(p) - all parameters a,b,x,p elements of this field. Is there any possibility to convert those number to GF(2) like a,b elements in GF(2), p probably the irreducible polynomial, with the goal to solve the log in this field ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
May 2004
24·5 Posts |
![]()
Is your question the following?
Does there exist a polynomial-time reduction from the problem "Discrete log in GF(p)" to the problem "Discrete log in GF(2^n)" ? I put the 2^n in there because I know of an *extremely* efficient algorithm to compute discrete logs in GF(2) ![]() Dave |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Apr 2005
310 Posts |
![]()
Hello,
And thanks for the reply, the answer would indeed be yes, can we somehow translate our problem to GF(2) for usage of the powerful dlp solving algorithms which exists ? Are you talking about coppersmith's index-calculus ? Best Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
![]() Quote:
by "convert modular arithmetic in prime fields to GF(2) representation". What do you mean by "convert"? by "representation". All finite fields of a given order are isomorphic. Thus, any map from GF(a) to GF(b) will either be surjective or injective, depending on the size of the fields. There will never exist a 1-1 map unless the sizes are the same. The only time solving a discrete log in one field helps to solve a DL in another is if the first field is a sub-field of the second AND the target log in the second field is in the orbit of the generator used in the first field. May I suggest that you do some reading about the structure of Finite Fields? Lidl & Neiderreiter's book is superb. NFS *IS* an index calculus algorithm. One can solve logs in GF(p) with it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Apr 2004
Copenhagen, Denmark
11101002 Posts |
![]() Quote:
-- Cheers, Jes |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Feb 2005
111111002 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Nov 2003
22·5·373 Posts |
![]() Quote:
One must solve the matrix mod p-1, not just mod p. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Aug 2002
1010000002 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conversion GHz to GFLOPS? | preda | PrimeNet | 11 | 2017-12-02 21:51 |
v5 Server Conversion | compusion | Software | 3 | 2008-11-14 19:22 |
PS3 programmers(program conversion for pay?) | jasong | Programming | 5 | 2007-12-16 00:10 |
Units Conversion Puzzle | JHagerson | Lounge | 19 | 2005-11-24 05:38 |
Date conversion with Python | leifbk | Programming | 2 | 2005-01-26 23:00 |