mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-10-02, 20:16   #463
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

23·32·72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tha View Post
Can we download and test that version? Or should we wait for more wrinkles to be ironed out?
It's still George's development version, not yet ready for testing.
James Heinrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-05, 13:47   #464
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

19×311 Posts
Default

For M58793159, 3M fft length may be a bit too aggressive in prime95 v30.6b4; got roundoff error 0.4375 >0.4 at iteration 292709 on Celeron G1840.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 19:07   #465
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

2×3×127 Posts
Default

v30.6b4: If stage 1 GCD is disabled, the optimal B2 seems to always be calculated as 100*B1. The worktodo had another value for B2 and the usual multiplicator for same-sized exponents when stage 1 GCD is enabled is way lower.
kruoli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 20:02   #466
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

1DF816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
v30.6b4: If stage 1 GCD is disabled, the optimal B2 seems to always be calculated as 100*B1. The worktodo had another value for B2 and the usual multiplicator for same-sized exponents when stage 1 GCD is enabled is way lower.
ECM? Does this happen in 30.7? If so, what is the worktodo.txt entry?
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 20:04   #467
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23·7·137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
For M58793159, 3M fft length may be a bit too aggressive in prime95 v30.6b4; got roundoff error 0.4375 >0.4 at iteration 292709 on Celeron G1840.
0.4375 is not that scary (to me). However, you aren't near the 3M FFT limit. Please advise if more (and worse) errors occur as you move higher.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 20:10   #468
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

23×32×72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
ECM? Does this happen in 30.7? If so, what is the worktodo.txt entry?
Maybe when there's a new version released, George should post in the sticky thread of the previous version to let us lurkers know there's a new version on offer. I for one almost never browse the forum to see what's new, I just checked my watched threads when I get emailed.
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=27180
James Heinrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 20:31   #469
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

2×3×127 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
ECM? Does this happen in 30.7? If so, what is the worktodo.txt entry?
This was with P-1, e.g. Pminus1=1,2,27318307,-1,1200000,40500000,74. I'll retry with 30.7 soon. If you look at the exponent page of M27318307, you'll see I have two results there (mprime was killed by the kernel and the worktodo.txt content was still the same as of two days prior, I did not notice that before restarting and duplicated work that way, I thought WellBehavedWork would write the file more frequently; I digress). The first was before I added the stage 1 skip, the second one after, so it's definitely the same worktodo entry.
kruoli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 21:17   #470
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23×7×137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
This was with P-1, e.g. Pminus1=1,2,27318307,-1,1200000,40500000,74. I'll retry with 30.7 soon. If you look at the exponent page of M27318307, you'll see I have two results there (mprime was killed by the kernel and the worktodo.txt content was still the same as of two days prior, I did not notice that before restarting and duplicated work that way, I thought WellBehavedWork would write the file more frequently; I digress). The first was before I added the stage 1 skip, the second one after, so it's definitely the same worktodo entry.
FYI: 30.7 always skips stage 1 GCD for P-1 (you'll get it for free during stage 2 init)
FYI2: Brent-Suyama is no more.

Do you keep old save file around for possibly later increasing B2? Could this bug have something to do with picking up an old save file and increasing its bounds rather than a consequence of stage1gcd=0?

Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2021-10-10 at 21:21
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 21:21   #471
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

2FA16 Posts
Default

Ah, okay. So I cannot proceed to stage 2 when a factor would be found in stage 1? (Yes, this is not necessary for most use cases, just asking.)

The problem I described earlier does therefore not occur in 30.7, I just tested it, sorry for the tumult.
kruoli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 21:24   #472
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

13728 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
FYI2: Brent-Suyama is no more.
Sometimes things have to go. I think you mentioned that earlier.
Edit: I had the setting still active and the program wrote that it had used Brent-Suyama to the JSON file, maybe this should be ignored and not written to the result file? I'll delete the setting nonetheless, but I hope I do not forget to do this for all of my machines...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
Do you keep old save file around for possibly later increasing B2? Could this bug have something to do with picking up an old save file and increasing its bounds rather than a consequence of stage1gcd=0?
That's might be it! Because of running all jobs a second time (unintentionally), they were run two times with the same B1, the second time only resumed. I had not watched the machine for a while, otherwise I should have seen this. Shall I try this with 30.7, too?

Last fiddled with by kruoli on 2021-10-10 at 21:27 Reason: Additions.
kruoli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-10, 23:33   #473
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23×7×137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
Ah, okay. So I cannot proceed to stage 2 when a factor would be found in stage 1? (Yes, this is not necessary for most use cases, just asking.).
It can be done. Read undoc.txt regarding Stage1GCD setting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
That's might be it! Because of running all jobs a second time (unintentionally), they were run two times with the same B1, the second time only resumed. I had not watched the machine for a while, otherwise I should have seen this. Shall I try this with 30.7, too?
If you can reproduce a problem, I'll investigate a fix.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 15:24.


Sat Nov 27 15:24:46 UTC 2021 up 127 days, 9:53, 0 users, load averages: 1.58, 1.27, 1.14

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.