20100909, 22:38  #67  
Mar 2006
Germany
29×101 Posts 
Quote:
@Max: Please change the title for the condensed table: it says "Short table of all conjectures for bases ≤ 1030" but there're only tested bases and not all! Done on my side. There's a double "</tr>" after S483 again! Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 20100909 at 22:45 

20100909, 23:01  #68 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2·3·5·353 Posts 
OK, Max, 3 groups of changes are needed to your pages:
1. The title on your condensed scripted page needs to change to bases <= 1030. Oddly, lower down in the page, it shows <= 1030. 2. The word "all" needs to be removed from multiple places throughout the page plus in the link on the home page that takes you to the condensed page. 3. Remove the link to Karsten's page that is frequently not up to date and its related verbiage on the condensed scripted page. He will keep it for himself. Karsten, I've removed the duplicate </tr>. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20100909 at 23:04 
20100910, 00:38  #69  
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
3·2,083 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:


20100910, 00:57  #70 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×3×5×353 Posts 
Cool thanks.
But I've now decided to extend the project to base 1040. In a month I might make it base 1050. 
20100910, 05:40  #71  
Mar 2006
Germany
29×101 Posts 
Quote:
Or, make a file with a table of dates and the max. base number and read those in creating the CRUS tab, consider the current date of creation in the script and decide the value to fill in next! Another possibility: Link the maxbase number to Gary's emailaddress and everyone can ask him directly, which value is current! More suggestions? 

20100910, 06:08  #72 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×3×5×353 Posts 
Maybe extend the bases to 1M now so we don't have to extend again in our lifetime.
I can just hear people now: "Reserving Riesel base 987654 and Sierp base 123456 to n=25K". Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20100910 at 06:08 
20101120, 18:10  #73 
Nov 2009
2×5^{2}×7 Posts 
The Sierpinski side looks broken. After S560 it inserts bases none through S565 all but the base 2 links are white. S566 and on looks normal.

20101120, 18:39  #74 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
2^{2}·23·31 Posts 
It's Karsten's table with the problem. Must have bad HTML somewhere.
http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/tab/CRUS_tab.htm 
20101123, 20:11  #76 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2^{2}·7·233 Posts 
Would it make sense to split the Riesel and Sierpinski sections of CRUS_tab.htm into separate pages? It would be easier to compare them side by side.
I see that one difference between the two searches is that there is the "Sierpinski 2nd conjecture" aka "Prime Sierpinski Conjecture". Is there such a number on the Riesel side? 
20101123, 20:33  #77  
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
3·2,083 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Primes for proven bases  CGKIII  Conjectures 'R Us  46  20170103 17:31 
Proven PRPs?  Random Poster  FactorDB  0  20120724 10:53 
Poincare conjecture proven?  Nebob  Lounge  36  20100330 13:14 
Are Legendre symbols proven to be defective?  jasong  Math  67  20080420 15:01 
Has this been proven? ... 10^n + 1  monst  Math  16  20070806 13:14 