Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2021-11-05, 22:17   #2355
techn1ciaN

Oct 2021
U.S. / Maine

2048 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by techn1ciaN If you check out exponents for PRP-CF on the manual assignment page (or re-load any of your automatically fetched PRP-CF work from the replacement lines in https://www.mersenne.org/workload/), the work lines given look like ...
I have apparently misstated the issue. What I said initially is only true for the replacement work lines in your Assignments. The lines given by the manual assignment page actually look like:

Code:
PRP=[AID],1,2,[exponent],-1,99,0,"[known factor(s)]
If you load this, Prime95 sets residue type 5 automatically. So, there is no problem (not even with the P-1 tests_saved value) unless you are specifically trying to use the replacement work lines tool.

2021-11-05, 22:55   #2356
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

5×719 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by techn1ciaN only true for the replacement work lines in your Assignments
OK, that I can fix. I can either hardcode them to show base,type as 3,5, or just leave those two fields out entirely and let Prime95 act on its default behavior. I have opted for the latter (do not include these fields), same as manual assignment.

 2021-11-10, 09:24 #2357 S485122     "Jacob" Sep 2006 Brussels, Belgium 32·197 Posts www.mersenne.org down ? It worked until about 09:10 UTC. The server responds to pings and FTP but not to HTTP(S) requests. Last fiddled with by S485122 on 2021-11-10 at 09:33 Reason: FTP works
2021-11-10, 10:05   #2358
S485122

"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

33558 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by S485122 It worked until about 09:10 UTC. The server responds to pings and FTP but not to HTTP(S) requests.
OK again.
Thanks to whoever restored the service.

Last fiddled with by S485122 on 2021-11-10 at 10:07 Reason: thanks

2021-11-10, 17:29   #2359
techn1ciaN

Oct 2021
U.S. / Maine

8416 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich OK, that I can fix. I can either hardcode them to show base,type as 3,5, or just leave those two fields out entirely and let Prime95 act on its default behavior. I have opted for the latter (do not include these fields), same as manual assignment.
Just tested by checking out a PRP-CF assignment and loading it from my replacement work lines. Starts as intended now — thanks.

Might you also change tests_saved in these lines to 0, for full consistency with what the manual assignment page outputs?

2021-11-11, 00:41   #2360
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

5×719 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by techn1ciaN Might you also change tests_saved in these lines to 0, for full consistency with what the manual assignment page outputs?
As best I can see what the page is trying to do, it shows 0 if a decent amount of P-1 has already been done; if it hasn't then it shows 1 for PRP-DC and 2 for PRP. Whether this makes sense or not I don't know, I didn't write the logic and I'm not that knowledgeable on PRP assignments.

2021-11-11, 05:54   #2361
slandrum

Jan 2021
California

22·3·52 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich As best I can see what the page is trying to do, it shows 0 if a decent amount of P-1 has already been done; if it hasn't then it shows 1 for PRP-DC and 2 for PRP. Whether this makes sense or not I don't know, I didn't write the logic and I'm not that knowledgeable on PRP assignments.
I think what was being asked for - if the exponent has already been proven composite, then tests saved cannot be more than 0.

2021-11-11, 11:13   #2362
techn1ciaN

Oct 2021
U.S. / Maine

22·3·11 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by slandrum I think what was being asked for - if the exponent has already been proven composite, then tests saved cannot be more than 0.
This is essentially the idea. If someone is checking out an exponent for PRP-CF, then a full-length primality test will be run, by definition.

Of course, with how_far_factored=99, the issue should be purely cosmetic in all practical cases.

 2021-11-11, 11:37 #2363 S485122     "Jacob" Sep 2006 Brussels, Belgium 33558 Posts Exponent Status Distribution errors The Exponent Status Distribution (the menu Item "Current Progress / Work Distribution Map") has some wrong totals, for instance the PrimeNet Activity Summary dated 2021-11-11 10:00 UTC. The 10M range has a spurious exponent counted as having only one erroneous test. That is wrong since all exponents of that range have long been verified or factored. There is some logic error in the counting, I will illustrate it with 105M 106M range. - The number of untested exponents is 4, it is indeed the number of assigned first time tests. But the NO-LL count in the table is 3, one to low ! - The number of factored Mersennes is correct in the table. - The table has the correct total number of exponents (sum of the number of exponents for which the corresponding Mersenne number is prime, factored, verified composite, tested once, got an erroneous result and untested.) - I counted 4775 exponents with unverified test(s) (some with a mix of LL and PRP without Cert). The table has only 4769, 6 are missing. - I counted 14281 verified exponents (LL or PRP double checked or certified PRP.) The table counts 14288, 7 too many. The differences do add up to 0 in this range. Other range have too few assigned and available exponents : 3M is missing 1, 23M : 1, 30M : 1, 59M : 3, 60M : 2, 61M : 16, 62M : 1, 63M : 1, 64M : 1, 104M : 1, 106M : 13, 107M : 33, 108M : 30, 109M : 47, 110M : 27, 111M : 11, 112M : 13, 113M : 12, 114M : 7, 115M : 1, 122M : 1, 124M : 1, 126M : 29, 149M : 1, 150M : 1, 160M : 3, 164M : 1, 165M : 2, 166M : 5, 172M : 1, 177M : 1, 184M : 2, 185M : 2, 188M : 1, 190M : 1, 332M : 2, 333M : 1, 371M : 1, 385M : 1, 623M : 1 and 800M : 1. Some of those differences are quite persistent over months (others, more transient, might be due to cut-off issues.) There is at the moment no range with more assigned than available exponents (the ECM range is a special case), there have been some in the past.
 2021-11-16, 12:00 #2364 sdbardwick     Aug 2002 North San Diego County 19×37 Posts DB server might be having problems. Homepage opens, but anything involving DB seems to stall, including login. EDIT: Appears to be back online. Last fiddled with by sdbardwick on 2021-11-16 at 12:07
 2021-12-09, 19:51 #2365 slandrum   Jan 2021 California 22·3·52 Posts Problem with P-1 GHz days Definitely need new accounting for the new P-1 processes being tested in prime95/mprime. Attached Thumbnails

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08 ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54 cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42 cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30 Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:37.

Mon Jan 17 01:37:53 UTC 2022 up 177 days, 20:06, 0 users, load averages: 1.97, 1.30, 1.19