mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Math Stuff > Other Mathematical Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-11-07, 21:51   #12
mart_r
 
mart_r's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
you know...around...

37516 Posts
Default Take it, it's free

While this thread is still on the front page, let me drop this number here:
Code:
977501592599998899778899999999987869899997877899798979989989676889999889999899775899989798999998789769998994897988599999999988989899879989699897999798898997599889876898998999994977897978999988999939998887
It's a 204-digit prime number whose digital sum (1651) is larger than the digital sum of its cube (1639). I found it less than a day after my last post in this thread.
mart_r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2023-02-27, 20:19   #13
mart_r
 
mart_r's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
you know...around...

3·5·59 Posts
Default Fifth powers riddle

This could make for a nice puzzle, or at least serve as inspiration for further endeavors:
(assume all mentioned variables being positive integers)

For any base b, are there only finitely many numbers x not divisible by b such that the sum of digits of x is larger than the sum of digits of \(x^5\) (in base b)?
Or is there a threshold \(b_0\) above which all \(b > b_0\) can have infinitely many (or at least one) such solutions? (Is \(b_0\)=283 for fifth powers?)
Some solutions for \(b \leq 100\) (searched up to \(x=10^8\)):
Code:
 b  x
 8  4*
27  9*, 23
32  2*, 4*, 8*, 16*
39  177716
40  20*
53  8210
54  18*, 36*, 138*
55  31
60  42
64  16*, 32*, 48*, 245408*
72  36*
77  822816
79  16255431
90  299047
92  52881676
96  24*, 48*, 6600*, 17256*
98  7140*
* semi-trivial solutions, since b|x^5
For \(b > 100\), more and more non-trivial solutions appear (the next one is b=102, x=4767).
b=27 seems to yield the smallest non-trivial solution. Or might there be a smaller b for which such a solution can be found?

What about higher prime powers p? It is trivial to show that there are arbitrarily large bases b for which \(x \geq 3\) (mutually, all \(x^n\) for \(1 \leq n \leq p-1\)) is a solution whenever \(b=x^p+2-x\). Excluding all those trivial and semi-trivial solutions, for p=7 so far the smallest (in terms of b) non-trivial solution I found was b=492, x=121820.
Is it possible to find a non-trivial solution for larger p? Have I overlooked a way to trivially construct solutions?
mart_r is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raising groups of digits to powers, equalling itself Boltzmann brain Miscellaneous Math 2 2020-02-09 18:35
What powers your farm/cpu? Uncwilly Lounge 15 2010-03-31 07:13
Prime Powers plandon Math 7 2009-06-30 21:29
2^x using powers of e? nibble4bits Math 31 2007-12-11 12:56
Powers, and more powers Numbers Puzzles 3 2005-07-13 04:42

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:33.


Sun May 28 12:33:23 UTC 2023 up 283 days, 10:01, 0 users, load averages: 1.29, 1.23, 1.17

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔