![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Nov 2002
43 Posts |
![]()
What kind of daily performance/range for sieving can one expect from a P4 3 GHz w/ HT, 1 GB RAM.
Just curious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3·277 Posts |
![]()
I tested with an identical system and got nearly 300 kp/sec, so almost 26G per day.
btw.: P4s are very bad for sieving - a P3/800 is more than half that fast! ![]() I'd propose doing PRP tests instead, or combine both to increase overall throuphput. P.S.: Welcome aboard! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Nov 2002
43 Posts |
![]() ![]() I have a duallie PIII 733/133 that I'll put to use sieving, more than likely and I'll task the P4 3 GHz with the bigger chores available. Any suggestions for an AMD XP 1800+? I also have a Celeron 400, but I think it works well as a doorstop. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Jun 2003
3×5×107 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Citrix |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Apr 2003
22·193 Posts |
![]()
An AMD XP1800+ is a sieving machine. It will do more then 1G per hour.
The P4 is for PRP tests depending on the FFT len it will do a test in 2.5 to 4 hours. Also depending if you run something else on that machine. Lars Last fiddled with by ltd on 2005-06-29 at 20:33 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CPU performance counters, how to use them? | ldesnogu | Programming | 2 | 2009-02-22 13:45 |
ICC performance gain | testi | Msieve | 5 | 2008-11-20 03:00 |
64-bit performance of v25.6 | James Heinrich | PrimeNet | 11 | 2008-04-24 01:42 |
64 bit performance? | zacariaz | Hardware | 1 | 2007-05-10 13:08 |
LLR performance on k and n | robert44444uk | 15k Search | 1 | 2006-02-09 01:43 |