![]() |
![]() |
#155 | |
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto
2·3·7·17 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#156 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
111728 Posts |
![]()
Max-
I'm not sure what you mean. It's an open forum, after all! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#157 |
"Bo Chen"
Oct 2005
Wuhan,China
167 Posts |
![]()
There are some special effort at repunit number (10^n - 1).
Kurt Team (Bo Chen, Wenjie Fang, Alfred Eichhorn, Danilo Nitsche, Kurt Beschorner, et al. ) aim at factoring these number use snfs and gnfs, until last year we have polish most number snfs less than 300 and gnfs less than 200. Now we are factoring snfs less than 310 and gnfs less than 210. 10,337- gnfs 202 is within our reach, I have suggest the team to factoring this number after the relation collect of 10^459 - 1, a snfs 306 number. In principle, we could factor this gnfs 202 with 12 months. If Kurt and other members accept my suggestion, we will send Sam an email to reserve this number. Yousuke Koide concentrates at 10^n+1, where n is between 400 and 800, using method ecm and nfs. It would better if the duplicate effort could avoid. If you still want to factor this number, we will not select this number as our next target. I found 3,748+ c204 is also less than 210, perhaps you could factoring this number, I and Kurt have no interest to this number. Best regards, Bo Chen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#158 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×5×11×43 Posts |
![]()
We can get the new C202 done by summer, and I'd prefer to not see it wait 12 months for a factorization.
If the C202 goes well, we are likely to try 3,748- the same way: with a combination of CADO work from forumites and nfs@home. We lack candidates of general interest between 200 and 205, so I would like to do the 202 to test this CADO-ggnfs hybrid rather than the 204 first. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#159 |
Jun 2012
52·7·17 Posts |
![]()
Yoyo found a p64. Nice work!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#160 |
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#161 | |
Jun 2012
52·7·17 Posts |
![]() Quote:
If WUs for 2,2230M are now being distributed then I’ll ask Yoyo to remove the job from his queue. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 | |
Nov 2003
746010 Posts |
![]() Quote:
2,2230M will take about the same time to sieve that YoYo takes to do 12K curves. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
Nov 2003
11101001001002 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
5·977 Posts |
![]()
Think there’s less clients connected to NFS, 2,2230M will take longer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
5·977 Posts |
![]()
And 2,2330M is underway at NFS@Home.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cunningham ECM efforts | pinhodecarlos | Cunningham Tables | 7 | 2017-12-21 13:29 |
Cunningham ECM Now Futile? | R.D. Silverman | GMP-ECM | 4 | 2012-04-25 02:45 |
Cunningham Project on YouTube | Batalov | Cunningham Tables | 0 | 2012-02-26 02:58 |
Extended Cunningham or so | rekcahx | Factoring | 6 | 2011-08-19 12:45 |
Introduction: ECM work done on Cunningham Project composites | garo | Cunningham Tables | 2 | 2005-01-20 10:06 |