mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Cunningham Tables

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-02-10, 07:54   #45
bdodson
 
bdodson's Avatar
 
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu

210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frmky View Post
NFS@Home has completed 6,338+. Another routine SNFS following Bruce's ECM find, but a nice split.
Here's a non-routine p62, to finish 6,344+ C190
Code:
44098070546316336069732891124299479167253575131341897248372433
a first hole, #5 on the most wanted list. Nearly the last number from
c190-c209 to finish t55 ("second smallest 100 Cunninghams", now at
either 7t50 or 6t50). I've started on c210-c233. -Bruce
____

ECM is not dead!! Long live ECM! :-) Congratulations on a nice factor! --SB.

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2010-02-10 at 08:06
bdodson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-10, 08:07   #46
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdodson View Post
Here's a non-routine p62, to finish 6,344+ C190
Excellent! Finds like this make up for the long stretchs of factorless ECM runs.
frmky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 17:19   #47
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

3×419 Posts
Default 6,355+

<snip>
that snip means what actually?
Attached Files
File Type: zip 6_355P.zip (9.6 KB, 213 views)
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 17:44   #48
R. Gerbicz
 
R. Gerbicz's Avatar
 
"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary

1,459 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raman View Post
<snip>
that snip means what actually?
c211=p60*p61*p91
double ecm miss?
R. Gerbicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 17:55   #49
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

23518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Gerbicz View Post
c211=p60*p61*p91
double ecm miss?
These days can we consider up the factors within the "low sixties" digit range as ECM misses?
6,355+ is easier by SNFS rather
If one has to find out a p60 factor by using ECM, then it should be a champion within the top 50 ECM factors table?
So, people have to run up with ECM upon all numbers till they find out the factors?
One cannot guarantee before itself that all the factors of the number are within the ECM range only

This is in my perspective. I always favour SNFS rather than ECM.
SNFS does guarantee the factors. That is why I don't actually prefer running up all those ECM curves.

Last fiddled with by Raman on 2010-03-29 at 18:30 Reason: Post Script had been added up just simply
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 19:04   #50
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

11101001001002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raman View Post
These days can we consider up the factors within the "low sixties" digit range as ECM misses?

No way, Jose.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 21:53   #51
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

101001100110002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
No way, Jose.
I'd allow exceptions for irony or for out-right teasing.

Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 22:53   #52
FactorEyes
 
FactorEyes's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
vomit_frame_pointer

23·32·5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
I'd allow exceptions for irony or for out-right teasing.

Paul
I employ a conversion formula:

Tragedy is me pulling a P63 factor on an SNFS-150 job.

Comedy is you pulling a P53 on the same job.

Since the first one happened to me, it's an ECM miss.
FactorEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 23:53   #53
jasonp
Tribal Bullet
 
jasonp's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

33×131 Posts
Default

Bruce explained it all
jasonp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-30, 00:20   #54
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

5×1,879 Posts
Default

Post-factum it is fairly easy to run a single "ecm -v -v 11e7" curve on one's own hardware and estimate if the factor had a 50/50 chance to have been found in 1/10th of the total time spent on NFS factoring. If it had not, sleep well and give an understanding chuckle to those who would invariably call your factor an ECM miss.
Because they will, no matter what...
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-01, 07:24   #55
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

3·419 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Gerbicz View Post
c211=p60*p61*p91
double ecm miss?
6,355+ c211 = p60*p61*p91
In any case, if you assume that this is an ECM miss

Think of 6,365+ c182. Remember that one?
That case 6,365+ c182 split up into as p60*p61*p62
That p60 was an ECM hit! Mr. Paul Zimmermann did the remaining c122 of 6,365+ by using GNFS.
And then why is there such a similarity between 6,355+ with 6,365+

Which state are you people from? Is this information right then?
Mr. Batalov, frmky -> California
Dr. Silverman -> Massachusetts (?)
jasonp -> Maryland
bdodson, Xyzzy -> Pennsylvania, where this mersenneforum server is being hosted up
Prof. Wagstaff -> Indiana
Prime95 (aka George Woltman) -> Florida
philmoore -> Oregon
jbristow -> Washington

Last fiddled with by Raman on 2010-04-01 at 08:09
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5+ table garo Cunningham Tables 100 2021-01-04 22:36
7+ table garo Cunningham Tables 86 2021-01-04 22:35
3+ table garo Cunningham Tables 150 2020-03-23 21:41
5- table garo Cunningham Tables 82 2020-03-15 21:47
6- table garo Cunningham Tables 41 2016-08-04 04:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:35.

Wed Apr 21 08:35:48 UTC 2021 up 13 days, 3:16, 0 users, load averages: 3.45, 3.16, 2.93

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.