mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-11-06, 03:57   #1
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

925810 Posts
Default Another "solution for Fermat's Last Theorem"

Just for exercising the reading/parsing/error-finding skills, have a look at the cross-posted message (that was politely ignored by everyone) in primenumbers yahoo group.

I will only address the last statement therein (page 12):
Quote:
Hence the reason I want to conclude the document with a proposition that for any positive integers xi, y
and n the following statements is true
y^n = x1^n + x2^n + x3^n … + xi^n
if and only if i >= n.
It is curious that this is easily refuted by demonstration (with i=4 < n=5):
144^5 = 133^5+110^5+84^5+27^5 (due to found in the abstract of T.Womack's thesis; circa 1997).
Wiki tells us that this is the reinvented Euler's conjecture, and the disproof is due to L. J. Lander and T. R. Parkin (1966)

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2013-11-06 at 04:42
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-06, 05:55   #2
TheMawn
 
TheMawn's Avatar
 
May 2013
East. Always East.

11×157 Posts
Default

It's almost unfortunate that this was disproved. It would have been a very interesting theorem.

I saw this video about it the other day. I really quite like Numberphile. Interesting stuff. It's just some information that most people here probably already know, but dumbed down a bit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiNcEguuFSA
TheMawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-06, 06:05   #3
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

2×3×1,543 Posts
Default

The first line of this video is a grook by Piet Hein!
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-06, 19:01   #4
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

164448 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
Just for exercising the reading/parsing/error-finding skills, have a look at the cross-posted message (that was politely ignored by everyone) in primenumbers yahoo group.

I will only address the last statement therein (page 12):
It is curious that this is easily refuted by demonstration (with i=4 < n=5):
144^5 = 133^5+110^5+84^5+27^5 (due to found in the abstract of T.Womack's thesis; circa 1997).
Wiki tells us that this is the reinvented Euler's conjecture, and the disproof is due to L. J. Lander and T. R. Parkin (1966)
And of course Noam Elkies constructed infinitely many counter-examples
for n = 4.

See also:

http://euler.free.fr/
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 5 2016-10-22 01:55
"Honey, I think our son's autistic." "Okay, I'll buy him some crayons." jasong jasong 10 2015-12-14 06:38
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" wildrabbitt Miscellaneous Math 11 2015-03-06 08:17
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? nitai1999 Software 7 2004-08-26 18:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:52.

Mon Jan 18 00:52:45 UTC 2021 up 45 days, 21:04, 0 users, load averages: 2.04, 1.92, 1.88

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.