20131106, 03:57  #1  
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
9258_{10} Posts 
Another "solution for Fermat's Last Theorem"
Just for exercising the reading/parsing/errorfinding skills, have a look at the crossposted message (that was politely ignored by everyone) in primenumbers yahoo group.
I will only address the last statement therein (page 12): Quote:
144^5 = 133^5+110^5+84^5+27^5 ( Wiki tells us that this is the reinvented Euler's conjecture, and the disproof is due to L. J. Lander and T. R. Parkin (1966) Last fiddled with by Batalov on 20131106 at 04:42 

20131106, 05:55  #2 
May 2013
East. Always East.
11×157 Posts 
It's almost unfortunate that this was disproved. It would have been a very interesting theorem.
I saw this video about it the other day. I really quite like Numberphile. Interesting stuff. It's just some information that most people here probably already know, but dumbed down a bit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiNcEguuFSA 
20131106, 06:05  #3 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×3×1,543 Posts 
The first line of this video is a grook by Piet Hein!

20131106, 19:01  #4  
Nov 2003
16444_{8} Posts 
Quote:
for n = 4. See also: http://euler.free.fr/ 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion"  MooMoo2  Other Chess Games  5  20161022 01:55 
"Honey, I think our son's autistic." "Okay, I'll buy him some crayons."  jasong  jasong  10  20151214 06:38 
AouessareEl HaddouchiEssaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!"  wildrabbitt  Miscellaneous Math  11  20150306 08:17 
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier?  nitai1999  Software  7  20040826 18:12 