20120725, 07:29  #1 
Noodles
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India
2351_{8} Posts 
Operation DunningKrugerKrieg
If whether it is really being practically possible, indeed
Please pardon my own interruption. But as a collective team work & effort, will we be indeed really be able to tackle away with RSA1024 in its place? It sounds rather like a drastic jump to me,is to being for towards away quite directly from 203 digits within Mersenne Forum, 232 digits from within EPFL et al. 309 decimal digits. Remember this thing first place Furthermore, what is being the fun in tackling away something for which we already know the factors to be of both roughly equal in size? I am not questioning for developments & improvements in GNFS polynomial selection tool, not some need to eliminate away the small possible prime factors by using the Elliptic Curve Method, etc. If we go after some mathematical number, then we have got atleast some mystery already being hidden behind, to know size of prime factors being hidden behind them, beneath, etc. 2,1277 being very much easier than RSA1024; SNFS 385 ≈ GNFS 269 < GNFS 309 (2,1237) SNFS 373 ?? not much of fun since one prime factor p70 is being revealed thereby 2,1123+ c338 no nonprimitive prime factors being known away at all for this thing, either 2,1117 c337 2,2042 L/M SNFS 308 13,269 c299 L1277 / L1279 c267 / c268 If RSA1024 seems to be too drastic a jump, you still need GNFS candidates, numbers alone, as yet, also a little big enough, as well, then, , then, there exist definitely numbers like such as including with RSA896 GNFS 270, not being a too drastic a jump, such as, like the RSA1024, GNFS 309 at all EM48 GNFS 256 10,383+ c230, definitely GNFS, being available with lowest possible GNFS/SNFS ratio, among other Cunninghams, is somewhat being equivalent to RSA768 from within size & difficulty in terms hardly only biggest GNFS being available with actually to be being enough, is although, , maybe next possible step for Mersenne Forum stage after B200 c203, etc. not a sudden drastic jerk as well, including RSA1024 GNFS 309 at all But still, RSA896 is being a very much jump too also, as well, as yet at all as since there exist no intermediate RSA832, RSA960 at all, during first place But potentially 10,383+ c230 maybe become a sudden ECM hit as well, after so many small prime factors have been eliminated away for this thing by making usage for Elliptical curve method, as well? For this thing, as well. Similar to things for 2,991± stuffs! Or otherwise somebody maybe potentially try away in order to lead away with a somewhat practically potentially possible challenging project probably  but perhaps try to finish away with Cunningham base 2 tables for 1000 bits For this thing, as well, there exist alone 8 such items existing from within the + /  side, as well, 2,929 2,947 2,991 2,947+ 2,961+ 2,983+ 2,989+ 2,991+ But 11 such things, as such, stuffs being pending away from within 2 LM side tables to be being potentially enough They are being listed away as follows 2,1846L 2,1874L 2,1894M 2,1898L 2,1898M 2,1906M 2,1934M 2,1942M 2,1954M 2,1978L 2,1982M Last fiddled with by Raman on 20120725 at 08:29 
20120725, 13:14  #2 
Noodles
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India
3×419 Posts 
Potentially, very much easier targets before, prior to RSA1024 maybe
To complete this thing have been posted, to be mentioned above, as such maybe
To be good enough in order to having a crack for Potentially speaking away, these are being greatly very much easier preliminary targets before, prior to RSA1024 maybe 2,1277 SNFS 385 (David Stevens !?) 2,1237 SNFS 373 2,1193 SNFS 360 I am being very much aware for severe ECM resistance for this thingy, for at once 2,1123± SNFS 338 (myself !!) 2,1117 SNFS 337 7,379± SNFS 320 no nonprimitive parts being known away at all for this thing, either 2,2042 L/M SNFS 308 13,269 SNFS 300 2,991 SNFS 299 2,947 SNFS 286 2,929 SNFS 280 is being totally neglected by Mr. Tom Womack, to be put altogether ?? L1279 SNFS 268 L1277 SNFS 267 RSA1024 GNFS 309 (Mr. Paul Leyland ?!) RSA896 GNFS 270 EM48 GNFS 256 (Mr. Bill Winslow ??) 10,383+ GNFS 230 
20120725, 14:44  #3 
Sep 2004
B0E_{16} Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Operation: Billion Digits  clowns789  Operation Billion Digits  574  20170912 01:34 
davar55's cosmoautohagiography: Worth its weight in DunningKruggerands  cheesehead  Miscellaneous Math  298  20150427 19:13 
DunningKrugerrands for Jesus  jasong  Soap Box  70  20131222 04:45 
Operation Megabit Twin  Oddball  Twin Prime Search  370  20130103 21:26 
The modulo operation, how is it computed?  eepiccolo  Math  7  20030108 03:07 