![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
![]()
title says it all
moderately small range (1663 exponents) to run on older machine estimated runtime: 35 days |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
![]()
the computer is pleasantly surprising me with its times - looking like 25 days instead of 35
![]() as such, since no one else claimed it I'll add on 33.10M-33.15M to this range, which should be 18-20 days worth of work (20-23 total) wish i could go back to ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
1010001102 Posts |
![]()
range completed and results sent to George along with some 69M updates
2921 exponents tested 60 factors found |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
70.0-71.0M to 63 bits | Boulder | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 3 | 2007-11-05 06:26 |
48.0M - 48.1M to 63 bits | Aeternus | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 1 | 2007-04-16 14:35 |
64 bits versus 32 bits Windows | S485122 | Software | 2 | 2006-10-31 19:14 |
35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits | Khemikal796 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 12 | 2005-12-01 21:35 |
33.0M - 33.21928M to 2^61 | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 1 | 2005-03-01 01:40 |