20210609, 14:03  #1882 
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
210_{16} Posts 

20210609, 14:08  #1883  
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
1000010000_{2} Posts 
Quote:
2004109083829816426995592902 = 2 * 3 * 281 * 29917 * 47269 * 8106041 * 103695649, so the biggest factor is 103695649, the exponent, which is bigger than B2=20264000. Is it possible it's not accounting for the special form of Mersenne factors, which allows ignoring P as a factor of Q1 (Q is the factor found) and only using the general rules for factors found by the P1 method? 

20210609, 14:20  #1884 
Jun 2003
3×1,669 Posts 

20210610, 09:11  #1885 
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
528_{10} Posts 
M1001159 has a 120.912bit (37digit) factor: 2500439903769890259112379635985290039 (P1,B1=10000000,B2=1110000000)
Is it Christmas already? This one should come in at about 365th place. 
20210610, 10:30  #1886 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
2^{2}·647 Posts 
No, no, no, I have no budget for christmass right now. So it is NOT christmass. At least for another 6 month.
Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 20210610 at 10:30 
20210610, 13:51  #1887  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·61·79 Posts 
Quote:


20210612, 19:01  #1888 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
2^{2}·647 Posts 
M23554211 has a 114.027bit (35digit) factor: 21164767805799094411604254592575543 (P1,B1=1200000,B2=79200000)
I also have a near Christmass time Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20210613 at 04:23 Reason: fixin' wrong M[] tag 
20210613, 04:28  #1889 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
13×733 Posts 
We found both an 98.x and 101.x bits factors in 35.1M range,
They are not sync'd on James' site yet, but they are indeed very smooth! Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20210613 at 10:02 
20210613, 09:33  #1890 
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2^{4}×3×11 Posts 
Your 98.x factor directs to 83.x factor and 101.x factor directs to 98.x factor.

20210613, 10:06  #1891 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
10010100111001_{2} Posts 
Fixed, thank you very much! (I didn't edit the quote in your post, only my post). I got lost in so many factors and links. But in this case, the 101 is not anymore "smooth". My mistake. As they were not yet on mersenne.ca at the time, I wrongly remembered their size (which is displayed when reporting), and I assumed the 101 was the smooth one (the "smoothness" is deduced from the amount of credit given, you don't need to do any calculation or to see the k value to know your factor is very smooth, hehe).
Therefore, to repair the damage, take this new 115 bits guy here... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20210613 at 10:11 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
A new factor of F11?!  siegert81  FermatSearch  2  20180124 04:35 
A fond farewell  rogue  Lounge  10  20081121 05:25 
who can factor 10^100+27?  aaa120  Factoring  17  20081113 19:23 
New factor  fivemack  ElevenSmooth  4  20080507 19:28 
Shortest time to complete a 2^67 trial factor (no factor)  dsouza123  Software  12  20030821 18:38 