20081029, 15:04  #892 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
6474_{10} Posts 

20081029, 15:15  #893  
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
4267_{10} Posts 
http://v5www.mersenne.org/legal/#awards
Quote:
Last fiddled with by MiniGeek on 20081029 at 15:16 

20081029, 17:42  #894  
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts 
Quote:
I was interested in the admission that it will take GIMPS "1215 years" to reach 100M digits at the current rate of participation. 

20081031, 19:21  #895 
Jun 2003
Ottawa, Canada
7·167 Posts 
It looks like we are #29 on Time Magazine's 50 Best Inventions of 2008:
http://www.time.com/time/specials/pa...854157,00.html I wonder if it was a fluke they picked 29 since it is also prime, or if it just worked out that way? Last fiddled with by Jeff Gilchrist on 20081031 at 19:30 
20081031, 23:53  #896  
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts 
Quote:


20081101, 02:09  #897 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2^{2}·7·307 Posts 

20081101, 02:56  #898 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
6DE_{16} Posts 
Well, I haven't heard about any other team members. I got the impression Edson Smith was solely responsible for installing Prime95, unless you want to count administrative approval as being part of the team.

20081109, 19:31  #899 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2×3×293 Posts 
The headline "45th Mersenne Prime Earns #29 on Time's Top 50 Best Inventions of 2008" has been posted on www.mersenne.org (which by the way has merged with v5).

20081110, 08:27  #900 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
3336_{8} Posts 

20081110, 18:30  #901 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
2·5·157 Posts 
But even if they are a team, their maths stinks (or is it the maths of the writer of the article ?) : "It's a number that is so long that if you typed it out at 10 characters per inch, it would stretch 20 to 30 miles long, depending on what font you were using." No if typed out at 10 c / inch it will be 52 miles whatever the font (because they defined the font as using an inch for 10 characters. Then they repeat the typesetting fault seen in other articles : "2p1" instead of "2^{p}1" or "2^p1" or even "2**p1". Two other pearls in the article : "In fact, tens of thousands have participated in the search by downloading a free program from GIMPS, which keeps track of which numbers are tested and eliminated, and sends out untested candidate numbers to the GIMPS community for factoring. The process of factoring one number can take a computer as long as two months, Smith explained. But joining forces via the Internet makes the search possible." and"GIMPS tested the number by factoring it using a different algorithm on various kinds of computers. "We had to sweat it out for two weeks until they verified it," Smith said.", they factored it initially and during the verification run ?
Jacob Last fiddled with by S485122 on 20081110 at 18:31 
20081110, 19:29  #902 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2^{2}×7×307 Posts 
The article was better than average, though. It turns out the number was found on the same type of machine that I am typing on.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED!  dabaichi  News  561  20130329 16:55 
Holy Speedup, Batman!  R.D. Silverman  NFSNET Discussion  4  20081002 01:28 
Holy Beaverpotamus, Batman!  ewmayer  Science & Technology  4  20080314 19:19 
holy tethered cow! new Mersenne prime? (M43related)  ixfd64  News  265  20060104 09:47 
Holy <censored>! Wow!!!!!!!!!  R.D. Silverman  Factoring  11  20050407 17:00 