![]() |
![]() |
#914 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2E2216 Posts |
![]()
367^51, 53, 55, 59, & 61 terminate
I'm still working on 367^57. It's a tough one for such a small starting size. No other work on this base. I'm just now starting on base 373. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#915 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
22×1,307 Posts |
![]()
I'll try to catch this up in the morning. You did notice I completed the three I mentioned a couple posts ago?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#916 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·5·1,181 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#917 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2×5×1,181 Posts |
![]()
23^123 terminates
Base 23 is complete!! ![]() It's great to have a base finished that was expanded to 125 exponents a few months ago. This was a most unexpected development. For a long time, it looked like back-to-back hard C136s. You split the first one so I was going to go ahead and split this one but I got lucky. ECM came through at the last minute with a P42 that ended up in a 3-way split. 3 indexes later it dropped the factor 3 and then it dropped 15 digits over the next 2 indexes and that's all it took. Easy-peasy after that. Alas, I'm not off the hook so easily. 307^63 also came up with a C136 on the index after you split the C140. This one held tight through full ECM. At 149/136/3, its size is small enough that I'll continue with it hoping not to get a C>=140. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#918 |
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
20718 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#919 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·5·1,181 Posts |
![]()
373^51, 53, 57, 59, & 61 terminate
I'm still working on 373^55 as well as 367^57 from yesterday. No more work on exponents 63 or 65 for either of the new bases. From the splits, I'm still working on 307^63 and 1184^54. Almost everything coming up with tough cofactors here but not so tough that I won't keep going with them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#920 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·5·1,181 Posts |
![]()
373^55 terminates
I'm done with base 373. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#921 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
22×1,307 Posts |
![]()
Let's play with some ^63s and a couple ^65s:
Code:
373^63: 160/141 367^63: 159/145 347^63: 151/148 359^63: 156/154 373^65: 161/159 367^65: 163/161 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#922 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·5·1,181 Posts |
![]()
367^57 terminates
Releasing 1184^54 at 146/143/3/full. Worked and released 373^63 at 160/152/3/t40. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-09 at 07:29 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#923 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·5·1,181 Posts |
![]()
359^63 terminates
Base 359 is complete! I finally got one of these exponent 63 thingies to cooperate. They've been a pain. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#924 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·5·1,181 Posts |
![]()
There's a lot going on so here's a status:
From your recent ^63 & ^65 splits: 373^63: 160/152/3/t40 released; reported this morning 367^63: 159/136/3/full released 347^63: 149/147/109/t40 still running full ECM and has passed t40; will release if it doesn't split. 359^63: terminated per last post (last two have not split yet) From your previous splits: 307^63: 141/129/3/full still working on a very long-running one; will take it to termination. From the index 1 effort: 1155^51: 142/140/11/full still working; will take it to termination. New bases 888 and 1264460; just getting started: Base 888: ^50 & ^52 will need some work but I will work towards termination on them. Base 1264460: ^26 is at 159/128/3/full so I'll split that but I don't anticipate continuing much more. ^28 & ^30 have had their typical ECM run on them. Nothing there. I'm also initializing opposite-parity sequences on both bases. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unexpected termination of PM-1 | Miszka | Software | 22 | 2021-11-19 21:36 |
Easier pi(x) approximation | mathPuzzles | Math | 8 | 2017-05-04 10:58 |
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if... | xtreme2k | Math | 34 | 2013-09-09 23:54 |
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime? | EdH | Aliquot Sequences | 6 | 2010-04-06 00:12 |
A new termination below 100k | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 0 | 2010-03-11 18:24 |