Reservations - Page 4

Prime95 · 2012-09-26, 13:15

FermatFactor=56,200e12,1e15
FermatFactor=57,280e12,1e15
FermatFactor=58,280e12,1e15
FermatFactor=59,280e12,1e15

frmky · 2012-09-27, 17:37

FermatFactor=60,2e14,1e15

Jatheski · 2012-09-28, 19:32

FermatFactor=61,200e12,1e15
FermatFactor=62,200e12,1e15

frmky · 2012-09-29, 00:27

FermatFactor=63,2e14,1e15

lalera · 2012-09-29, 01:48

FermatFactor=94,200e12,1000e12
FermatFactor=95,200e12,1000e12

aketilander · 2012-09-29, 19:35

MMFactor=127,4300e12,4600e12

lalera · 2012-09-29, 20:58

MMFactor=31,18014398509481982,20e15

ATH · 2012-09-30, 06:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

FermatFactor=140,12e12,1e14
FermatFactor=141,12e12,1e14
...
FermatFactor=149,12e12,1e14

Did you fiddle with mmff to extend range? If not it only goes to 188 bit factors which is k=5.5e11 for n=149, k=1.1e12 for n=148..... k=7e13 for n=142.

Batalov · 2012-09-30, 07:00

I noticed that later. (It depends on the k value; for lower k ranges, it would have run). I am running the early 140s now.

I will probably fiddle, later. (Now that my hands are untied from PE 396, heh, heh, nice one, btw..!) The same limit kicks in for the mmff-gfn and I did want to extend the upper limit for both. The main driver of the probability of success is simply ~ 1/k !* (~ 1/k * 1/(ln k + N ln 2), but the last part is so-o-o-o flat), so getting to as low k as possible is desirable. ;-)

*! is not the factorial sign, surely

frmky · 2012-09-30, 20:01

FermatFactor=71,3e14,1e15

c10ck3r · 2012-10-01, 01:32

FermatFactor=100,4e12,145

2012-09-29, 19:35	#39
aketilander "Åke Tilander" Apr 2011 Sandviken, Sweden 2·283 Posts	MM127 MMFactor=127,4300e12,4600e12

2012-09-30, 07:00	#42
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3·7·479 Posts	I noticed that later. (It depends on the k value; for lower k ranges, it would have run). I am running the early 140s now. I will probably fiddle, later. (Now that my hands are untied from PE 396, heh, heh, nice one, btw..!) The same limit kicks in for the mmff-gfn and I did want to extend the upper limit for both. The main driver of the probability of success is simply ~ 1/k !* (~ 1/k * 1/(ln k + N ln 2), but the last part is so-o-o-o flat), so getting to as low k as possible is desirable. ;-) ! is not the factorial sign, surely Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2012-09-30 at 07:02 Reason: 1/k! would have been silly*

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Reservations	kar_bon	Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1)	129	2016-09-05 09:23
Where are my reservations	fivemack	PrimeNet	3	2016-02-08 17:58
Reservations?	R.D. Silverman	NFS@Home	15	2015-11-29 23:18
Reservations	R.D. Silverman	Cunningham Tables	15	2011-03-04 21:01
4-5M Reservations	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	15	2008-06-08 03:29

2012-09-26, 13:15	#34
Prime95 P90 years forever! Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 5×23×71 Posts	FermatFactor=56,200e12,1e15 FermatFactor=57,280e12,1e15 FermatFactor=58,280e12,1e15 FermatFactor=59,280e12,1e15

2012-09-27, 17:37	#35
frmky Jul 2003 So Cal 19·137 Posts	FermatFactor=60,2e14,1e15

2012-09-28, 19:32	#36
Jatheski Apr 2012 993438: i1090 2×73 Posts	FermatFactor=61,200e12,1e15 FermatFactor=62,200e12,1e15

2012-09-29, 00:27	#37
frmky Jul 2003 So Cal 2603₁₀ Posts	FermatFactor=63,2e14,1e15

2012-09-29, 01:48	#38
lalera Jul 2003 623₁₀ Posts	FermatFactor=94,200e12,1000e12 FermatFactor=95,200e12,1000e12

2012-09-29, 20:58	#40
lalera Jul 2003 26F₁₆ Posts	MMFactor=31,18014398509481982,20e15

2012-09-30, 20:01	#43
frmky Jul 2003 So Cal 19×137 Posts	FermatFactor=71,3e14,1e15

2012-10-01, 01:32	#44
c10ck3r Aug 2010 Kansas 547 Posts	FermatFactor=100,4e12,145