20201017, 23:52  #12 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
2×991 Posts 

20201018, 03:08  #13 
Mar 2019
11·13 Posts 

20201018, 03:22  #14 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
2·991 Posts 
I'm sure it does. I never hid the fact that I am no mathematician.
Thank you for the correction. I will try to remember the notation. Last fiddled with by a1call on 20201018 at 03:23 
20201018, 09:23  #15  
"Viliam FurÃk"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
5·67 Posts 
Quote:
If the cofactor is tested composite by PRP test, the cofactor is certainly composite. If you refer to this page, then yes, it may be kind of confusing to see PRP cofactor written there, but that's really only a title. If it would be PRP, for real, it would have had written "PRP_PRP_PRP_PRP_" in place of residue. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Peter Montgomery's Thesis  mickfrancis  Computer Science & Computational Number Theory  3  20150625 14:32 
Peter Montgomery (IMPORTANT)  R.D. Silverman  Factoring  8  20140607 18:43 
Range for k>300 that Peter Benson has searched  gd_barnes  No Prime Left Behind  42  20090120 17:01 