![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22×2,549 Posts |
![]()
Placeholder for xy+yx prime search reservations.
Contact XYYXF to reserve a range. Multisieve is one of the sieve programs capable of sieving this form. Last fiddled with by XYYXF on 2015-02-02 at 15:03 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jun 2012
76278 Posts |
![]()
Yafu can sieve this form too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Ben"
Feb 2007
22×941 Posts |
![]()
It can?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
101000001100002 Posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() Sorry, I don't laugh at any of you. It is just about the situation, I expected all in the world but didn't expect Ben's reply to this, in this way! [edit: if some guest read this, maybe they don't know, Ben is yafu's author]. I can't stop laughing. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2014-05-13 at 14:14 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jun 2012
76278 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Ben"
Feb 2007
22×941 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22·2,549 Posts |
![]()
Well, of course, sieving can be done with almost any program (including your own). But the question is how fast can it sieve. Multisieve is good.
A worked example: 1. Get Multisieve and PFGW 2. Start, select x^y+-y^x mode, select "+", set up some names for outputs, e.g. "xyyx200.out" and "xyyx200.log"; set up limits above previously searched: e.g. x from 200 to 200, y from 20001 to 30000 3. Sieve, after a while, stop (e.g. at 10-20s per candidate) 4. Run pfgw on the "xyyx200.out" file (with -f0 -l) 5. ... 6. PROFIT! e.g. 200^20373+20373^200 is a (new) PRP 7. Submit to PRP top |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus
24·52 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
237248 Posts |
![]()
Multisieve reversed that order (because xy > yx, for 3<=x<y, and because it sieves for xy +/- yx, so it would be convenient to have a positive number). It was an example of setting up Multisieve. Multisieve will require x<y.
Let's start the fun? I will run the [20001-40000, 11-200] range. Found six new PRPs so far, while warming up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus
24·52 Posts |
![]()
OK, http://xyyxf.at.tut.by/primes.html#ranges is updated. But I still hope someone will decrease the number of steps y>10, y>200, y>1000, y>2000 :-)
E.g. it's possible to take [15001-20000, 1001-2000]. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
161008 Posts |
![]()
I haven't touched MultiSieve in years. It's good to know that some people still have use for it. After looking at the code (talk about a blast from the past), I think it would be easy to convert this sieve to OpenCL since it doesn't use a discrete log. An OpenCL version might 100x faster.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leyland Primes | storm5510 | storm5510 | 6 | 2022-07-04 14:32 |
Leyland Primes: ECPP proofs | Batalov | XYYXF Project | 57 | 2022-06-30 17:24 |
Patterns in primes that are primitive roots / Gaps in full-reptend primes | mart_r | Prime Gap Searches | 14 | 2020-06-30 12:42 |
On Leyland Primes | davar55 | Puzzles | 9 | 2016-03-15 20:55 |
possible primes (real primes & poss.prime products) | troels munkner | Miscellaneous Math | 4 | 2006-06-02 08:35 |