20230310, 15:40  #617 
Apr 2020
3×11×31 Posts 
They must have increased the number of IPs they're (ab)using.
If the IPs are all in the same range, perhaps a limit on IDs created per appropriatelysized range per hour is the way to go. 
20230312, 23:46  #618  
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2FA4_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Perhaps a solution would be to require that everyone register their ID and Email with the site. That would challenge the spammer a little more; at least make him work a little harder when using multiple IPs. You'd lose the anonymity that we have now. I would not be opposed to that. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20230312 at 23:48 

20230313, 13:55  #619 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
980_{10} Posts 
Unless the new limits have been eased (which it doesn't sound like they have), I think the return of the spam puts to rest any idea that this spammer is a misguided, rather than malicious, individual, as some people here had posited/hoped. Markus should seriously consider contacting the police and/or a security consultant as the next step.

20230313, 18:08  #620  
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
26772_{8} Posts 
Quote:


20230313, 18:10  #621 
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
2·5·11·107 Posts 

20230314, 00:27  #622 
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
5×7×79 Posts 
factordb loses me. I picked a number, a play on my dad's birthday, which is 8 digits and searched. It was there. On the farleft side was "FF" meaning fully factored. Behind the number I searched for were several small numbers. How can something be fully factored if the largest factor is three digits long?

20230314, 02:07  #623 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×5×7×83 Posts 

20230314, 15:15  #624  
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
5·7·79 Posts 
Quote:
The number I was goofing with is 18061923. ddmmyyyy. I expected a composite of this size to have a larger factor. Then again, maybe not. None of this is important. Just a curiosity. 

20230314, 18:45  #625 
Aug 2020
79*6581e4;3*2539e3
2DA_{16} Posts 
The number of prime factors of a number n is on the order of log(log(n)). An 8 digit number can be tentatively expected to have 3 prime factors. So, a 3 digit prime as the largest factor is not that strange.
https://factordb.com/index.php?query...%2Bn&use=n&n=0 Last fiddled with by bur on 20230314 at 18:46 
20230530, 22:03  #626 
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
769 Posts 
Has this always been like this?
Has anyone else noticed the typo under More Information for special form numbers? I just now noticed it:
http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00004435617556 "Autogenerated SNFSPolynominal available!" (should be "Polynomial") How long has it been this way without us noticing? Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 20230530 at 22:07 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
A suggestion for factordb.  enzocreti  FactorDB  24  20221117 07:20 
Extending Factordb  carpetpool  FactorDB  6  20170123 11:04 
FactorDB PRP's  smh  FactorDB  231  20150728 02:30 
bugged sequence in factordb  firejuggler  Aliquot Sequences  2  20100615 14:03 
FactorDB question  Raman  Factoring  15  20100128 10:24 