mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > GPU to 72

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-01-25, 02:20   #1
Chuck
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
May 2011
Orange Park, FL

16028 Posts
Default Should I TF 70—>73 or 72—>73?

Which is better? I thought it might be better to work the "last mile" 72—>73 since that helps get the exponents out of GPU to 72 and back to the PrimeNet pool.

But is time better spent starting from 70 (with StopAfterFactor=2 to bail out as soon as possible after finding a factor) since the chance of finding a factor is higher at the lower TF level, although clearing fewer exponents out in the same amount of time?

Tell me what to do...
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-25, 03:11   #2
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

24·613 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
Which is better? I thought it might be better to work the "last mile" 72—>73 since that helps get the exponents out of GPU to 72 and back to the PrimeNet pool.

But is time better spent starting from 70 (with StopAfterFactor=2 to bail out as soon as possible after finding a factor) since the chance of finding a factor is higher at the lower TF level, although clearing fewer exponents out in the same amount of time?

Tell me what to do...
Please DO NOT skip bitlevels.
First, is not optimum, you have more chances to find factors at lower bitlevels, for the unit of the time spent doing TF.
Second, is not "orthodox", skipped levels tend to be forgotten and never done.
Third, you do it for free, as you will not be able to report it, PrimeNet does not accept "non-contiguous" bit ranges. So, you waste the time, no credit for you.

If the exponent is TF to 70 on PrimeNet's DB, then please do 70 up.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-25, 03:41   #3
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·5,023 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
Which is better? I thought it might be better to work the "last mile" 72—>73 since that helps get the exponents out of GPU to 72 and back to the PrimeNet pool.
It is best for GIMPS to take whatever is lowest (by Candidate) to what is deemed to the optimal bit level. Then it can be released back to GIMPS for assignment for LLing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
But is time better spent starting from 70 (with StopAfterFactor=2 to bail out as soon as possible after finding a factor) since the chance of finding a factor is higher at the lower TF level, although clearing fewer exponents out in the same amount of time?
Entirely up to you. Choosing "Lowest TF Level", and taking it up to the release level is a reasonable strategy. The current "What Makes Sense" is taking the lowest available candidate up to the release level.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
Tell me what to do...
Choose to do what you enjoy most.

At the end of the day all the current candidates need to go up to (at least) 73. Some get fixated on finding factors, and/or the "GHz Days Saved" metric so only go one level. That just means that someone else has to step in and do the rest of the work.
chalsall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-25, 03:44   #4
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·5,023 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Please DO NOT skip bitlevels.
Chuck understands this.

Just in case you don't remember, he's the reason the "Highest TF Level" is an option. He volunteered about a year ago to do the less-coveted "last level".
chalsall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-25, 05:34   #5
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

24×613 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
He volunteered about a year ago to do the less-coveted "last level".


Sorry!
Indeed I did not know/remember that.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-25, 13:17   #6
Chuck
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
May 2011
Orange Park, FL

2·449 Posts
Default

OK. I see the logic of working on the lowest exponents. I'll switch back to "What makes sense" option.
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 13:14.


Thu Dec 2 13:14:07 UTC 2021 up 132 days, 7:43, 0 users, load averages: 1.56, 1.71, 1.49

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.