20090519, 13:08  #727  
Oct 2006
vomit_frame_pointer
2^{3}×3^{2}×5 Posts 
Quote:
Code:
11,3,163+ (P62.P108): 30556091035598962077698413132112923836577405502889334458978433 130551495116541763225357524118631332769933048513963325900652166033897790522339536207900945944303230194493409 11,7,167+ (P58.P84): 1272005442321579689524365952305632226814228274000116089827 312015433733802621889618775001201778298458362790254918197751109933640094316694263793 

20090520, 17:37  #728 
Oct 2006
vomit_frame_pointer
360_{10} Posts 
49 cosmopolitan factors remaining
10^178+3^178 done. C137 = P60.P78:
Code:
642148002219988747424531941683071921531867826590194512541277 153517327861601300083057135437187570295275388635805491755426490673321233322221 
20090606, 00:57  #729 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
43×59 Posts 
10,7,193 done
Code:
r1=7893467543205277403724250794278746426391603828821170993333449 (pp61) r2=39159559142036115302705244870655361826198555900479867328910173188115893391258203140703563684381158586800097377311322283 (pp119) 
20090606, 06:12  #730 
Oct 2004
Austria
2×17×73 Posts 
I agree  wanting a few easy c9x's for benchmarking the new msieve 1.42 beta
Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 20090606 at 06:13 Reason: repaired tags 
20090606, 17:21  #731 
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
3×3,529 Posts 

20090606, 17:23  #732 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
2·3·101 Posts 
Where is the complete list of to be done numbers?
Should I run some ECM curves on it? yoyo 
20090606, 17:35  #733  
Sep 2005
Berlin
2×3×11 Posts 
Quote:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uc...mack/homcun.pl These numbers have been extensively ecm'ed. If you run some curves, then I would recommend a high B1 value. I have run thousands of curves with B1=43e6, without success. Last fiddled with by Yamato on 20090606 at 17:46 

20090606, 18:53  #734  
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×2,909 Posts 
Quote:
c93=339772802883176116304543854244958639157459375892786024089728468713335683937078357811016693439 are these helpful? if you factor them could you add them into the factorization database please and let me know Last fiddled with by henryzz on 20090606 at 18:53 

20090607, 09:44  #735  
Oct 2004
Austria
2×17×73 Posts 
Quote:
GNFS with msieve 1.42 beta poly selection, GGNFS sieving and msieve postprocessing took 1:21:20 hours on a core 2 duo @ 2.0 GHz (every step running only onethreaded). For comparison: yafu took 1:50:00 hours for this number. 

20090607, 09:59  #736 
Nov 2008
2·3^{3}·43 Posts 
If you want a number with n bits (remember it's bits!) for benchmarking, just run
Code:
yafu rsa(n) Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 20090607 at 10:00 
20090607, 12:35  #737  
Oct 2004
Austria
4662_{8} Posts 
Quote:
poly search (msieve 1.42 beta): 13:24 minutes sieving + postprocessing (FactMsieve.pl): 1.95 hours (with some bad luck  filtering wanted a fistful (~20k) more relations in the first place, and then  according to the factmsieveparameters  it sieved another 60kQ range (getting 614k additional relations) and ended up quite oversieved.) 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
New phi for homogeneous Cunningham numbers  wpolly  Factoring  26  20160729 04:34 
Mathematics of Cunningham Numbers (3rd ed., 2002, A.M.S.)  Xyzzy  Cunningham Tables  42  20140402 18:31 
Don't know how to work on Cunningham numbers.  jasong  GMPECM  6  20060630 08:51 
Doing Cunningham numbers but messed up.  jasong  Factoring  1  20060403 17:18 
Need help factoring Cunningham numbers  jasong  Factoring  27  20060321 02:47 