20201016, 04:53  #1 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
10710_{8} Posts 
Relative performance of GPUs for P1
I realize P1 as a separate task is discontinued ... however ...
I am still running the version that allows it: Does it seems reasonable that for the various Colab GPUs available I am seeing relative Stage1 iteration times of (based on my specific B1 but still relative): P4: 3,600 T4: 2,630 K80: 1,800 P100: 470 (yes 4 to 8 times faster) 
20201016, 12:15  #2  
"Marv"
May 2009
near the TannhÃ¤user Gate
607 Posts 
Quote:
Neither the P4 nor the T4 have many FP64 cores available. These cores are essential for performance doing Stage1. Their specs are fairly close but since the T4 is newer with faster memory & a few other things, it should be faster than the P4. Even tho the K80 is quite old, it still has decent FP64 performance AND it has 2 GPUs. The P100 has lots of FP64 cores and they will yield the best performance. AFAIK the P4 and T4 are touted as being designed explicitly for training AIs since they do not require high percision computations. Last fiddled with by tServo on 20201016 at 12:16 

20201016, 13:46  #3 
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×3×1,579 Posts 

20201016, 14:12  #4  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
3^{2}×5×109 Posts 
Quote:


20201016, 18:19  #5 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2^{3}×569 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Gaps in kalmost primes relative to 2^k, a question  mart_r  Prime Gap Searches  3  20200402 19:36 
was this formula known relative to primality and factorization that you know?  Alberico Lepore  Alberico Lepore  7  20190103 23:42 
Number of relative primes for P1  petrw1  Factoring  4  20181107 20:20 
P1 factoring, relative primes  timbit  Information & Answers  0  20090313 18:45 
relative speed of processors  Primeinator  Hardware  10  20050227 18:03 