20211230, 19:00  #5226 
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2^{2}×2,617 Posts 

20211231, 00:12  #5227  
"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China
251 Posts 
Quote:
In other ranges that have already less than 2000 unfactored, you may use smaller bounds. 

20211231, 05:35  #5228  
Mar 2019
USA
125_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I let Prime95 (V30.7 build 9) choose the bounds, I don't touch them. The only thing I change is tests_saved = 1, since the primality test will be a PRP with GEC and proof generation. 

20211231, 12:41  #5229  
"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China
251 Posts 
Quote:
If you use all these small bounds for 108.3M, there will be 2030 unfactored exponents at least, thus P1 have to be rerun with larger bounds for the 2k project, which means that you previous run worth virtually nothing. You may change a range (110.3M and 111.2M seems to be very good choices with less than 1900 unfactored). Last fiddled with by Zhangrc on 20211231 at 12:46 

20211231, 15:15  #5230 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
12075_{8} Posts 
For the sake of getting this range under 2000 you probably need to leave tests_saved =2.

20220112, 01:35  #5231 
Aug 2020
137 Posts 
Over the last two days I was assigned the following exponents by GPU72.
Factor=N/A,19588279,73,74 Factor=N/A,19591483,73,74 Factor=N/A,19588337,73,74 Today I turned in the first two and am currently 85% done with the third. Unfortunately TheJudger turned in all three exponents yesterday. Just to be clear because my post is factual, This is just factual. I do not know how TheJudger and I got assigned the same assignments and I am not upset that it happened. I just thought that Chris would want to know that somehow the exponents got assigned twice. (my wife tells me often that people think I am mad when I am just being factual) Last fiddled with by DrobinsonPE on 20220112 at 01:53 Reason: Disclaimer 
20220112, 02:33  #5232  
Aug 2021
California
20_{8} Posts 
Quote:
If your worktodo lines were "Factor=195____" when you started them, then likely the server had already assigned the exponents and bounced them back to you with 'N/A' inserted. 

20220112, 02:54  #5233  
"/X\(‘‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
2^{3}×3^{2}×41 Posts 
Quote:


20220112, 18:56  #5234 
Aug 2021
California
10000_{2} Posts 
And the Prime95 server can't know what GPU72 has reserved? Sounds like setting up a bunch of unintentional poaching then.
Last fiddled with by LordJulius on 20220112 at 19:03 Reason: Reword 
20220112, 20:00  #5235  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
10100011100100_{2} Posts 
Quote:
There was a legacy conditional from several years ago which resulted in Oliver being given a bunch of insane assignments. Oliver brought this to my attention, and I finally had some cycles to drill down, and figure out where the SPE was. Again... Sorry about that everyone. A cycle is an awful thing to waste. Everything /should/ be sane moving forward. Please report if things don't seem sane. 

20220113, 04:10  #5236 
"/X\(‘‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
2^{3}×3^{2}×41 Posts 
Looks like I did ten unneeded assignments as well. A day of processing. Not the worst; oh well.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Status  Primeinator  Operation Billion Digits  5  20111206 02:35 
62 bit status  1997rj7  Lone Mersenne Hunters  27  20080929 13:52 
OBD Status  Uncwilly  Operation Billion Digits  22  20051025 14:05 
12M LLR status  paulunderwood  3*2^n1 Search  2  20050313 17:03 
Status of 26.0M  26.5M  1997rj7  Lone Mersenne Hunters  25  20040618 16:46 