mersenneforum.org mega-thrust earthquake along cascadia fault
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2010-07-06, 12:10 #1 science_man_88     "Forget I exist" Jul 2009 Dumbassville 26·131 Posts mega-thrust earthquake along cascadia fault I was watching discovery talk about a megathrust equake that would supposedly happen soon (last one like it in 1700's) but the odds they give even now is 1/200,000 to happen in the first 14 months of the cycle they see, and 1/4000 to happen in the 2 week after-part even these odds put it over 4000 years in the future so why are they talking of it happening soon ?
2010-07-06, 21:12   #2

"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22·3·641 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by science_man_88 even these odds put it over 4000 years in the future so why are they talking of it happening soon ?
No, those odds do _not_ "put it" any amount of time "in the future". That is not the way to interpret that number.

Are you thinking that because the earthquake has a (I'm not sure how to interpret your description, so here's a guess) 1/4000 chance of happening in the next year, that there must necessarily be 4000 years before it happens? That's not how it goes. All the 1/4000 figure means is that it's a simple way of conveying some persons' prediction over a certain time period, not over 4000 years.

The Cascadia fault is not performing arithmetic. It doesn't care about the 1/4000 figure. It doesn't have to count up to 4000 before it slips again. It could slip tomorrow.

 2010-07-06, 21:25 #3 philmoore     "Phil" Sep 2002 Tracktown, U.S.A. 3·373 Posts He may be referring to the Juan de Fuca fault off the coast of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. It slipped on January 26, 1700 with an estimate quake of Richter 9. Some geologists have suggested that it repeats every 300 to 500 years, but I have read one geologist's predicition that there is an 80% chance of it going in the next 50 years! I've been planning to get earthquake insurance on our home soon...
2010-07-06, 23:53   #4
science_man_88

"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26·131 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by cheesehead No, those odds do _not_ "put it" any amount of time "in the future". That is not the way to interpret that number. Are you thinking that because the earthquake has a (I'm not sure how to interpret your description, so here's a guess) 1/4000 chance of happening in the next year, that there must necessarily be 4000 years before it happens? That's not how it goes. All the 1/4000 figure means is that it's a simple way of conveying some persons' prediction over a certain time period, not over 4000 years. The Cascadia fault is not performing arithmetic. It doesn't care about the 1/4000 figure. It doesn't have to count up to 4000 before it slips again. It could slip tomorrow.
sorry not thinking and philmore I'm saying they say that about the whole cascadia fault not just the part you talked of.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post pepi37 Riesel Prime Search 5 2014-02-05 21:39 Christenson Lounge 12 2011-11-04 12:37 Andi47 Lounge 1 2010-02-27 22:30 jasong jasong 1 2008-12-26 10:19 davieddy Soap Box 15 2008-08-15 17:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:34.

Mon Dec 6 12:34:24 UTC 2021 up 136 days, 7:03, 0 users, load averages: 2.40, 1.80, 1.55