mersenneforum.org lowest 10M exponents available - pick your choice
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2008-05-27, 11:58   #78
tha

Dec 2002

3×271 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by markr I'll take 34200671, as stage 1 of P-1 found a factor of 34200259. I did the trial factoring & P-1 since the "1" at the end of the Test= lines didn't seem right with it only being TF'd to 63 bits, and the v5 server shows no P-1 results for this candidate, or the others TF'd to 63 bits.
Oops, that was my error. I forgot to do the proper check during the latest extending of the list. It has now been corrected.

Last fiddled with by tha on 2008-05-28 at 17:16

 2008-05-30, 10:41 #79 JHagerson     May 2005 Naperville, IL, USA 19610 Posts M33801673 is not prime. I sent e-mail to George.
 2008-05-31, 13:09 #80 JHagerson     May 2005 Naperville, IL, USA 22×72 Posts Tha, the new assignments have ",0" at the end. Prime95 factored the assignments and stopped. I put them back into worktodo.ini with ",1" at the end and updated the factoring level from 63 to 67. Prime95 is now crunching away on them. The current estimate for M34200457 is July 18 and M34200671 is September 4.
2008-06-01, 01:38   #81
markr

"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney

10001111012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by JHagerson The current estimate for M34200457 is July 18 and M34200671 is September 4.
Oops, I've also started on 34200671 - sorry about that. When I was looking for a replacement for 34200259, I saw in post 76 you had 34200457, but I missed the other one. The LL test for 34200671 has barely started, so no great loss. It is now TF'd to 67 bits & the P-1 is done. (Reported via the manual pages, but not showing up anywhere yet.)

Last fiddled with by markr on 2008-06-01 at 01:41

2008-06-01, 01:53   #82
markr

"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney

23D16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by JHagerson the new assignments have ",0" at the end. Prime95 factored the assignments and stopped. I put them back into worktodo.ini with ",1" at the end and updated the factoring level from 63 to 67.
The ",0" is right - these had not had a P-1 test. Did you work out why prime95 stopped after factoring? Was there any message? How much factoring did it do before stopping? Prime95's default should have been to TF to 2^67, then P-1, then go on to the LL test.

 2008-07-09, 12:15 #83 Knappo     Aug 2005 69469, Germany 3×5 Posts I would like to reserve two exponents, the first M34200911 will have ETA August 2008, the second M34200979 will be finished by September 2008. If there is a problem with my reservations, send me a PM or reply to this thread.
2008-07-10, 08:30   #84
tha

Dec 2002

3×271 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by cochet When there is an error code, like that : 33600877Serge BatalovhomeQ660097A2A2D3914C6C__00000300
This particular exponent has been LL tested more than once with the same LL residue as result. The error codes are insignificant when the LL residues match.

I decided to work on low 10M digits that have only one LL residue with an error code <> 0 as well. I checked in the first four results early this week and I expect to check in another 6 results early in August.

Best way of checking in results is using the new v5 server which has a separate form for checking in results manually.

 2008-07-10, 08:58 #85 bandguyz24   Jul 2008 310 Posts New to this Forum THA and all readers on this forum I'm on the 10M run myself. I would like more information about this thread. are these prime 95 checks or personal software. I am looking for pre-built strings of huge numberss to test.
2008-07-14, 01:14   #86
JHagerson

May 2005
Naperville, IL, USA

22·72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by markr The ",0" is right - these had not had a P-1 test. Did you work out why prime95 stopped after factoring? Was there any message? How much factoring did it do before stopping? Prime95's default should have been to TF to 2^67, then P-1, then go on to the LL test.
Markr,

Sorry I didn't see your post earlier. As I said earlier, with the ",0" suffix, the numbers were factored to 2^67 and then Prime95 stopped, saying it had no work. Then, I used the ",1" suffix and the first was P-1 factored and then went into LL test.

I'm sorry about the confusion on the -671 exponent. I had not requested it, but I found my name next to it in the first post of this thread so I added it to my worktodo.

I would also like to report that M34200457 is not prime. I sent the results to George through e-mail. The -671 exponent has started LL testing and the ETC is late August.

John

 2008-07-14, 13:13 #87 markr     "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3·191 Posts No problems, John. Progress report - 33985241 is not prime, checked in using the v5 manual results page. (Ever-watchful tha has already noted its completion in the summary.) 34200709 still has about a month to go. Mark
 2008-07-21, 09:27 #88 ckdo     Dec 2007 Cleves, Germany 2·5·53 Posts I've done some trial factoring on the remaining exponents. The tail of the table should now read: Code: Test=34200709,63,0 - markr - August 2008 Test=34200911,68,0 - Knappo - August 2008 Test=34200979,68,0 - Knappo - September 2008 Test=34201073,63,0 - checked in - Tha - July 2008 Test=34201081,68,0 Test=34201177,68,0 Test=34201333,68,0 Test=34201417,68,0 Test=34201883,68,0 Test=34201987,68,0 Results have been reported to the V5 server. Cheers, Carsten Last fiddled with by ckdo on 2008-07-21 at 09:38 Reason: Post #1 missing reservations from post #83

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post patrik PrimeNet 9 2014-04-09 23:30 GuyMacon PrimeNet 6 2011-05-07 03:20 crash893 Data 7 2006-01-26 05:26 edorajh PrimeNet 2 2004-01-21 13:18 delta_t Hardware 54 2003-08-09 18:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:08.

Tue May 11 20:08:08 UTC 2021 up 33 days, 14:49, 1 user, load averages: 2.63, 2.19, 2.00