20221003, 15:49  #133 
Jun 2012
7627_{8} Posts 
5+4,379 is finishing ECM and ready for sieving on 15e_small.
Code:
n: 3227464012291430059925006429562736991742298035759577233584692341821292441570236308011326741949434905019800801415529473954432475829344916657228646963082311859555305850721203301368804259023792913517484069189403446498547 skew: 0.9635 type: snfs size: 2654 c6: 5 c0: 4 Y1: 85070591730234615865843651857942052864 Y0: 108420217248550443400745280086994171142578125 rlim: 134000000 alim: 266000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 91 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.5 alambda: 2.3 Code:
MQ Norm_yield 35 2236 50 2038 75 1799 100 1653 150 1388 200 1273 
20221004, 00:14  #134 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
16B6_{16} Posts 
esmall should not be 134/266M lims.
Should we loosen esmall to 134/180M to make it easier to get some mediumsized jobs onto esmall? Does 134/180 still require lowenough RAM? 
20221004, 00:47  #135  
Jun 2012
111110010111_{2} Posts 
D’oh! I’ll change it and retest. Again…
Quote:
In all seriousness, expanding the limit range for 15e_small will allow more now borderline jobs into the small queue but no idea how many more. How about shifting the lim values on a trial basis? 

20221004, 14:24  #136 
Jun 2012
3991_{10} Posts 
5+4,379
Well it turns out this particular job is a nice edge case example. I have changed both lims to 134M and retested. Results follow:
Code:
MQ Norm_yield 35 1987 50 1806 75 1577 100 1457 150 1206 205 1092 If a few more rels are desired, I could run this job as a 32/31 with both lims at 134M. It’s likely to generate close to 360M relations, certainly more than enough to build a good matrix. This stays within the current 15e_small guidelines. OR we could raise one lim to 180M as suggested by Mike. Or keep the lims=134M in place but increase the max allowable q range to 175 or 180M. Thoughts? 
20221004, 15:27  #137 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·3^{2}·17·19 Posts 
32/31 is clearly a good idea here, as it reduces the Qrange needed by 10M or so; your listed Qrange ought to build a smaller matrix on 32/31 than 31/31, or you can reduce Qmax by 5M. If you also run with 134/180 lims, you can definitely reduce Q.
I think raising lims to 134/180 is faster for these biggish jobs than just increasing Qrange. As a policy choice, I'd rather increase lim than increase Qrange by a bunch we should encourage the mostefficient params possible. I do think allowing a bit larger Q's is okay, too, like Qmax  Qmin = 200M as a hard cap. Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20221004 at 15:28 
20221004, 19:01  #138  
Jun 2012
13×307 Posts 
Quote:
 Max lim is 180M, max sum 314M  Qmax  Qmin = 200M max  If any doubt, use 15e 

20221005, 06:20  #139 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×3^{2}×17×19 Posts 
QUEUED AS 5_2_799m1
5*2^7991 is ready for esmall: Code:
n: 79651104085496806147989601004834247853520217010018278499254324737035613207807596125911433334131437481727456670507064366237945279800818216511769193230913526816083910575352449333506721702114369964961192163 type: snfs skew: 0.70 c6: 10 c0: 1 Y1: 1 Y0: 10889035741470030830827987437816582766592 rlim: 100000000 alim: 36000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 31 mfbr: 61 mfba: 59 rlambda: 2.4 alambda: 2.75 Code:
#Q=8M 8784 (0.031 sec/rel) 74 spq #Q=10M 7220 (0.034 sec/rel) 66 spq #Q=20M 7852 (0.035 sec/rel) 70 spq #Q=30M 7657 (0.039 sec/rel) 74 spq #Q=40M 5951 (0.045 sec/rel) 66 spq Last fiddled with by swellman on 20221005 at 13:33 
20221005, 18:24  #140 
Jun 2012
111110010111_{2} Posts 
5+4_379 Final
Retested 5+4,379 using the new guidelines for 15e_small.
Code:
n: 3227464012291430059925006429562736991742298035759577233584692341821292441570236308011326741949434905019800801415529473954432475829344916657228646963082311859555305850721203301368804259023792913517484069189403446498547 skew: 0.9635 type: snfs size: 264 c6: 5 c0: 4 Y1: 85070591730234615865843651857942052864 Y0: 108420217248550443400745280086994171142578125 rlim: 134000000 alim: 180000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 31 mfbr: 94 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.55 alambda: 2.3 Code:
MQ Norm_yield 35 2980 50 2743 75 2459 100 2288 150 1898 200 1670 It’s likely heavier than necessary with 350M relations but I wanted to put this one to bed with no more fuss. 
20221006, 15:58  #141  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·3^{2}·17·19 Posts 
Quote:
Done. Last fiddled with by swellman on 20221006 at 16:37 

20221010, 18:51  #142 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3,923 Posts 
QUEUED AS 184__317_5m1
C202 from the OPN t800 file. Code:
n: 4818416278825822717497859692828421388802563630175271905759341256352812529492654404845202794321322290679534875569470111642299528753756998827806737170224794228509957129099577524259218437279299198369331621 # 18476667209739417836226575582820864051602717104805244317^51, difficulty: 221.07, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45 # cost: 8.39945e+17, est. time: 399.97 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 1.000 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: 1 Y0: 18476667209739417836226575582820864051602717104805244317 type: snfs rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 90 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.5 alambda: 2.7 Code:
Q Yield NYld 20M 6686 7467 50M 8561 9027 80M 7484 8658 84M 9093 8447 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20221010 at 19:29 
20221011, 01:55  #143 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
5814_{10} Posts 
QUEUED AS 5_2_800m1
5*2^8001 is ready for esmall: Code:
n: 130077498246834412217011031357798188997761545728948997722507355083431588378275973104054810489044049128426861721513906631880558292940513942222844911571935690010245798204840818076635662297462702794562830888316589670461306523879 type: snfs skew: 0.61 c6: 20 c0: 1 Y1: 1 Y0: 10889035741470030830827987437816582766592 rlim: 100000000 alim: 42000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 31 mfbr: 61 mfba: 59 rlambda: 2.4 alambda: 2.65 Code:
#Q=10M 7921 (0.039 sec/rel) 76 spq #Q=20M 7258 (0.042 sec/rel) 72 spq #Q=30M 4343 (0.051 sec/rel) 50 spq #Q=40M 3576 (0.052 sec/rel) 40 spq #Q=50M 6021 (0.056 sec/rel) 74 spq #Q=60M 3989 (0.059 sec/rel) 52 spq Last fiddled with by swellman on 20221011 at 06:05 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Queue management for 14e queue  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  170  20230102 15:27 
2022 Queue management of 15e  swellman  NFS@Home  186  20221227 12:53 
Queue management for 16e queue  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  154  20221223 21:35 
Queue management for e_small and 15e queues  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  254  20220102 01:59 
Improving the queue management.  debrouxl  NFS@Home  10  20180506 21:05 