Queue management for e_small and 15e queues - Page 2

chris2be8 · 2020-09-25, 15:52

QUEUED AS f45_151p1

(45^151+1)/46 from the Brent tables:

Code:

# Built Thu Sep 24 19:25:29 2020
# Estimated SNFS difficulty 250, GNFS equivalent 180, GNFS difficulty 248, degree 6
n: 93827846437802973854573176480124976379315282365652051468061831477010695511674981968561449188381258588996969741356196004419606765233147249029453619721890132499459126383927106222262163829920734768729699703114955917010212137147786763861127521680748981
type: snfs
c6: 45
c0: 1
# Y0 = 45^25
Y0: 213950272706703123083784878253936767578125
# Y1 = 1^0
Y1: 1
# msieve rating: skew 0.53, size 2.214e-12, alpha 1.366, combined = 2.123e-13 rroots = 0
skew: 0.53
rlim: 120000000
alim: 120000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6

Sieve on 15e_small from 40M to 150M on the algebraic side.

Test sieving 10k ranges:

Code:

I'll do the LA.

Chris

chris2be8 · 2020-09-25, 18:46

Hello,

Please extend f38_158p1 sieving range to 130M. I miscalculated how far I would need to sieve and it's not going to get enough relations by 110M.

Chris

RichD · 2020-09-26, 13:36

QUEUED AS 467_97m1

C225 from the OPN t600 file.

Code:

n: 297997762184641871561669448877344955360732992443216565255440340416843330771135628165786179961853404791721396460348765068213118520367769173801856349183361291231851469964923939817626918325246806499993875146464338871068602589157
# 467^97-1, difficulty: 258.92, skewness: 0.09, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 1.62979e+19, est. time: 7760.89 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 0.359
c6: 467
c0: -1
Y1: -1
Y0: 5117644204989274756527768473111710400278081
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

Trial sieving 5K blocks.

Code:

swellman · 2020-09-28, 20:29

Reserving 3p2_1686L for postprocessing.

unconnected · 2020-09-30, 21:40

QUEUED AS C183_933436_12561

C183 from 933436:i12561 for 15e queue

Code:

n: 346779657259791246313554044276401199475050208141387409790076498969471905612322027394740984520613397049141959352962783652552620174555843715898338877709473791695077522065984368363437509
Y0: -240952170476247018923305274129662575
Y1: 27974981112937694614
c0: -11805353835308925219407149226473788139169936
c1: 28310203131931821503416958734401777279
c2: -506179582591784048138330191199
c3: -26839071574361133800982
c4: 120405988862950
c5: 1707888
skew: 60697512.10
# size 6.801e-18, alpha -7.787, combined = 5.671e-14 rroots = 5
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 91
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 3.5
type: gnfs
lss: 0

Suggesting sieve range is 30M-200M (looking for ~260M raw relations).

swellman · 2020-10-02, 12:25

I just enqueued 9p8_305, the last of the Homogeneous Cunningham composites suitable for 15e_small.

There will be no more. All further HCN work will need to sieve on 15e or f_small.

chris2be8 · 2020-10-02, 15:52

(48^148+1)/5308417 from the Brent tables:

Code:

# Built Thu Oct  1 19:31:23 2020
# Estimated SNFS difficulty 251, GNFS equivalent 181, GNFS difficulty 243, degree 6
n: 125527274767648583936106132931691528458418208390548154211539089513353496858137470216086056001597727876666307372130927675071684940430054631605322720469657625821424522709661414166983336792589554140001317810135745307732822035781539444451265413121
type: snfs
c6: 1
c0: 36
# Y0 = 48^25/2
Y0: 537032957163480394014074900915955940982784
# Y1 = 1^0*2/2
Y1: 1
# msieve rating: skew 1.82, size 2.357e-12, alpha 0.954, combined = 2.209e-13 rroots = 0
skew: 1.817
rlim: 120000000
alim: 120000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6

Sieve with 15e from 40M to 140M on the algebraic side.

Test sieving 10k ranges:

Code:

And apologies for posting the result of f38_158p1 in the 15e thread instead of the 15e_small thread.

Chris

chris2be8 · 2020-10-02, 18:47

Forgot to say:

1: I'll do LA for 48^148+1

2: Can a mod please move my post saying f38_158p1 is factored to the 15e_small thread.

Chris (wishing I'd had another cup of coffee before making my last post)

RichD · 2020-10-03, 20:30

QUEUED AS 428__749_19m1

C226 from the OPN file t600.
This polynomial is subject to a higher dup rate.
Sieve on the algebraic side.

Code:

n: 1047864885157677398771127025488814688971855058061574149842501573900373320359274636593533383768420691745854884772230424595825904577158265164934623812197136376405296084476684621488028914549131498725573456526895201442285036750619
# 4287755796749^19-1, difficulty: 240.01, skewness: 0.01, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 3.83716e+18, est. time: 1827.22 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
lss: 0
skew: 0.008
c6: 4287755796749
c0: -1
Y1: -1
Y0: 78829746184630742457434595059507577749
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 90
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 3.6

Trial sieving 5K blocks.

Code:

chris2be8 · 2020-10-10, 15:53

QUEUED AS f57_142p1_2nd_try on 15e_small

(57^142+1)/9081974645657051345350287190506431773271039081219156713449250 from the Brent tables:

Code:

# Parms passed Fri Oct  9 18:04:10 2020
# SNFS difficulty is 250, GNFS equivalent is 183, GNFS difficulty is 189, degree 5
n: 237710967884698075579574222248730247413255418043979969554935038860240233536857295444883474293657157206451609002481208108212159704485766296390871734016981833659097138522843231790057716354009
type: snfs
#name: f57_142+1
c5: 3249
c0: 1
# Y0 = 57^28
Y0: 14604811593991510424147435018807634286571929892001
# Y1 = 1^0
Y1: -1
# msieve rating: skew 0.20, size 3.521e-17, alpha -0.034, combined = 1.123e-13 rroots = 1
skew: 0.2
rlim: 120000000
alim: 120000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6

I test sieved both degree 5 and degree 6 polys, degree 5 definitely has a higher yield.

Sieve with 15e from 40M to 150M on the rational side.

Test sieving 10k ranges:

Code:

I'll do the LA.

Chris

chris2be8 · 2020-10-11, 15:56

Hello,

Sorry for the abiguity in my post, I meant sieve f57_142p1 with the 15e siever, but on the 15e_small queue. Can you move it from the 15e queue to 15e_small (it's not started sieving yet so could be killed and a new job started).

Chris

2020-10-02, 12:25	#17
swellman Jun 2012 2×11×181 Posts	I just enqueued 9p8_305, the last of the Homogeneous Cunningham composites suitable for 15e_small. There will be no more. All further HCN work will need to sieve on 15e or f_small. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-02 at 12:27

2020-10-11, 15:56	#22
chris2be8 Sep 2009 4625₈ Posts	f57_142p1 is on the wrong queue. Hello, Sorry for the abiguity in my post, I meant sieve f57_142p1 with the 15e siever, but on the 15e_small queue. Can you move it from the 15e queue to 15e_small (it's not started sieving yet so could be killed and a new job started). Chris

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
System management notes	kriesel	kriesel	10	2021-09-01 15:56
Run down the queue on MPRIME without quitting GIMPS	Rodrigo	Software	7	2018-05-25 13:26
Improving the queue management.	debrouxl	NFS@Home	10	2018-05-06 21:05
split a prime95 queue & client installation	joblack	Information & Answers	1	2009-01-06 08:45
Power Management settings	PrimeCroat	Hardware	3	2004-02-17 19:11

2020-09-25, 18:46	#13
chris2be8 Sep 2009 2453₁₀ Posts	Hello, Please extend f38_158p1 sieving range to 130M. I miscalculated how far I would need to sieve and it's not going to get enough relations by 110M. Chris

2020-09-28, 20:29	#15
swellman Jun 2012 F8E₁₆ Posts	Reserving 3p2_1686L for postprocessing.

2020-10-02, 18:47	#19
chris2be8 Sep 2009 11×223 Posts	Forgot to say: 1: I'll do LA for 48^148+1 2: Can a mod please move my post saying f38_158p1 is factored to the 15e_small thread. Chris (wishing I'd had another cup of coffee before making my last post)