|
2021-03-05, 19:45
|
#936 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
10010010001012 Posts |
Is there a sense that the filtering bug was squashed, and only the size of the dataset is in the way of filtering jobs this size?
Seems 33/35 is better than 33/36 for this job, to shrink the dataset by 25% (say, 2.1B uniques rather than 2.8B). I suppose it only matters in principle, since matrix size also stands in the way of trying an even-tougher job. Bravo for slaying this beast, all the same! Well, almost done.. |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive Pascal | Xyzzy | GPU Computing | 1 | 2017-05-17 20:22 |
| Tesla P100 — 5.4 DP TeraFLOPS — Pascal | Mark Rose | GPU Computing | 52 | 2016-07-02 12:11 |
| Nvidia Pascal, a third of DP | firejuggler | GPU Computing | 12 | 2016-02-23 06:55 |
| Calculating perfect numbers in Pascal | Elhueno | Homework Help | 5 | 2008-06-12 16:37 |
| Factorization attempt to a c163 - a new Odd Perfect Number roadblock | jchein1 | Factoring | 30 | 2005-05-30 14:43 |
