![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
May 2004
FRANCE
27B16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Would you inform me about that? Thank you by advance! Also would you note that llrCUDA can be faster than CPU LLR only for base two and large numbers (at least 1M decimal digits). For smaller numbers, the GPU parallelism is not an advantage enough... Regards, Jean |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Dec 2011
After 1.58M nines:)
6F016 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
May 2004
FRANCE
5·127 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
llrCUDA Version 3.8.6 is released! | Jean Penné | Software | 0 | 2022-05-25 13:28 |
llrCUDA Version 3.8.5 is released! | Jean Penné | Software | 13 | 2022-05-09 05:19 |
llrCUDA version 3.8.4 is released! | Jean Penné | Software | 0 | 2021-05-02 14:39 |
llrCUDA version 3.8.3 is released! | Jean Penné | Software | 13 | 2021-03-19 20:29 |
LLR Version 3.8.9 released | Jean Penné | Software | 37 | 2013-10-31 08:45 |