20151102, 17:23  #1 
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
17·449 Posts 
Reservations?
The Homogeneous Cunningham reservations page says that 12,7,226+
was reserved by NFS@Home. Yet I see no sign of it on the NFS@Home web site. It does not seem to be queued. Is there a disconnect? 
20151102, 17:30  #2 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3·7·13·19 Posts 
NFS@Home is finalising sieve of 6,490+ . I don't see that number on the queue but I'll let you know as soon as I see it.
Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 20151102 at 17:37 
20151102, 17:52  #3 
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
17×449 Posts 

20151104, 15:55  #4 
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
1110111010001_{2} Posts 

20151104, 16:01  #5 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×7×13×19 Posts 
Here's the update I had a few hours ago from Greg.
NFS@Home is nearly finishing with the redo of 6,490+. After that, there we need to go a little further on 2,1285. Greg had issued another 100k WU’s for that. After NFS@Home will move to some of the easier ones on the Cunningham Project wanted list. Regarding the latter Greg didn't mention which integers. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 20151104 at 16:01 
20151104, 16:10  #6 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×7×13×19 Posts 
Just to be clear, Greg didn't mention Homogeneous Cunningham project.
Edit: just thought about one thing. This is possible, I've done it while ago when I sieved a few integers for GCW. There might be a chance that Greg is using NFS@Home platform to distribute that Homogeneous Cunningham integer to his machines. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 20151104 at 16:16 
20151104, 17:15  #7  
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
2·929 Posts 
Quote:


20151104, 17:15  #8  
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
17×449 Posts 
Quote:
(1) This is from lasieved (i.e. the SMALL numbers) (2) It is not Cunningham. It is Homogeneous Cunningham. (3) Someone from NFS@Home reserved the number, but it has not been queued for lasieved. 

20151104, 17:23  #9  
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3·7·13·19 Posts 
Quote:
What I am telling you is there might be a chance that he's distributing that integer to his machines using lasieved, he has done it in the past for me. It won't show up in the progress page. edit: checking tasks in his machines.... Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 20151104 at 17:24 

20151105, 01:48  #10 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2×3^{2}×149 Posts 
I have no record of this number, although I haven't managed the 14e queue in a while. Perhaps Lionel or Tom know its status.
Edit: That said, it's a fairly trivial number to factor, so it can be thrown in the queue. Last fiddled with by frmky on 20151105 at 01:49 
20151105, 14:17  #11 
Sep 2009
3^{2}×109 Posts 
The most likely explanation is clearly that I just forgot to preprocess and queue it

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Reservations  ET_  Operazione Doppi Mersennes  575  20230914 17:35 
Reservations  kar_bon  Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n1)  136  20230214 06:58 
Where are my reservations  fivemack  PrimeNet  3  20160208 17:58 
Reservations  R.D. Silverman  Cunningham Tables  15  20110304 21:01 
45M Reservations  paulunderwood  3*2^n1 Search  15  20080608 03:29 