mersenneforum.org Brimstone for cracking RSA. (jk)
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2020-11-06, 21:42   #56
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·32·7·73 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by SarK0Y You lost very point == the task ain't been just solve (it has no sense) == the task is to solve (at least approximate as much as possible) for POLYNOMIAL TIME. can you do it? so, don't feed me numbers == the're a hella lot of them w/o such help
And you earned yourself a timeout. PM me or any supermod with the factorization of the first test to have posting privileges restored.

 2020-11-11, 07:45 #57 Ericmonroe   "Eric" Nov 2020 United States 2 Posts I think you should know more about the difference between a factor and multiple.
 2020-11-13, 13:42 #58 Ericmonroe   "Eric" Nov 2020 United States 2 Posts I also researched some information about my question and found this answer https://differencebtwn.com/differenc...or-vs-multiple
2020-12-15, 23:55   #59
SarK0Y

Jan 2010

2·43 Posts

@Gelly
Always good to see a decent criticism.. well then, let's be clear upon that AMAP
Quote:
 You claimed to "have a milestone" in integer factorization and continue claiming that you will "crack rsa,
First & foremost, we need to look into canonical definition of «MILESTONE»..
Quote:
 2. a significant event or point in development. https://www.thefreedictionary.com/milestone
it doesn't mean «final point» & definitely it doesn't mean something magic. It just means that project has had some positive/promising results to proceed further. 2nd moment, Polynomial time doesn't mean you can crack everything in no time. For example, O(N*lgN) & O(N²) are both polynomial time, but (w/ growing N) gap between those speeds becomes Abyss.
Quote:
 You then refuse to demonstrate (or even explain!) your method in a significant way
actually, there ain't been questions on-topic.. some guys struggled w/ their deep fears of malware & others just have wanted a magic out of the Blue
Quote:
 but I'm pretty sure you need the exact sum, and not just an approximation,
from the POV of Practice, we need approximation a way down to the point, where it's possible to use brute force for getting exact sum.

https://alg0z.blogspot.com/2020/12/major-update-fpc15rev3.html

Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 2020-12-16 at 00:13 Reason: As indicated

2020-12-16, 17:02   #60
mathwiz

Mar 2019

11·13 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by SarK0Y actually, there ain't been questions on-topic..
Actually, there have been: "Can you factor this composite to demonstrate your algorithm isn't complete BS?"

Last fiddled with by mathwiz on 2020-12-16 at 17:02

2020-12-16, 21:12   #61
SarK0Y

Jan 2010

8610 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mathwiz Actually, there have been: "Can you factor this composite to demonstrate your algorithm isn't complete BS?"
say me, please, what do you mean with phrase «complete BS». For now, the're no algorithms of integer factorization for practical use == they're too greedy for memory & cpu + they're bad for concurrency too. And actually I have shared everything about my researching. my goal hasn't been to crack occasional rsa numbers, just been researching possible ways to approximate Z. at the very least, it's curious from the POV of theoretical matter

 2020-12-16, 23:28 #62 Dylan14     "Dylan" Mar 2017 22316 Posts Initial investigation of the file: VirusTotal reports that the URL is clean. The file that that link takes me is clean, according to VirusTotal. Attempting to run the program sandboxed in Windows 10 doesn't work (needs the bash shell to work, plus Start.exe fails to start). Attempting to run it in a Linux VM, gets me this far when I run the first bit of code in the pdf you linked: Code: ./fpc -ver -poweredby -bye sh: en: command not found see seed: 682257166327978917907309860240882231625049719486075477905198 bits: 199 Please, enter a coef 4 Z: Which is not the expected result. So I thought, maybe I should recompile. Except that doesn't work, as the stuff in the makefile appears to be hardcoded, due to the software used to make the makefile. This of course makes it impossible for one to just download the source and compile, unless they go through the trouble of making the file themselves (which I am not going to do).
2020-12-16, 23:56   #63
SarK0Y

Jan 2010

1268 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dylan14 Initial investigation of the file: VirusTotal reports that the URL is clean. The file that that link takes me is clean, according to VirusTotal. Attempting to run the program sandboxed in Windows 10 doesn't work (needs the bash shell to work, plus Start.exe fails to start). Attempting to run it in a Linux VM, gets me this far when I run the first bit of code in the pdf you linked: Code: ./fpc -ver -poweredby -bye sh: en: command not found see seed: 682257166327978917907309860240882231625049719486075477905198 bits: 199 Please, enter a coef 4 Z: Which is not the expected result. So I thought, maybe I should recompile. Except that doesn't work, as the stuff in the makefile appears to be hardcoded, due to the software used to make the makefile. This of course makes it impossible for one to just download the source and compile, unless they go through the trouble of making the file themselves (which I am not going to do).
what is version you downloaded? actually, i use codelite to edit sources & build 'em.

P.S.
Quote:
my bad :) in the main.cpp

Quote:
 system("TZ='Europe/Moscow' en date");
delete it or change to..
Quote:
 system("date");

Last fiddled with by SarK0Y on 2020-12-17 at 00:03

2020-12-17, 00:07   #64
Dylan14

"Dylan"
Mar 2017

547 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by SarK0Y what is version you downloaded? actually, i use codelite to edit sources & build 'em.
Rev 3, the latest one in this thread (ie the one where the hyperlink is disabled due to potential malware risk).

2020-12-17, 00:16   #65
SarK0Y

Jan 2010

8610 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dylan14 Rev 3, the latest one in this thread (ie the one where the hyperlink is disabled due to potential malware risk).
what is funny sourceforge has shown no downloads and all archives are healthy (except directory for encrypted ones).

 2020-12-17, 03:54 #66 SarK0Y     Jan 2010 2·43 Posts https: //sourceforge.net/projects/fastprimecruncher/files/Build/FPC15/build.sh/download this script builds stuff... [QUOTEmkdir ./Debug export compiler=$1$compiler -c "./main.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/main.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./gears.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/gears.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./vars.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/vars.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./S0T.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/S0T.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./alt_funcs.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/alt_funcs.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./taltws.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/taltws.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./S0T_v0.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/S0T_v0.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -c "./gears2.cpp" -g -g3 -O0 -pedantic -Wall -std=gnu++20 -o ./Debug/gears2.cpp.o -I$2/include -I.$compiler -o ./Debug/FastPrimeCruncher @"FastPrimeCruncher.txt" -L. -L\$2/lib64 -g -lgmp -lpthread chmod u+x ./Debug/FastPrimeCruncher echo "path to program is ./Debug/FastPrimeCruncher"[/QUOTE]just put it into project's directory, then chmod u+x ./build.sh & run ./build.sh /path/to/g++ /dir/of/gcc Ex. ./build.sh /gcc10/bin/g++ /gcc10 Last fiddled with by SarK0Y on 2020-12-17 at 04:02

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Owl Miscellaneous Math 11 2021-01-01 01:26 jasong Soap Box 9 2013-03-17 03:28

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:18.

Fri Jan 22 10:18:14 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 6:29, 0 users, load averages: 2.46, 2.37, 2.33