20200603, 19:53  #67 
Nov 2003
2^{2}·5·373 Posts 

20200603, 21:54  #68 
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
7×139 Posts 
I agree.

20200604, 01:39  #69  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·5·467 Posts 
Quote:
Or did you mean you wanted everyone else to do the work, while you watch for entertainment? 

20200604, 15:06  #70  
Nov 2003
16444_{8} Posts 
Quote:
previously making himself heard. 

20200606, 11:12  #71 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
14356_{8} Posts 
I'm unsure as to whether R323 is accessible with the 16e siever. It seems that x^610 sieves slightly better than the octic, but with a yield of about 0.8 relations per Q the search range is annoyingly large. Will compare 33/34/35bit large primes for the sextic under CADO; for the octic the yield boost going to 35bit LP isn't enough.
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 20200606 at 11:14 
20200606, 12:57  #72  
Nov 2003
2^{2}×5×373 Posts 
Quote:
The last is 4 digits larger. I expect that numbers up to ~330 digits should be doable by NFS@Home. Perhaps you are not allowing the 16f siever? Do you really mean to restrict which siever is used? 

20200606, 15:53  #73 
Sep 2009
3·23·29 Posts 
Would the 16f siever support j 16? That boosts yield on 16e (It makes the sieve area 16k x 16k) but raises memory required.
Chris 
20200607, 03:06  #74 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4670_{10} Posts 
When I tested J 16 a couple years ago, it worked on some numbers and Qranges but not others. I didn't find a pattern in which polys were resilient, and which crashed a bunch, so I deemed it unusable.
That 40% yield boost would clearly extend GGNFS sievers another 68 digits! 
20210104, 22:31  #75 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2^{8}×19 Posts 
10,371 Done by NFS@Home

20210131, 16:16  #76 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto
2·3·7·17 Posts 
10,337
10,337 / C202 = P101 * P102 is done by Kurt Beschorner's team on Jan. 30
Congratulation! FactorDB: http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000013091437 Kurt's page: http://kurtbeschorner.de/ Studio Kamada: https://stdkmd.net/nrr/repunit/changes.htm R1740M, c204, GNFS is 66% sieved. I will restart polyselecting for the next GNFS repunit candidate(s) soon (have an 85% good poly already). 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
5+ table  garo  Cunningham Tables  100  20210104 22:36 
7+ table  garo  Cunningham Tables  86  20210104 22:35 
6+ table  garo  Cunningham Tables  80  20210104 22:33 
5 table  garo  Cunningham Tables  82  20200315 21:47 
6 table  garo  Cunningham Tables  41  20160804 04:24 